Life at the Cost of Death:
the Tainted Covid-19 Vaccines
-
Catechism of the Catholic Church:
“One may not do evil so that good may result from it.” (CCC 1761)
Vatican
(Jorge and Friends):
There are: “differing degrees of responsibility of cooperation
in evil.”
Today,
Jorge’s (Francis’s) response to the growing concern of the vaccines’
use of stem cells from human fetal tissue 1 is all the more
barbaric and absurd:
“why not
take it?”,
he casually asked. That a third-grader could answer this, understanding
the context, borders not on absurdity but insanity:
“because
an innocent baby was killed to get it!”.
That Jorge is no theologian is a given; but that he lacks the intellectual
perspicacity of an 8-year-old
is truly astounding. And frightening — because he then went on to
urge its universal use as an ethical imperative! Indeed,
he went so far as to demand that “it
must be done.” Morality apart, could he have asked
a more incredulous question
given the many, many, unanswered questions and unanticipated side-effects
concerning the proffered vaccine that has already killed some in the
taking?
Since
when
were we allowed by God and Holy Mother
Church to have
ANY
responsibility in evil, much less to “cooperate”
with evil in any way and to any degree?!
Saint Paul himself condemns this evil sophistry thus:
“we are slandered
… as some affirm that we say, “let us do evil, that there may come good.”
[And their] damnation is just.”
(Romans 3.8)
KINDA
DEAD
To say that “One
may not do evil so that good may result from it” — period! — in no way
invokes, or even admits of, any specious notion of
“degree”.
It is much like saying that the person one killed is
either dead — or is not. There is no middle way.
There are no “differing
degrees” of death and being dead.
This is formally called “casuistry” — the use of sophistical reasoning,
the appeal to equivocal, deliberately abstruse, and oversubtle principles
or reasoning to justify what is manifestly wrong — in this case, evil.
It is aptly described as “Jesuitical casuistry” (Jorge is a Jesuit)
— addressing moral issues not by appealing to indefeasible precepts,
but to isolated instances abstracted from any moral principles to the
end of either attenuating them or abrogating them altogether. In other
words, it is simply another tiresome iteration of the bankrupt notion
of “situation ethics”: there are no absolutes and no moral precept is
immutable.
We are called in no uncertain terms to
be good
— not evil. To
do good
— not evil. Always. Everywhere. At all times.
In fact, Christ tells us that we must be
perfect
even as His Heavenly Father is perfect. (Saint Matthew 5.48)
Christ never said that you are to be good
“only insofar as …”
— or that it is
“morally legitimate”
to be complicit in evil
“to a certain degree”.
Neither has the Church ... only her increasingly evil “princes”.
That is the casuistry of the World, the Jesuits, and the Evil One.
A few babies, we are told, were murdered 60 years ago — but somehow
“parts” of their tissues were … inadvertently, mind you … kept. Not
for “research”, you understand … they were just — somehow — conveniently
stored for no reason at all! What is more, they were “somehow” kept
in a viable state for over half a century — by “scientists”, “biologists”,
and “physicians”, no less! What a remarkable coincidence that they were
serendipitously “just found” — and quite suddenly and unexpectedly became
“useful”! We are amazed at this concatenation of totally unanticipated
and otherwise unrelated series of events! More amazing still is that
such evil does indeed have pe-DEGREE:
Unit 71 of the
Handbook on Moral Sophistry
Remarkably,
it is not, however, important now (you will soon see why I emphasize
“now”) that a baby was killed and its organs “harvested” — after all,
the murder happened 60 years ago — so it’s okay. As the years go by,
we are to understand, culpability is commensurably diminished with time
until culpability no longer exists — despite the parts remaining. Oh,
yes, in the present case they are only “little parts” — so that somehow
makes the crime “little”, too.
The crime, we are implicitly given to understand, is only commensurable
to tissue size and weight. The mitral valve in your heart is small,
about a half-inch to just under an inch. According to this reasoning,
then, a lung that measures roughly 10 inches in height (or 20 times
larger than the mitral valve) is more vital (valuable) than a mitral
valve. After all, it is larger — and eo ipso more important! That one
can live without one lung for 80 years (like Jorge!) but cannot without
a mitral valve 1/20th its size for little more than five seconds, is
only of superficial significance. And stem cells are smaller still!
And what is more, they do not count as the products of murder ... since
it was committed 60 years ago!
As we had said earlier: these murders happened 60 years ago — so it’s
okay! If murder was committed yesterday, then, it is of far greater
gravity than had it been committed last year — and it diminishes in
gravity and culpability as the weeks, months, and years pass, until
it no longer attains to being murder at all. This is not juridical reasoning,
still less moral reasoning. In fact, there is no reasoning at all. It
simply falls under the auspices of liberal “policy” articulated in the
proposition that “ABORTION-is-not-understood-as-the-murder-of-a-baby-and-so-it’s-okay”
— the logically indefensible tenet of Planned Parenthood and the Democratic
Party at large.
Do not be shocked by the moral indifference of our scientific
“caregivers” — they are largely the product of other ghouls from
earlier historical nightmares. Do a search on
Unit 7312
and Operation Paperclip
3.
American doctors, scientists, biologists and virologists, among
others, eagerly poured into those abattoirs to take notes on the
Japanese “experiments” before they could be destroyed — and even
granted the death-dealers immunity as a trade for their findings in
the bodies subjected to vivisection and every imaginable torture!
Almost as frightening as this, is that there is no existing record
or account of pangs of conscience from these ... academics. No moral
outrage. Only sterile scientific notes, and the picking of the bones
of the dead.
_________________________
2
https://www.nytimes.com/1995/03/17/world/unmasking-horror-a-special-report-japan-confronting-gruesome-war-atrocity.html
3
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Paperclip
Geoffrey K. Mondello
Editor
Boston Catholic Journal
Printable PDF Version
Comments? Write us:
editor@boston-catholic-journal.com
Totally Faithful to the Sacred
Deposit of Faith entrusted to the Holy See in Rome
“Scio
opera tua ... quia modicum habes virtutem, et servasti verbum
Meum, nec non negasti Nomen Meum”
“I
know your works ... that you have but little power, and
yet you have kept My word, and have not denied My Name.”
(Apocalypse
3.8)
Copyright © 2004 - 2022 Boston Catholic
Journal. All rights reserved. Unless otherwise stated, permission
is granted by the Boston Catholic Journal for the copying
and distribution of the articles and audio files under the
following conditions: No additions, deletions, or
changes are to be made to the text or audio files in any
way, and the copies may not be sold for a profit. In the
reproduction, in any format of any image, graphic, text,
or audio file, attribution must be given to the Boston Catholic
Journal.
|
|
