The Face
And the Offspring of
Vatican II

Look carefully at
this emblematic and monstrous vision of Vatican II in the
Pope Paul VI Audience Hall. It is, for want
of any other aesthetic description, demonic and blasphemous,
hideous and frightening — a sign of times to come — that
are now here. |
60 Years After its
Defection from Catholicism
and its Conversion to the World
Hideous — is it not?
The 80 ton monstrosity (the largest
battle tank weighs only 54 tons by comparison) by erotic modernist “sculptor”
Pericle Fazzini (see below) has loomed threateningly over papal audiences
for nearly half a century now — and no one, apparently has told the
Vatican that it scares the hell out of visitors. That it appears much
more demonic than divine seems of little consequence. Much has changed
since 1977 — even apart from the growing defection in the papacy and
the episcopate from what Holy Mother Church taught for 2000 years before
— and subsequent to — that most pernicious council.
It is increasingly female and feminist, and with each passing year it
grows more elderly, gray, and disheveled. Its children — fewer and fewer
every year — are largely the children of the world, checking off the
boxes branded on their young minds by a perverse generation that has
lost its Catholic Faith and Identity: for Abortion (yes), Homosexuality
(yes), Lesbianism (yes), Transgenderism (yes), Gender Identity Choices
(yes), Gender Re-assignment (yes), Euthanasia (yes), Cremation (yes),
Pre-Marital Sex (yes), Co-Habitation (yes), “Social Justice” Issues
(yes!) — the proper formation of a Catholic Conscience (NO!), Chastity
(NO!) Virginity until Marriage (NO!) Sanctity (NO!), learning the most
fundamental aspects of the Catholic Religion into which they were summarily
Baptized (NO!) the Priesthood (NO!), Religious Life (NO!) — Missionary
zeal and the conversion of sinners and those who do not know Christ
— which Francis (perhaps heretically) calls “solemn nonsense.” (NO!)
When they look about them at their fellow “Catholics” and” Priests”,
“Nuns” and “Religious” — even the papacy of Francis and the current
Episcopacy (bishops and cardinals) — who can blame them? The Faith is
not even authentically lived out by the highest prelates — and sadly
enough by Francis himself who gives scandal on a routine basis.
A Lie too Big to Possibly Refute?
They would tell us that our conception of the Holy Catholic Church
prior to Vatican II is naïve and simplistic — that it
has no correspondence with reality and never did. Revisionist history,
however, has become an ideology — an iconoclastic tool for suppressing
what is not consistent with prevailing values in academia: principal
among which is that absolutely nothing in the past was really as it
had been taught us. We have all been deceived. All academics and historians
preceding the present Ideological Revisionists were not scholars at
all; they were biased, mendacious, and inept, with a vested interest
in perpetuating myths and lies — although this vested interest is never
explained, and cannot possibly be without indicting the present generation
of Historical Ideologues as well. Indeed, we no longer have historians
at all, but an ideological cadre of iconoclastic “historiographers”,
ready to discredit any actually contemporary description of history
as it was lived by those contemporaneous with it. It is, after all,
their “job”, their income, to discredit anything that had been held
as true and authentic. This is what any good “historiographer” does:
he speculates upon the most exiguous and often specious evidence to
disprove that what actually was ... actually was not what it actually
was. The “good guys” become the “villains”, and the “villains” the “good
guys”.
Catholicism became “imperialistic” when it abolished human sacrifice
in the Aztec ... “faith community” ... as it would now be called. “Let
them do their own thing without imposing your colonial values on others!”
As Francis might say, they lived “closer to the earth” … and were, eo
ipso, better than other cultures that valued women, children and human
life several feet above it. Ripping the still-beating hearts of its
victims and then hurling them down the temple made of thousands of human
skulls to appease the pagan god Huitzilopochtli 1 is more acceptable
by far, you understand, than the preaching of the Gospel of Jesus Christ
— especially the Sermon on the Mount. It was foreign to their “culture”
after all …
To return to our contention, we must ask, was the Catholic Church prior
to its paganization subsequent to Vatican II really a better Church,
a holier Church? Was the Faith really taken very seriously? Did it actually
produce saints? Was it unsparing in apostolic zeal, in the formation
of holy priests, missionaries, nuns, and Religious sisters? Absolutely!
Unquestionably! By any metric it flourished and was flourishing — until
the convocation of Second Vatican Council ...
It is not the case that the Church quite suddenly attained to the apex
of her mission and mandate in 1960 and was ready to usher in the Parousia
— after which its religious and moral decline was inevitable. It was
thriving! Whence, then, the extraordinarily serious measure of convoking
a council in 1962 (given that the 17th century Cardinal Pallavicini
— the noted historian of the Council of Trent itself — had famously
warned that to propose to convoke any General Council, except through
direst necessity, is to tempt God Himself! 2)
The Tormenting Question ...
There was, however, an excruciating question in the mind of Angelo
Giuseppe Roncalli (John XXIII): a question never quite settled;
and it was a question, a doubt, that relentlessly tormented him: was
the “inspiration” to convoke a council, which he had experienced —
divine or diabolical? Very clearly, as we
had noted, there was no dire necessity in 1962. The Church was thriving
in Her members, Her seminaries, in Her Religious and Missionary Orders,
and consequently in conversions to the Holy Catholic Faith. Whatever
manic episode, or turgid epiphany “inspired” Roncalli to move beyond
the excruciating doubt that afflicted him (that is to say, as to whether
the impetus that motivated him was divine or diabolical) — by the Age
of Aquarius, John XXIII, infatuated with the world, rashly and needlessly
convoked a Council to deal with a problem that did not exist until he
created it.
We invite you to view a vignette of the Holy Catholic Church as it really
was — and is no longer. The pictures indeed speak more than any words:
http://www.boston-catholic-journal.com/the-real-legacy-of-vatican-II-a-renewal-that-became-a-requiem-the-death-of-two-monasteries.htm
. And, while I think of it, Vatican II as the Model of the Failed Corporation:
http://www.boston-catholic-journal.com/vatican-ii-the-model-of-the-failed-corporation.htm
We also invite you to return to the image at the top of this page —
to the time when the poisons called Modernism and Ecumenism
were first injected into the Body of Christ — and to behold a prophetic
vision of what it would become. It is frightening. All that is counterfeit
and ugly always is.
Some of Pericle Fazzini’s other Obscenities
________________________
1
https://www.history.com/news/aztec-human-sacrifice-religion
2 History of the Council of Trent, by Cardinal Francesco Maria
Sforza Pallavicini, translated to Latin by Fr. Giattini, SJ (Antwerp,
1670)
Geoffrey K. Mondello
Editor
editor@boston-catholic-jounal.com
Boston Catholic Journal
www.boston-catholic-journal.com
September 3, 2019
Printable PDF Version
|