
CRITICAL CATHOLIC COMMENTARY
in the Twilight of Reason

Mary, Conceived without
Sin,
pray for us who
have recourse to Thee

Are We all Children of God
... no
matter what?
While in Singapore,
Indonesia, Francis made the following statement:
“All religions are
a path to God. “They are
like different languages in order
to arrive at God, but God is God
for all and Since God is God for
all, then we are all children of
God. There’s only one God, and each
of us has a language to arrive at
God. Some are Sikh, Muslim, Hindu,
Christian, and they are different
paths to God.” 1
Notice that Francis doesn’t say, “different
gods,” but rather, speaks in the
singular: God (one God) who he very
clearly identifies as the same God
worshipped differently in each respective
religion. Apart from recognizing the
historical significance of this openly
heretical statement, it is also that for
Francis to speak very clearly and
unambiguously about virtually
anything is extremely
rare and therefore noteworthy.
I will not attempt to parse the logical
contradictions glaringly inherent in such
a statement. I will leave logic aside and
let the different religions, or Francis’s
“different paths to God,” decide
the matter for us among themselves. What
do you say?
Muslims will strongly, and rightly,
disagree with the statement that the Holy
Trinity, that is to say, the Christian God,
and Allah, are the same. They are
not! The Muslim will tell you in
no uncertain terms — even vehemently
— that Francis is a liar!
The Muslim Imam knows this … but the Catholic
Pope, together with his coterie of Vatican
II Ecumenists, does not.
I wonder if he is prepared to correct
his Muslim “brothers” as he walks the
“Synodal Way of Accompaniment” with
them on the road to the Kaaba in
Mecca … where only Muslims are allowed
to enter.
So … Francis is very clear about both: who
we
are, and who
God
is:
-
“we are
all
children of God
-
and
there is
only one
God … Sikh, Muslim, Hindu,
Christian … it matters not:
-
all are
different
… but the same —
and the only ones who do not realize
this are the gods themselves and the
practitioners of each religion ...
-
nevertheless ... because the
distinction between them is ultimately
illusory in the “Ecumenical”
purview,
all differences and contradictions
are, in some incomprehensible manner,
fantastically reconciled such that,
despite all doctrines, teachings, dogmas,
creeds, beliefs, rituals, and
appearances,
they each and equally constitute
certain paths to the one same God.
Oh, yes ... and even
if my God calls your god an
idol and a demon — which our
God does:
“Declare his glory among the nations
... he is terrible to all the gods,
because all the gods of the nations
are demons, but the Lord made the
heavens.”
(Psalm
96.3–5)
God, then, is whatever and whomever we wish
him to be — and every path ... however
divergent from, and contradictory
to, every other path,
is a certain way to a god of our choosing
who, despite every conflicting ascription,
every incompatible predication — strangely
enough turns out to be our own god
... also! And we never knew it. This is
not just theological, but inescapably
logical nonsense.
But does it sound strangely familiar? It
should:
On June 14, 2017 Francis made the following
statement:
“Is it possible God has some children He
does not love?
No! We are all
God’s beloved children.”
2
In light of his vitriolic denunciation of
Catholic Tradition in favor of Ecumenism
— an altogether heretical concept prior
to Vatican II — and one which Francis
resolutely promotes at the cost of
authentic Catholicism, it is not
surprising in the least that he asks this
question — as though the question itself
is altogether rhetorical ... already answered
in its being asked: “Of course, not!”
And what is more troubling still … is
that this question is … in fact … received
by most post-Conciliar Catholics as merely
rhetorical as well! … that is to say, as
though the answer is already understood
in the asking — and that answer, of course,
is a resounding: “yes — of course!
After all, everyone goes to Heaven.
The pope himself routinely tells us so!”
— despite what Christ teaches us about the
“hard and narrow” way to Heaven:
“Enter in at the
narrow gate: for
wide is the gate,
and broad is the
way that leads to
destruction,
and many there
are who go that
way.
How narrow is the
gate, and strait
is the way that
leads to life:
and
few there are that
find it!
Beware of false
prophets, who come
to you in the clothing
of sheep, but inwardly
they are ravening
wolves.” (St. Mat.
7.15-23)
Oh, yes, concerning the “false prophets,
who come to you in the clothing of sheep,
but inwardly they are ravening wolves,”
may we suggest that you consider five:
1.
John XXIII
2.
Paul VI
3. John Paul I
4. John Paul II
3. and the APEX WOLF: Francis
That is to say, in short, every
pontiff who instigated, promoted, or was
complicit in what we have come to know as
Vatican II which decimated the Church and
Religious Orders, contemned and vitiated
Her teachings, effectively abrogated Her
Sacred Tradition, laid siege to Her Sacred
Deposit of Faith, outlawed her language
(Latin), abolished the Mass of the Ages
(Tridentine), defiled the Sanctuary with
women “Ministers” of Communion
(note that they are no longer designated
“Extraordinary-ministers”), secularized
the Liturgy, and homosexualized Her priests,
bishops, and cardinals — so this includes
every pope that you may have admired
since 1958).
Consider the following: Catholic Mass
attendance was 75+% in 1955 and plunged
to 20-30% in 2017. In 1970, 55 % of
American Catholics went to Mass every Sunday,
and in 2019 that figure dwindled to 20%.
“The Center for Church Management at
Villanova University projects an attendance
rate in the neighborhood of 12 percent by
next year or the year after.”
3 “Altar girls” vastly outnumber “Altar-Boys” and both are “socially/correctly”
called “Altar Servers” — thereby
abolishing any distinction in gender in
deference to the rise of “Woman Church”
and the poison of Feminism.
All this — all of it — is the
fruit of Vatican II ... every effeminate
and recreant priest, bishop, and cardinal;
the feminization and homosexualization of
nearly every aspect of the Catholic Church
— has left it in ruins, pallid and prostate
before the World which it loves more than
God. There are good and faithful
traditional priests — who are persecuted
mercilessly by their bishops, cardinals
... and even the pope. Good men. Manly men.
