Vatican II and
the Corrupt Papacy of Francis: Extinguishing the Light of 2000 Years
What does it
do so few dare utter the obvious
— the indisputable realization that Francis is recreant: an apostate;
that his foremost agenda is nothing less than destroying the Catholic
Church as it had been known and recognized for 2000 years prior
to not just to his own papacy, but to Vatican II — of which he is
preeminently the pathological product — and the most vociferous
Few — critics and supporters alike — understand his agendum as
Despite everything he says and does, people insist that he
is doing something other, something less — even when he
himself states that:
“The Second Vatican Council, the 1962-65 meetings
that brought the church into the modern world,
had promised such an opening to people of other faiths and
non-believers, but ... the church hadn’t made progress
since then” and that in light of his predecessors’
failure to deliver on the factitious Ecumenism promised...
“I have the humility and ambition to do so”.
That this is an oxymoron apparently escapes Francis — never a student
or adherent of logic — more than emphasizes Francis’s
limitation to prosaic rhetoric. The tone — to
say nothing of the intention — is absolutely clear: rapprochement with “the world” and pantheistic ecumenism
that extends no less to the heretic Luther than to American aboriginal tribes:
all worship the same god: Gitche Manitou no less than
Allah — for each is a
merely a cultural iteration of the one same divinity that
all equally serve and worship ... even while
Gitche Manitou deems Catholicism demonic and Allah
continues to reap with the sword, holding Catholics to be
idolaters. Quite a unilateral ecumenical
feat … Francis smiles, offers a few grains of incense and a
Pantheon of gods is established despite the incessant
internecine war — to say nothing of the logical absurdity.
Beyond Plausible Deniability
Who can deny it? Indeed, how
many approve of it — especially in the episcopacy — and
encourage it, both inside Holy Mother Church and, of course,
outside Her. They clamor for the world, its perversity, its
immorality, its freedom from any inhibitions, prohibitions,
and all restrictions — that is to say, anything normative
and proscriptive. In other words, they aspire to perfect
freedom and latitude in all things — an aspiration
that eo ipso precludes God. It is a matter far
beyond recourse to any credible notion of plausible
deniability, for the clarity of disaffection is striking,
manifest, and unmistakable.
The Grayscale, and Moral Saturation
It is a world where nothing is intrinsically
and indefeasibly good and nothing intrinsically and indefeasibly
evil. It is, as Francis describes the moral terrain, fundamentally
grayscale: it does not attain to either black or white but merely
fluctuates in saturation without moral absolutes. It is essentially
a sliding gamma scale whose slider can move in one direction only:
to ever diminishing saturation that eventually culminates in the
absence of distinction and discernability altogether — at which
point we can make no pronouncement because there is nothing to pronounce.
It is the impetus to moral relativity, and eventually to moral collapse.
Nihil bonum et nihil malum est.2
Logically, of course, this precludes any coherent conception of
God — a Being Who has decided demands, determinate laws, an invincible
propensity for ONLY what is good and an absolute and unequivocal
demand for it. The two … let us say “propensities” … therefore,
are incompatible and irreconcilable. It is called the Law of the
Excluded Middle in Logic. One cannot have something and at one and
the same time the negation of it. One cannot have God and turpitude,
good that is concurrently evil. Of course the two exist — but as
contrarieties, not as moral and metaphysical equivalents.
Instead of providing a breastwork
against this doctrine that is alien to Catholicism, Francis urges
it further, and the further it is prompted the more inconsistent
it becomes, the less recognizable as something distinct from a thousand
other “iterations” of “Christianity” equally claiming plausibility
upon the most tenuous and most often absurd credentials. The
corrupt papacy of Francis, coupled with — and as a result of
— the horrific consequences of Vatican II has made the new
“Church of Accompaniment in Sin and a God of Surprises” a
simulacrum and nothing more: a poorly contrived counterfeit at
Expunging 2000 Years … in 5
“Make a Mess”, Francis “devilishly”
proclaimed. He has succeeded beyond any pathological fiction he
could have possibly conjured:
In a short five years he has
either contorted, disfigured or dismantled the Catholic Church
purchased with the Blood of Christ and sealed with the blood of
the Martyrs. He has brought the Catholic Church of
over 2000 years to unimaginable turpitude and inconceivable scandal.
It is barely recognizable as Catholic in any sense
that corresponds to an ecclesiastical identity manifest in the
two millenia before the breach that occurred with the
Second Vatican Council. No longer steeped in holiness (and
with a pronounced and growing aversion to it) —
but in perversion and perversity of the most execrable kind, it is the consummation of
homosexual inbreeding among cardinals,
bishops, priests, and very likely even a pope. Homosexual predators
ordained homosexual priests and barred men who were not homosexual.
These predator priests became homosexual predator bishops, who in
turn nominated other bishops, who then became homosexual criminal
cardinals. Every “boy” took care of and covered, his “boy” until
the possession was nearly complete. It took nearly 60 years of unremitting
and totally dedicated work by the Pink Collar Club — but it brought
the Church to Her knees and perhaps the brink of schism.
POSSESSION of the most Demonic
Nothing short of a total exorcism
of this filth from the seminaries, parishes, chanceries, and monasteries
will suffice. Collars must be torn off. Bishops and Cardinals must
be laicized and evicted in laymen’s clothing to the curbs of their
luxurious offices and remanded to state authorities for investigation.
“The Church of Accompaniment” is in too much complicity to
entrust it with this absolutely necessary fumigation.
Face it and own up to it, whether you are a cardinal, bishop,
priest, friar, monk, sister, nun — and especially a lay person.
You trusted to a fault and despite your own deep and justifiable
misgivings that would not go away … looked the other way instead.
The fault is yours. And it is mine. We did not have the courage
to question and demand answers when our children, our young men,
fell victim to this widespread and indescribably horrible predation
in the holiest of places. We wanted to believe otherwise. And so
We got Francis because we deserve Francis — an uncouth,
vulgar, vindictive, and mentally incompetent man who was “nominated”
through a conspiratorial tour de force into
the seat of Peter by men (members of the notorious St. Gallen
Group, a.k.a. the self-proclaimed “St.
Gallen Mafia” ) unworthy of their collars and birettas,
men who conspired to make a simpleton a king — and when the simpleton
turned vicious and unpredictable, they too became too fearful to
contradict him. They had too much to lose.
And so do we. Even the little we have left will be taken away.
Please God that we can recover a remnant, a mere thread of the beautiful
holiness that was the Church before the Second Vatican Council —
and the papacy of Francis — the man who may have already overthrown
the Catholic Church of 2000 years in a mere five.
Despite him and despite us, Holy Mother Church will endure and prevail.
It may take years … perhaps centuries. But Christ Himself promised
us no less.
“Caelum et terra transibunt, verba autem Mea
non praeteribunt.” (St. Matthew 24.35)
2 Nothing is good and nothing is bad.
Geoffrey K. Mondello, Editor
Boston Catholic Journal
Printable PDF Version
Comments? Write us: