Suggested Reading:

Learn your Faith through this free series of  video presentations by
Dominican Friars

St. Thomas Institute

St. Thomas Institute

ope Saint Pius V

Pope Saint Pius V pray for Holy Mother Church, for Heresies abound

Pray for Holy Mother Church,
for heresies abound

Boston Catholic Journal

Write us:

Boston Catholic Journal





















































































































































































































































































Boston Catholic Journal - Critical Catholic Commentary in the Twilight of Reason



A Deadly Silence

“Who among you, if your son or ox falls into a cistern, would not immediately pull him out on the Sabbath day?” But they were unable to answer his question.” (Saint Luke 14:1-6)


“But they kept silent ....”

If the scholars of the Law concede that they would pull out their son or their ox (which, of course, they would), then they acknowledge that they would be willing to break the Law — albeit for a good.

If they do not concede that they would pull their son or ox out, then they are liars.

There is no middle way — as we find so often in the teachings, and always in the most important teachings, of Jesus Christ. It is not that a “middle way
” is denied us — there is no “middle way” to be denied of us.

To the Scholars, the Law was an inexpungable good. To pull a man or an animal out of a pit is also an undeniable and necessary good. But if you do the second you violate the first.

Just as you cannot choose between two evils without incurring sin, it would appear, at least in this confrontation between Jesus and the Scholars of the Law, that you equally cannot choose between two goods without incurring sin.

Something is wrong, and they know it, so they are quiet.

Quite an enigma, yes?

Do not be hasty in dealing harshly with them. How would you answer? In fact, how do you answer this nearly every day?

You do. In your choices.

You must choose. You cannot, not choose. In not choosing you know that you have already made a choice, but have only pretended to have no complicity in the consequences of that choice.

There is no Middle Way

Most of our moral choices, in the end, are rarely choices between good and evil, between what very clearly presents itself as either indefeasibly good or irredeemably evil.

In fact, we never knowingly choose what is evil for us, what is harmful to us (even the suicide thinks that he is doing a good: hoping to escape the pain of this life in the hope of a better one, or no life at all.)

In essence, it is not in our metaphysical and moral constitution to willingly choose irredeemable evil.

But we are clever, and still look for a path that spurs off the road, and circumvents the choice, a path that will not compel us to call good, “good” and evil, “evil.” We wish to prove, to justify, ourselves, our cleverness to God. So perverse is this impulse that we are prepared to deliberately choose evil in order to assert our autonomy from God, our independence from any binding moral law.

However, even to consciously choose something that is evil, “as evil”, is ineluctably to choose a good: the good of autonomy, of freely choosing — the perceived good of positing, of proving, that such choices held to be impossible, are, in fact, possible after all, through the exercise of the will. This ultimately spurious “overcoming” of the impossible is perceived, pursued, as a good, however intrinsically evil the consequences are upon having attained it, for even the “perceived” good of the achievement will not exceed the very real evil that it necessarily entails. It is, in the end, a factitious effort to translate evil into good.

We are very clever at concealing this from ourselves, at explaining away our sinful choices. The fact of the matter is that real moral decisions involve competing goods apart from glaring contrasts in light and darkness. We always construe our poor choices as, in some way, good, as beneficial, to us. If we follow the skein, it will always lead to the presumption of a good.

And now you are quiet, too, like the Scholars of the Law. And for the same reason.

Every day you are confronted with competing goods between which you must choose — and for all your subtleties and equivocating, you ultimately do choose.

You must

But do you choose well and wisely? In choosing one good, you forsake another. Fidelity is a good. So is sexual pleasure.

How do you choose? Both are good and both are incompatible (except in marriage — for those of you who are quibblers).

Ultimately the answer does not depend on which you choose — but on what you choose — really, on what you have already chosen. For in choosing the what, you will immediately and concomitantly choose the how.

Your choices are only two: yourself ... or God. There are no other choices. Every other nuance of choice is just an inflection of the one or the other.

Which you choose will depend on what you have already chosen.

“Which would I choose?” — or “Which would God have me choose?”

You will immediately utter the latter if you have already chosen God — and the “which” that you choose will follow from it.

The Scholars of the Law knew this, too, and were silent because they cherished what they wished to keep and what God wished them to surrender. In this sense, it was a deadly silence ... that ultimately became a deafening silence.

Choose God, then. In all things. At all times.

Everything else will follow.


Geoffrey K. Mondello
Boston Catholic Journal

   Printable PDF Version

Comments? Write us:


Boston Catholic Journal

Totally Faithful to the Sacred Deposit of Faith entrusted to the Holy See in Rome

Scio opera tua ... quia modicum habes virtutem, et servasti verbum Meum, nec non negasti Nomen Meum 
I know your works ... that you have but little power, and yet you have kept My word, and have not denied My Name. (Apocalypse 3.8)


Copyright © 2004 - 2024 Boston Catholic Journal. All rights reserved. Unless otherwise stated, permission is granted by the Boston Catholic Journal for the copying and distribution of the articles and audio files under the following conditions:  No additions, deletions, or changes are to be made to the text or audio files in any way, and the copies may not be sold for a profit. In the reproduction, in any format of any image, graphic, text, or audio file, attribution must be given to the Boston Catholic Journal.





The Face

The Face and the Culmination of Vatican II

and the
of Vatican II

Search the Boston Catholic Journal

Basic Catholic

Free Catholic Audio Library
in Latin & English

Audio Books,
devotions, and
isten to them
or download them

completely free

You Cannot Build Down

Archbishop Fulton Sheen - The Fourth Great Crisis in the Church - The End of Christendom
The Destruction
of everything in the Past

Archbishop Fulton Sheen




Baltimore Catechism - the most authoritative Catholic Catechism ever printed

Discover what
the Church

has taught for

2000 Years
before Vatican II

Newly Formatted
with hyperlinks
for improved readability

Read online

Download the PDF

The Little Office

The Little Office of the Blessed Virgin Mary
of the
Blessed Virgin Mary

Pope Pius V Catechism of Trent

Catechism of the Council of Trent New Edition

New Edition (free)

A Primer for

A Primer for Catholic Symbolism

Catholic Symbolism

Listen to
this Catholic Spiritual Classic:

The Practice of the Presence of God - an audio Presentation

The Practice
of the
of God

Complete Audio Files

Novena to
St Jude

 Novena to St Jude Printable 4-fold with one piece of paper

Printable Booklet
on 1 sheet
of paper, 4-fold, free

With Mary in the Rose Garden

With Mary Immaculate, Mother of God in the Rose Garden
Reflections on the Rosary
with a Poor Clare Nun and
Saint Padre Pio

Pope Saint Pius X
Pray for us

Pope Saint Pius X pray for us

“I shall spare myself neither
care nor labor nor vigils for
the salvation of souls”