Priests of Almighty God! Men who do not
lisp — and who would die before kissing
the Muslim Quran! Not so Francis. Not so!
In our pursuit of Truth — Who is,
and Which is, nothing less than Jesus Christ
Himself — you must soberly ask yourself:
does Vatican II really sound like
a success story to you? If yes, then I suggest
that you go to the essay “Vatican
II: The Model of the Failed Corporation”
.
We might take the earlier citation from
Holy Scripture (St. Mat.7.15-23) as a prologue
merely to the many disagreements between
Francis and Jesus Christ in this matter
and many, many others. Consider the following:
Jesus Christ:
-
“You
do the works of your
father. Why do you not know
my speech. Because you cannot
hear my word. You are of your
father the devil, and the
desires of your father you
will do. He was a murderer from
the beginning, and he stood not
in the truth because truth is not
in him. He is a liar and the
father of lies.” (St.
John 8.41-44)
-
“He
that commits sin is of the devil:
for the devil sinned from the beginning.
In this the children of God are
manifest, and the children
of the devil: Whosoever
is not just, is not of God, nor
he that loves not his brother.”
(1 John3.8-10)
-
“Not
everyone that says to me, Lord,
Lord, shall enter into the Kingdom
of Heaven: but he that doeth the
will of My Father who is in Heaven,
he shall enter into the kingdom
of heaven. Many will say to me in
that day: Lord, Lord, have we not
done many miracles in Thy name?
And then will I profess unto them,
I never knew you:
depart from Me, you that work
iniquity.” (St. Mat.7.21-23)
Clearly, then, there are children whose
Father, according to Christ, is God
— that is to say, the children of
God; and there are children whose
Father is the devil — which is to say,
children of the devil!
And yet …according to Francis, “We
are all God’s beloved
children”
Whom do we Believe?
The point is simply this: whom shall we
believe? The Master or the servant? Truth
Himself — Who stood before Pontius Pilate
on the day He was crucified while Pilate
pedantically asked, “What is Truth?” ...
even as Truth bled in his presence
— or His feckless vicar who either
distorts … or contradicts the truth entrusted
to him?
In other words, are we to believe Truth
Himself …. or His recreant
proxy who speaks in open contradiction
to the Truth?
In 1521 Luther wrote to Philip Melanchthon
(Luther’s closest collaborator in heresy):
“Love God and sin boldly ... No sin can
separate us from Him, even if we were to
kill or commit adultery thousands of
times each day.”
7
The correspondence between Francis’s,
“Is it possible that God has some children
He does not love? No! We are all God’s beloved
children.” and Martin Luther’s “No
sin can separate us from Him, even if we
were to kill or commit adultery thousands
of times each day.” is unmistakable.
This is the most manifest and deadly fruit
of the heresy called Ecumenism.
Therefore, despite all that Christ
taught us, no matter what we do,
say, promote, believe, or not believe, is
irrelevant. No sin is so heinous, no act
so horrendous, no belief so criminal, no
unbelief so absolute, that it can disqualify
us from going to Heaven with all the other
... “Saints” ... like Hitler, Josef Mengele,
Stalin, Hideki Tojo, Nero, Mao Zedong, Genghis
Khan, Caligula, and Diocletian, to name
a few. For Francis, these men — despite
the magnitude of their malevolence and the
enormity of their atrocities ... are nevertheless
“God’s beloved children.”
Who can so much as conceptualize God
uttering something like,
“These are my beloved children: Adolf and his brothers
Diocletian, Mao, Josef and Stalin;
Tojo, Nero, Genghis, and Caligula.”?
Who, indeed, is their father?
Are they the “beloved children of God” whom
Francis would have us believe — or are they
those of whom Christ spoke: “You are
of your father the devil.”
They cannot be both.
Either Christ is a deceiver —
or Francis is.
However, being God with the Father and
the Holy Ghost, Christ can neither deceive
nor be deceived.6
Francis can, will, and does.
“Such a harsh, even cruel statement!”
you will reproach me.
Less harsh, I will respond, and far less
frightening than the words of Christ at
the Last Judgment:
“And when the Son of Man shall come
… He shall separate them one from
another, as the shepherd separate
the sheep from the goats: He shall
set the sheep on His right hand,
but the goats on His left. Then
… He shall say to them also that
shall be on His left hand: depart
from Me, you cursed, into everlasting
fire which was prepared for the
devil and his angels.”
8
The god of Francis, it turns out, is
not the God of Sacred Scripture. He
fabricates his god to assuage the guilt
and fear of men — the better to accord with
the World, the Flesh, and primeval things
of darkness that have no place in the Light
...
Let us be Clear:
At this point, whether or not the Seat of
Saint Peter is vacant, is quite beside the
point:
That it is occupied
by a heretic, a polytheist, and a madman,
is by now very clear to anyone not on a
career path in Rome.
Some popes have been Saints. Some have
been scoundrels. Francis, regrettably, is
certainly and most notoriously among the
latter — and we will not, cannot, accept
his repudiation of Jesus Christ Himself
in Sacred Scripture together with the perennial
teachings of the Holy Catholic Church and
the many heretical credenda foisted on the
Church by that most unfortunate event called
Vatican II; that is to say, Francis’s chimerical
understanding of himself — as the paradigm
of Conciliar progressivism — and, lately,
polytheism, in not pantheism — and also
as the law-giver preeminent, the law-maker
who tolerates no dissent — indeed,
who punishes it ruthlessly — does
not coincide with the 2000-year-old
understanding of the Petrine Office in the
Economy of Salvation. Francis is a vicar
only. Not the Master.
Does a mere Vicar dare correct his Lord
or amend His mandates? Of course not!
Therefore does Christ say:
“Amen, amen I say to you: The servant
is not greater than his Lord; neither
is the Apostle greater than He that
sent him.” (St. John 14.16)
Must we therefore follow his teachings?
We will let Pope Innocent III,
arguably the most effective pope ever,
answer this:
“It is necessary to obey a pope in all things as long as he does
not go against the universal customs
of the Church, but should he
go against the universal customs
of the Church he need not be followed.”
9
Francis, however, has done something
more sinister still — something that no
other pope preceding him, however corrupt,
had done: He made the Catholic
Church unrecognizable.
Geoffrey
K. Mondello
Editor
Boston Catholic Journal
Printable
PDF Version
Comments? Write us:
editor@boston-catholic-journal.com
_______________________________________________
1
https://cruxnow.com/2024-pope-in-timor-leste/2024/09/pope-in-multi-faith-singapore-says-all-religions-are-a-path-to-god
2
vatican.va/content/francesco/en/audiences/2017/documents/papafrancesco_20170614/we-dont-earn-gods-love-its-freely-given-pope-francis-says
3
https://www.thecatholicthing.org/2021/04/17/the-american-church-going-going/
4 St.
John 14.24 — St. Mat.17.17-19 — St. John3.18
— St. John8.41-44 — 1 St. John 3.8-10.
5
St. John 14.6 “I am the way,
and the truth, and the life. No man comes
to the Father, but by Me.”
6
St.
John 18:38 “Pilate
saith to Him: What is truth?”
7
https://www.thegospelcoalition.org/article/did-luther-really-tell-us-to-love-god-and-sin-boldly/
8
St. Mat 25.31-33 & 25.41
9
https://www.newadvent.org/cathen/08013a.htm
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Three Pious Practices
for Every Devout Catholic

Gloria, Tea and Bee:
Recovering the Disreputable
There
are
three pious practices
that we
no longer encounter and that had been not just customary, but instinctive
to Catholics — up to 40 or so years ago when the notion of piety fell
into disrepute, together with many of the customs long cherished — and
practiced — by Catholics, not for years, but for centuries. They are
simple things really, that we seldom see because ... well, they are
rarely done and yet of themselves, speak volumes of our loss (perhaps
a calculated deprivation, actually) of the sacred.
Let me give you both the long and the short of it. Here is the short:
-
We no longer bow our heads at the Sacred Name of Jesus (see Philippians
2.5-11)
-
We no longer make the Sign of the Cross over our hearts or foreheads
when we pass by a Catholic Church where Christ dwells, really and
truly, in the Blessed Sacrament.
-
We no longer make reparation whenever
we hear the Sacred Name of Jesus uttered blasphemously.
We have lost collective memory of things instinctually Catholic. Much
of it has been superannuated by “policy” or simply jettisoned in what
became a totally unilateral effort at ecumenism in which the Church
embraced, en masse, much historically alien to it — with absolutely
no other denomination embracing anything remotely “Catholic” in return.
The Church surrendered much unique to its identity. The other “communions”
wisely surrendered nothing. This is not to say that ecumenism has failed.
It has only failed for Catholics — the only ones who have been resolute
in failing to recognize the obvious.
Now the long version, a vignette really, that captures much of what
once was — not long ago — is no more, and ought to be: (the Boston
Catholic Journal wishes to express its gratitude to P.G. of San
Francisco, formerly of Massachusetts, for the following contribution)
“A
flood of memories
came rushing in upon me one
day recently at Mass.
I noticed an impeccably dressed elderly woman with stark
white hair nodding — not just nodding, but nodding at what
I began to realize were predictable times. To be sure, I
continued to observe this almost imperceptible movement
of her head downward until I became aware that it occurred
precisely each time the priest uttered the Name, “Jesus.”
It did not occur when the priest uttered “Christ”
— except when it was preceded by “Jesus.”
I looked around the congregation and saw to my surprise
that this gentle gesture was accompanied by other nods —
mostly among what one “Minister of Music” derisively described
to me as the “Grayheads.” I even observed it, much to my
surprise, in one young man. Out of a congregation of perhaps
300, I noticed this almost imperceptible but curious behavior
in perhaps five or six parishioners. And always — always
and only — at the Sacred Name of Jesus.
Memories returned. Memories of my father. A tall man (to
me as a child, anyway) with a gentle voice; strong, in the
quiet way that only gentleness can be remarkably strong,
he walked beside me, straight and assured, but not arrogant.
Holding my hand, we walked the several blocks to Church
with my younger brother alternately walking and being carried
effortlessly in the strong arms of my father. It was Sunday
morning 1957. Upon entering Church (Saint Clement’s), he
removed his hat and made sure we blessed ourselves properly.
In those days matrons wore fur stoles that still had the
eyes of the poor Minks still in them, which endlessly fascinated
my brother, and frightened me. Dad had to prevent Mikey
from poking at them during Mass.
It was here that I first remembered Dad nodding his head,
too. I did not know why ... but he did, and so did everyone
else. I remember asking him if his tie was too tight. He
put his fingers to his lips and pointed in the direction
of the Altar. As time went by I began to understand that
one simply nods ones head whenever the name of Jesus was
uttered. Catholics just did that. The priest did it. Dad
did it. Even Mikey did it! And so did Tommy Mason, the freshest
kid on the block! Soon it became second nature, in Church
and out of it. I remember my father gently scolding me once
when I deliberately said the “Holy Name” several times in
a row to make the boys around me nod their heads! I even
did it twice to Aunt Vickie!
But I also noticed two other peculiar things about Dad (and,
in fact, a lot of other Catholics back then). Whenever we
walked in front of a Church — even on the other side of
the street — Dad would make a tiny Sign of the Cross over
his heart in a hidden kind of way, and quietly utter :
“Gloria (presumably Aunt Gloria), Tea and Bee, Dom and knee”.
I thought it a cute riddle that rhymed, although I never
had an Uncle Dom. Later Dad unraveled the mystery to me
one day when I finally asked him who “Dom” was. I distinctly
remember that it was winter, for Dad crouched down beside
me in the snow, threw his muffler around our faces to keep
out the snow and wind, and told me, “It is Latin, son.
“Gloria tibi, Domine”, which means, “Glory to You,
Lord Jesus.” Yup, even as he spoke he nodded his head when
he said “Jesus” — and so did I. I was learning. “Whenever
you pass in front of a Catholic Church you always say that,
son, and make the Sign of the Cross over your heart.” But
Mom does it over her forehead, I protested. “Well, Mamma
is right, too”, he said. “The important thing is that you
always do it, because Jesus is inside the Church.”
Walking, driving, on the bus — wherever — Dad did it and
I felt it was like a little secret between us, and, of course,
Jesus (yes, I just now bowed my head).
There was one other thing that Dad did that stayed with
me all my life. Whenever he spoke with someone who was either
angry or just crude and said something like, “Jesus Christ!
I told him he was a crook!” or, “Jesus, was I
angry!”, I noticed that Dad very unobtrusively did two
things! First, of course, he slightly bowed his head. Then
he would usually cross his arms and underneath them secretly
make a small, totally unnoticeable movement with his thumb,
pressing it against his heart.
It took a long time for me to catch on to that one.
Again, it was something he did so naturally and quietly
that it almost escaped me. “Dad,” I later asked, after he
had a very animated conversation with one of my uncles,
“what do you do with your thumb when people are angry, like
Uncle Mario was a few minutes ago? And why?” This really
escaped me — but stayed with me all my life as perhaps no
other gesture he taught me.
He paused a moment, as though trying to look for simple
words to explain it.
“What,” he asked me, is the Third Commandment?” I told him,
“Thou shalt not take the name of the Lord thy God in vain.”,
proud that I remembered it quickly (back then we had
to memorize them and Nuns taught us our Catechism — and
boy, you had better remember!)
“Well,” Dad continued, “Uncle Mario just used the Lord’s
Name in vain. Instead of just letting it pass as blasphemy
(I did not know what “blasphemy” exactly was at the time,
but knew it was not good) against God, I just “finished”
the sentence for him, adding, “Have mercy on us”
and striking my heart as we do at Mass. That way, it brings
something good out of a sin — I make it an opportunity to
ask God’s mercy both for Uncle Mario and for myself.”
I began to understand what kind of man my father really
was — and what kind of man I should try to be, too. So often
it is the little things a person does — especially when
they don’t know that they are being observed — that leave
the most lasting impressions.
Dad would not recognize most Catholics today. Neither, I
think, would Saint Paul. What was second nature to them
seems to have disappeared altogether — except for a few of
those beautiful elderly women or old men at Mass.”
P.G.
San Francisco, CA
|
Sad to say,
not only do the laity no longer exercise these pious and beautiful practices
— but neither do our priests or bishops. They use what Catholics once
called the “Sacred Name” with no reverence, attaching to it a significance
apparently no greater than any other name that passes from their lips.
But it was not always so. For many, many centuries it was not so. But
piety has become so … disreputable in our time. It is a term
of disdain, a concept fraught with an intolerable “otherworldliness”
that no longer has a place in our time, and in our world.
What P.G., I think, was alluding to when he wrote that Saint Paul would
probably not recognize most Catholic today, is this:
“Christ
Jesus, Who being
in the form of God, thought it not robbery to be equal with
God: But emptied himself, taking the form of a servant,
being made in the likeness of men, and in habit found as
a man. He humbled himself, becoming obedient unto death,
even to the death of the cross. For which cause God also
hath exalted him, and hath given him a name which is above
all names: That at the name of Jesus every knee should
bow, of those that are in heaven, on earth, and under the
earth. And that every tongue should confess that
the Lord Jesus Christ is in the glory of God the Father.”
(Saint Paul’s Epistle to the Philippians 2.5-11)
|
The very Angels in Heaven bow at the name of Jesus ... and even the
demons in Hell.
But
we
are somehow more enlightened than that …somehow
superior to both — such that what is binding upon those in Heaven
and Hell itself, is not binding upon us !
How vastly cultured, how erudite
we now are, unlike those
“backward”
generations who filled the Church (and the Calendar of Saints)
before Vatican II; you know, the
“indietrists”
(the “backwardists”
as Francis had derisively called them)
before Vatican II stamped out most things distinctly Catholic as
impediments to the new evangel of
“Ecumenism.”
How perfectly infused with Sanctifying Grace we have become —
unlike our forebears just two generations past! How learned! How wise! How
discerning! We thank God that we are not like them! (St. Luke 18.11)
What a quantum leap! But I think not of grace — at least for us
who have been made “a little less than the Angels” (Heb. 2.7)
who bow in Heaven at the Sacred Name
—
us, who have made ourselves
less subject to God
than even the demons!
Think about it — and perhaps make a very ancient effort at what is “disreputable”
to the world and more in keeping with your beautiful Catholic identity
of 2000 years past — and what gives glory to God ... and not man.
Geoffrey K. Mondello
Editor
Boston Catholic Journal
Printable
PDF Version
Comments? Write us:
editor@boston-catholic-journal.com
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
The Most Urgent Question of Our Time:
“When
the Son of Man Comes, will He Find Faith on Earth?”
(St. Luke 18.8)
No
more stunning,
no more frightening, and perhaps no more ominously portentous
words are spoken in all the Gospels, in fact, in the
entire New Testament — perhaps even in the entirety
of Sacred Scripture itself; words that have become increasingly
fraught with significance with every passing year of
the most unfortunate papacy of Francis — a papacy not
just likely … but I believe with certainty … will
be understood not simply as among the worst … but the
worst … the most destructive to the Faith and to the
Church in the annals of 2000 years of Church history.
Indeed, with every generation following that devastating
Second Vatican Council — that scorched earth assault
on Tradition and historical Catholicism — the question
increasingly verges on an implied and obvious answer.
Indeed, we must wonder if the question that Christ poses
… “When the Son of Man comes will He find Faith on earth?”
… is, in fact, spoken of this generation, or of one
soon — very soon, to come.
As with so many of Christ’s teachings, this troubling question
is too often and too deftly explained away — especially
by the overwhelming number of the liberal theologians
and bishops who have proliferated and multiplied since
1962 — which is to say, by “the
learned and the wise”. If we heed them, it would
appear that either Christ does not know what He
is saying, or we do not know what He is saying
— although we all agree that He said something
... that sounds suspiciously clear.
We must, however, pay careful attention to these twelve
words, …. perhaps more now than at any
other time in Church history.
“When the Son of Man
comes will He find Faith on earth?”
These are twelve words, however,
to which we must pay careful attention, perhaps more
now than at any other time in Church history.
However reluctant we are to take Christ at His word — which
becomes increasingly inconvenient to us — we must recognize
that Jesus never spoke idly: His words, His teachings
— and yes, His Commandments — were always uttered
to one explicit end: the salvation of souls — attaining
to Heaven and everlasting happiness and to avoiding
Hell and eternal misery.
The Jewish religious authorities —
“the learned” of His own
time — had scornfully dismissed Christ’s warning that
not so much as stone would remain standing in the great
Temple 1
... the very Temple within which, 70 years later, these
words were fulfilled when Rome laid waste in days what
took 46 years to build.
We tend to view such alarming statements made by Jesus
— and there are many — with the same scorn and disdain
today.
Indeed ... what has become of the “Faith of our Fathers?”
A mere fifty years ago we ourselves would have instinctively
replied “Of course He will find faith! There
simply must be some deeper, some obscure and less evident
meaning to this that we do not presently understand
— and what He appears to be saying, He is
not really saying at all. Surely the “learned” of
our own day can deftly explain the answer to this troubling
question. In the end, they will conclude, Jesus is
really asking something entirely different from what
He appears to be asking and that it has nothing
to do with our very real defection from the Faith.”
It is likely that many Jews of Jesus’ time — both the learned
and the unlearned — had replied in much the same way.
In fact, they did.
In other words, to us, our faith, the Faith of the Catholic
Church for two millennia, could no sooner disappear
than ... well, the stones of the great Temple 2000 years
ago!
If, however, we take a careful inventory of our present
and undeniably dismal and increasingly scandalous situation
in the Church — especially as it has unfolded in the
last five decades — Jesus does not quite appear as ...
“perplexing” ... as so many apparently make Him to be.
Candidly Ask yourself the following:
Has the Faith — the Catholic Faith — flourished
in the last 50 years, or has it withered?
Are vocations to the Priesthood and Religious life
growing or dwindling?
Are Catholics having more children or are they
having fewer children?
Are Missionary efforts, to the end of (dare we
say it?) “conversion” as mandated by Christ
encouraged
as intrinsic to Catholicism — or are they discouraged
as impolite, obtrusive, culturally imperialistic and
inherently inimical to the “Ecumenical spirit of Vatican
II” — especially as interpreted by Pope Francis for
whom “proselytism is solemn nonsense,” to use his own
words, words that mock the sacrifices of countless
missionary saints through the 2000 years preceding Vatican
II’s
“more enlightened”
understanding of the
Great Commission*?
Rather, we find that “conversion” to Christ and His
Church is actively discouraged — that especially
under Pope Francis it is no longer understood as
a holy and inherently necessary endeavor — instead,
it is disdained, even dismissed, as “socially and culturally
incorrect” — indeed, we find that promoting our
Catholic Faith — as Christ has commanded us to—
has been forbidden by Francis and his “progressive”
coterie of feckless and disaffected cardinals and bishops!
What pope, prior to Vatican II, could ever have envisioned
this?
Is our understanding of the Catholic Church, as an
absolutely unique institution indispensable to the
ordinary means of salvation, emphasized as urgently
today (if it is emphasized at all) as it was a hundred
years ago? Fifty years ago? Indeed, is the concept itself
— of the singularity and indispensability of the Holy
Catholic Church — still deemed an actual dogma
and a viable concept at all?
For all our insolence and equivocation, we know the
answers, and we are uncomfortable with them, for they
fly in the face of Christ and all that He taught — to
say nothing of Sacred Scripture, Holy Tradition, and
the Sacred Deposit of the Faith entrusted to the Catholic
Church by God Himself.
Indeed, Christ’s question takes on a greater sense of
urgency still, for the sheep are scattered and confused
as never before. The papacy of Francis has been disastrous
for the Church. Why? Precisely because he has taken
Vatican II to its logical conclusion: the irrelevance
of the Church.
Ubi
est Pastor?
Where is the Shepherd?
Who is earnestly addressing this spiritual malaise and
religious decay due to the indolence and dereliction
of the vast majority of American and European bishops
who appear far more eager for secular plaudits than
the now quaint and discredited notion of “the salvation
of souls.” Pope Francis has effectively declared this
mandate defunct in favor of the rehabilitation of bodies,
societies, economies, and “the environment”. That the
passing material environment of man is infinitely
less important than the eternal abode of his
soul, often appears to elude Francis. Indeed, it appears
to elude most Catholics whose mantra increasingly coincides
with the world’s: Social activism! ... not
interior conversion away from this world ... and
to Christ.
Shame! Shame on us! By our silence, our fear of being
disparaged by “other Catholics” for the sake of Christ,
we condone this travesty — are complicit in it
... even promote it!
What will motivate
us to recognize, and to redress, this frightful and
ultimately deadly state of affairs?
There are, after all, other contenders in this world
for the souls of men ... seen and unseen! As our own
wick smolders, others blaze! The burning Crescent of
Islam, poised like a scimitar, and every bit as deadly,
glows and grows in the east, and with it, not an
ethnic, but a Religious Cleansing
to which the world remains indifferent — an expunging
of every vestige of Christianity in partibus infidelium.
And even Islam has its secular collaborators: the European
Union — once a continent raised up from utter barbarism
to a civilization formed and ennobled by its Catholic
heritage — will no longer tolerate the inclusion of
its indissoluble Christian heritage within its Constitution.
Not only does it thoroughly repudiate its own Christian
cultural heritage — it prohibits it — even
banishes it! This is nothing less than self-loathing.
And perhaps it ought to be.
Surely, then, in our effort to remedy this impending
state of dissolution, we will first turn to our bishops,
since they are, preeminently, the “Teachers and Guardians
of the Faith”. But more often than not — much more often
than not — in the well-appointed office at the end of
the corridor we do not find a shepherd of souls but
a deeply sequestered, occasionally avuncular, and predictably
remote ... “administrator.”
Relegating his prime responsibility as Teacher and Promoter
of the Faith ... to others, in the form of Lay committees
and subcommittees largely “chaired” by liberal Catholics
more concerned with social issues than the salvation
of souls, are we confident that the patrimony of our
faith will somehow percolate through this strata of
already contaminated soil and reach our children authentically
and intact? Is our fear mitigated ... or further exacerbated
... by our bishops’ resolute lack of diligence in being
attentive to what Catholic colleges and theologians
in their own dioceses are really teaching — and who
are teaching the teachers ... who, in turn, are teaching
our children?
Do you think that your bishop actually — that is to
say, cognitively — is aware of, or even concerned with
— what the teachers themselves are actually teaching?
Not in this diocese. Not in Boston. In fact, Cardinal
Sean Patrick O’Malley had routinely feted, praised,
and held up as exemplary, the clueless “Catechists”
who churn out our children to the Sacrament of Confirmation
— with no clue whatever of that in which they are being
confirmed. By comparison, even the dismal failure of
our public schools in Boston must be deemed a stunning
success.
For most of us — especially in the Archdiocese of
Boston, but no less elsewhere — the answer is, as
they say, a “no-brainer:” it is a universally
resounding no. Most of us find, to our
growing dismay and deepening cynicism, that our
bishops appear to have “more important,”
more ... “pressing” things to do ... than to communicate
the Faith to the faithful ... especially the children.
Really, we beg the question: if no one teaches the teachers
— who, then, teaches the children? If they are not brought
the faith by those to whom it has been entrusted — the
bishops, the episcopacy — who will bring it to them?
Will they — how can they — acquire the Faith
... if no one brings it to them? Saint Paul is very
clear about this:
“How then shall they call
on him, in whom they have not believed? Or how
shall they believe him, of whom they have not
heard? And how shall they hear, without a preacher?
And how shall they preach unless they be sent
...?” (Romans 10.14-15)
Ask yourself candidly: do you know more ... or less
... of your Catholic faith than your children? Very
likely more — although, in all honesty, it is probably
little. You politely assent to the now quaint Catholic
notion that “parents are the primary teachers of their
children,” but knowing little of your own Faith, you
simply shell out $175.00 per child and pan off this
grave responsibility to others of whom you know nothing,
and who themselves largely know nothing of the faith
they presume to teach. You go through the motions as
careless of what your children are taught in their 10
years of “Religious Education” as your bishop is of
what the teachers teach. 10 years later, and $1500 poorer
per child, you scratch your head and wonder why Johnny
still does not know God, and why Judy never goes to
Mass — and yet we have agreed that you know more than
your children ...
What, then, we must ask — with growing apprehension
— will your children teach their children
...?
What will they — who know even less than you
— teach those who know nothing?
Total Ignorance
The momentum, as we see,
is inexorable — until it culminates in total ignorance:
every generation knows less of their faith than the
generation preceding it. It is, in the end, the devolution
from doctrine to legend, from legend to fiction, and
from fiction to myth.
That is not just a poor, but a stultifying and ultimately
deadly patrimony.
This default — at every level — in transmitting the
authentic Catholic faith intact ... leaves Jesus’
question very suddenly very real.
“Recently, a Gallup poll was
taken on Catholic attitudes
toward Holy Communion. The poll
showed serious confusion among
Catholics about one of the most
basic beliefs of the Church.
Only 30 percent of those
surveyed believe they are
actually receiving the Body and
Blood, soul and divinity of the
Lord Jesus Christ under the
appearance of bread and wine.”
The problem is more than mathematical; as we have seen,
it is exponential. 70% of Catholics do not possess this
most fundamental, this most essential understanding
of the core article of genuine Catholic doctrine: that
“Unless you eat of the flesh of
the Son of Man, and drink His Blood, you have no life
in you.” Heavy stuff!
It is not just a matter of the greatest concern, but
nothing less than a matter of the gravest dereliction
that most Catholics do not realize — do not know — that
the very Mass itself is an abbreviation of “The
Most Holy Sacrifice of the Mass”, and that it is really
a Sacrifice, the actual re-enactment of Calvary
before their very eyes!
This failure of understanding ... culminates in a failure
in Faith. It possesses, in significant ways, the remorseless
characteristics of mathematical certainties. Not understanding,
grasping — having never been taught — the most elementary
features of the faith, how can they be understood to
possess what they have not acquired, and how can they
transmit, pass on, what they do not possess? It is inescapable.
Prognostication, of course, is for fools.
But the words of Christ are certainties that will come
to pass.
“Weep not for Me, but for your
children”,
5
Christ told the sorrowing women on the road to Calvary.
Jesus’ question, then — “When
the Son of Man comes will He find faith on earth?”—
is not a “rhetorical question” at all; it is a question
fraught with enormous significance ... the frightful
answer to which appears to be unfolding before our very
eyes ... but that is if you take Christ at His word
— and given Jesus’ track record on things yet to come,
we would do well and wisely to give pause for more than
thought.
Are you worried now ...? Not nearly enough.
And this is all the more frightening still.
Geoffrey K. Mondello
Editor
Boston Catholic Journal
Comments? Write us:
editor@boston-catholic-journal.com
Printable PDF Version
___________________________________________________________________________
The Holy Catholic Faith
Where is it And Who is Keeping
it?

Has the
Post-Conciliar Church
Lost Custody
of the Faith?
All
indications are that is has
The “Dark Ages” — that disdainful
term for the period in history following the collapse of
the Roman Empire in 476 A.D. until the 15th century
(a period correctly described as the Middle Ages)
is understood by the secular world to have lasted
roughly 1000 years, beginning in Florence, Italy.
Within the post-Conciliar
Catholic Church, however, it appears that the term extends
well beyond the 15th century; indeed, some 500
years beyond it! According to contemporary Catholic thought
articulated within the past five papacies, the “Dark Ages”
really ended in 1965 at the conclusion of the Second
Vatican Council. All the doctrines and teachings prior
to that Council were only imperfectly, deficiently, and
insufficiently articulated or defectively understood.
The 1000 Years of Darkness
Only
the Second Vatican Council finally attained to enlightenment
in the divine economy, and after 1,965 years of suspension,
it alone has provided the final, sufficient, and correct
understanding of God and Church, man and nature. Prior to
that, according to post-Conciliar thought, Catholics had
essentially lived in darkness, specifically the darkness
of the “pre-Conciliar Dark Ages.” It may be said that where
the Rational Enlightenment “saved the world from religion,”
Vatican II saved the Church from Catholicism.
Continue reading
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Martyrology for Today
Semen est sanguis Christianorum (The blood of Christians
is the seed of the Church) Tertullian, Apologeticum,
50
2004 Roman Martyrology by Month
2004 Roman Martyrology

Saturday, August 30th in the Year of Grace 2025
This Day, the Thirtieth Day of August
1.
At Rome in the cemetery of Commodilla on the Ostian Way,
the holy martyrs Felix and Adauctus, who, confessing
Christ together for their undefiled faith, as victors hastened
together to heaven.
2.
Commemoration of sixty holy martyrs, who, at Colonia
Sufetana in Byzacene, after the image of Hermes had been
destroyed, were burned with the fury of the pagans.
3.
At Rome, the commemoration of Saint Pammachius, a senator,
outstanding for his zeal in the faith and generosity to
the poor, by whose piety toward God the Titulus Crescentianus
was established.
4.
In the monastery of Rebais in the district of Meaux in Neustria,
Saint Aegilius, the first abbot.
5.
At Breuil likewise in the district of Meaux, Saint Fiacre,
hermit, who, originally from Ireland, led a solitary
life.
6.
At Thessalonica in Macedonia, Saint Fantinus, called
the Younger, a hermit, who was perfected for Christ
through fasting, vigils, and labors.
7.
At Lucedio in the Subalpine region, Saint Bononius, abbot,
who first led a hermit’s life in Egypt, then on Mount Sinai.
8.
At Trevi in Latium, Saint Peter, who, though unlearned,
cultivated the wisdom of the Gospel in solitude.
9.
At London in England, Saint Margaret Ward, martyr,
who, a married woman, was condemned to death under
Queen Elizabeth the First for having helped a priest, and
at Tyburn, hanged from the gallows, willingly endured martyrdom.
In the same place, blessed martyrs Richard Leigh, priest,
and the laymen Edward Shelley and Richard Martin, Englishmen,
John Roche, an Irishman, and Richard Lloyd, a Welshman,
completed their passion with her: the first because
he was a priest, the others because they had received priests.
10.
At Saluzzo in the Subalpine region, blessed John Juvenal
Ancina, bishop, who, formerly a physician, was among
the first to join the Oratory of Saint Philip Neri.
11.
At Caesaraugusta in Spain, blessed María Rafols, virgin,
who founded the Congregation of the Sisters of Charity
of Saint Anne at the hospital of that city, and governed
it with a strong spirit amid many hardships.
12.
Likewise, at Almería in Spain, the passion of the blessed
martyrs Diego Ventaja Milan, bishop of Almería, and Emmanuel
Medina Olmos, of Guadix, who, led into prison out of
hatred for the name of Christ, bore injuries and insults
with patience until they were killed at night.
13.
On the road between Puebla Tornesa and Villafamés near Castellón
in Spain, blessed Joachim (Joseph) Ferrer Adell, priest
of the Order of Friars Minor Capuchin and martyr,
who attained the promised reward through perseverance unto
martyrdom.
14.
At Santander likewise in Spain, blessed Vincent Cabanes
Badenas, priest of the Third Order of Saint Francis
of the Capuchins of the Sorrowful Virgin and martyr,
who, during the same persecution against the faith, merited
to enter the great banquet.
15.
At Venegono near Varese in Italy, the passing of blessed
Alfredo Ildefonso Schuster, bishop, who, having been
elevated from abbot of Saint Paul Outside the Walls to the
see of Milan, fulfilled the office of shepherd with extraordinary
wisdom for the good of his people.
__________________________________________________________________
And elsewhere in divers places, many other holy martyrs, confessors, and holy virgins.
Omnes sancti Mártyres, oráte pro nobis.
(“All ye Holy Martyrs, pray for us,” from the Litaniae Sanctorum, the Litany of the Saints)
℟. Thanks be to God.
|
The 1956 edition below, issued during the pontificate of Pope Pius XII, is a revision of the typical edition of 1749, which had been promulgated by Pope Benedict XIV remained the foundational text for later updates throughout the 18th–20th centuries up to 2004 — the English translation of which remained the sole source of the Martyrology until the present translation of the 2004 Roman Martyrology by the Boston Catholic Journal in 2025.
|
1956 ROMAN MARTYROLOGY

Saturday, August 30th in the Year of Grace 2025
This Day, the Thirtieth Day of August
The feast of St. Rose of St. Mary,
virgin, whose birthday is the 26th of this month.
At Rome, on the Ostian road, the martyrdom
of the blessed priest Felix, under the emperors Diocletian
and Maximian. After being racked he was sentenced to death,
and as they led him to execution, he met a man who spontaneously
declared himself a Christian, and was forthwith beheaded
with him. The Christians not knowing his name, called him
Adauctus, because he was added
to St. Felix and shared his crown.
Also, at Rome, St. Gaudentia, virgin
and martyr, with three others.
In the same city, St. Pammachius,
a priest distinguished for learning and holiness.
At Colonia Suffetulana, in Africa,
sixty blessed martyrs, who were murdered by
the furious Gentiles.
At Adrumetum, also in Africa, the
Saints Boniface and Thecla, who were the parents of twelve
blessed sons, martyrs.
At Thessalonica, St. Fantinus, confessor,
who suffered much from the Saracens, and was driven from
his monastery, in which he had lived in great abstinence.
After having brought many to the way of salvation, he rested
at last at an advanced age.
In the diocese of Meaux, St. Fiacre,
confessor.
At Trevi, St. Peter, confessor,
who was distinguished for many virtues and miracles. He
is honored in that place, whence he departed for Heaven.
At Bologna, St. Bononius, abbot.
And elsewhere in divers places, many other holy martyrs,
confessors, and holy virgins.
Omnes sancti
Mártyres, oráte pro nobis.
(“All
ye Holy Martyrs, pray for us,” from the Litaniae Sanctorum, the Litany
of the Saints)
Response: Thanks be to God.
|
1959 Roman Martyrology by Month
Why the Martyrs Matter
Each
day we bring you a
calendar, a list really, of the holy Martyrs who had suffered
and died for Christ, for His Bride the Church, and for our holy
Catholic Faith; men and women for whom — and well they knew
— their Profession of Faith would cost them their lives.
They could have repudiated all three (Christ, Church, and Catholic
Faith) and kept their lives for a short time longer (even the
lapsi * only postponed their death — and
at so great a cost!)
What would motivate men, women, even children and entire families
to willingly undergo the most evil and painfully devised tortures;
to suffer death rather than denial?
Why did they not renounce their Catholic Faith when the first
flame licked at their feet, after the first eye was plucked
out, or after they were “baptized” in mockery by boiling water
or molten lead poured over their heads? Why did they not flee
to offer incense to the pagan gods since such a ritual concession
would be merely perfunctory, having been done, after all, under
duress, exacted by the compulsion of the state? What is a little
burned incense and a few words uttered without conviction, compared
to your own life and the lives of those you love? Surely God
knows that you are merely placating the state with empty gestures
…
Did they love their wives, husbands, children — their mothers,
fathers and friends less than we do? Did they value their own
lives less? Were they less sensitive to pain than we are? In
a word, what did they possess that we do not?
Nothing. They possessed what we ourselves are given in the Sacrament
of Confirmation — but cleaved to it in far greater measure than
we do: Faith and faithfulness; fortitude and valor, uncompromising
belief in the invincible reality of God, of life eternal in
Him for the faithful, of damnation everlasting apart from Him
for the unfaithful; of the ephemerality of this passing world
and all within it, and lives lived in total accord with that
adamant belief.
We are the Martyrs to come! What made them so will make us
so. What they suffered we will suffer. What they died for, we
will die for. If only we will! For most us, life will be
a bloodless martyrdom, a suffering for Christ, for the sake
of Christ, for the sake of the Church in a thousand ways outside
the arena. The road to Heaven is lined on both sides with Crosses,
and upon the Crosses people, people who suffered unknown to
the world, but known to God. Catholics living in partibus
infidelium, under the scourge of Islam. Loveless marriages.
Injustices on all sides. Poverty. Illness. Old age. Dependency.
They are the cruciform! Those whose lives became Crosses because
they would not flee God, the Church, the call to, the
demand for, holiness in the most ordinary things of life made
extraordinary through the grace of God. The Martyrology we celebrate
each day is just a vignette, a small, immeasurably small, sampling
of the martyrdom that has been the lives of countless men and
women whom Christ and the Angels know, but whom the world does
not know.
“Exemplum enim dedi vobis”, Christ
said to His Apostles: “I have given you an example.” And His
Martyrs give one to us — and that is why the Martyrs matter.
-
A Martyr is
one who suffers tortures and a violent death for
the sake of Christ and the Catholic Faith.
-
A Confessor
is one who confesses Christ publicly in times of persecution
and who suffers torture, or severe punishment by secular
authorities as a consequence. It is a title given only
given to those who suffered for the Faith —
but was not killed for it —
and who had persevered in the Faith until the
end.
Geoffrey K. Mondello
Editor
editor@boston-catholic-journal.com
Boston Catholic Journal
Note:
We suggest that you explore our newly edited and revised
“De
SS. Martyrum Cruciatibus — The Torments and Tortures of the
Christian Martyrs”
for an in-depth historical account of the sufferings of the
Martyrs.
____________________________
*
Those early Christians who renounced their Catholic Faith
in times of persecution. When confronted with the prospect
of torture and death if they held fast to their faith in
Christ, they denied Him and their Faith through an act of
sacrificing (often incense) to the pagan Roman gods and
in so doing kept their lives and/or their freedom and property.

Totally
Faithful to the Sacred Deposit of Faith entrusted
to the Holy See in Rome
“Scio
opera tua ... quia modicum habes virtutem, et servasti verbum
Meum, nec non negasti Nomen Meum”
“I
know your works ... that you have but little power, and
yet you have kept My word, and have not denied My Name.”
(Apocalypse 3.8)
Copyright © 2004 - 2025 Boston
Catholic Journal. All rights reserved. Unless otherwise
stated, permission is granted by the Boston Catholic Journal
for the copying and distribution of the articles and audio
files under the following conditions: No additions,
deletions, or changes are to be made to the text or audio
files in any way, and the copies may not be sold for a profit.
In the reproduction, in any format of any image, graphic,
text, or audio file, attribution must be given to the Boston
Catholic Journal.
|
|