CRITICAL CATHOLIC COMMENTARY
in the Twilight of Reason
Mary, Conceived without
Sin,
pray for us who have
recourse to Thee
The Most Urgent Question of Our Time
“When the Son of Man
Comes, will He Find Faith on Earth?”
(St. Luke
18.8)
No more stunning, no more
frightening, and perhaps no more ominously portentous words
are spoken in all the Gospels, in fact, in the entire New
Testament — perhaps even in the entirety of Sacred Scripture
itself; words that have become increasingly fraught with
significance with every passing year of the most unfortunate
papacy of Francis — a papacy not just likely … but I
believe with certainty … will be understood not simply as
among the worst … but the worst … the most destructive to
the Faith and to the Church in the annals of 2000 years of
Church history.
Indeed, with every generation following that devastating
Second Vatican Council — that scorched earth assault on
Tradition and historical Catholicism — the question
increasingly verges on an implied and obvious answer.
Indeed, we must wonder if the question that Christ poses …
“When the Son of Man comes will He find Faith on earth?” …
is, in fact, spoken of this generation, or of one soon —
very soon, to come.
As with so many of Christ’s teachings, this troubling
question is too often and too deftly explained away —
especially by the overwhelming number of the liberal
theologians and bishops who have proliferated and multiplied
since 1962 — which is to say, by “the
learned and the wise”. If we heed them, it would
appear that either Christ does not know what He is
saying, or we do not know what He is saying —
although we all agree that He said something ... that
sounds suspiciously clear.
We must, however, pay careful attention to these twelve
words, …. perhaps more now than at any
other time in Church history.
“When the Son of Man comes will He find
Faith on earth?”
These are twelve words, however, to which we must pay
careful attention, perhaps more now than at any other time
in Church history.
However reluctant we are to take Christ at His word — which
becomes increasingly inconvenient to us — we must recognize
that Jesus never spoke idly: His words, His teachings — and
yes, His Commandments — were always uttered to one
explicit end: the salvation of souls — attaining to Heaven
and everlasting happiness and to avoiding Hell and eternal
misery.
The Jewish religious authorities —
“the learned” of His own time — had scornfully
dismissed Christ’s warning that not so much as stone would
remain standing in the great Temple 1
... the very Temple within which, 70 years later, these
words were fulfilled when Rome laid waste in days what took
46 years to build.
We tend to view such alarming statements made by Jesus — and
there are many — with the same scorn and disdain today.
Indeed ... what has become of the “Faith of our Fathers?”
A mere fifty years ago we ourselves would have instinctively
replied “Of course He will find faith! There simply
must be some deeper, some obscure and less evident meaning
to this that we do not presently understand — and what He
appears to be saying, He is not really saying at all.
Surely the “learned” of our own day can deftly explain the
answer to this troubling question. In the end, they will
conclude, Jesus is really asking something entirely
different from what He appears to be asking and
that it has nothing to do with our very real defection from
the Faith.”
It is likely that many Jews of Jesus’ time — both the
learned and the unlearned — had replied in much the same
way. In fact, they did. 2
In other words, to us, our faith, the Faith of the Catholic
Church for two millennia, could no sooner disappear than ...
well, the stones of the great Temple 2000 years ago!
If, however, we take a careful inventory of our present and
undeniably dismal and increasingly scandalous situation in
the Church — especially as it has unfolded in the last five
decades — Jesus does not quite appear as ... “perplexing”
... as so many apparently make Him to be.
Candidly Ask yourself the following:
Has the Faith — the Catholic Faith — flourished in
the last 50 years, or has it withered?
Are vocations to the Priesthood and Religious life
growing or dwindling?
Are Catholics having more children or are they having
fewer children?
Are Missionary efforts, to the end of (dare we say
it?) “conversion” as mandated by Christ
2 encouraged as intrinsic to Catholicism
— or are they discouraged as impolite, obtrusive,
culturally imperialistic and inherently inimical to the
“Ecumenical spirit of Vatican II” — especially as
interpreted by Pope Francis for whom “proselytism is solemn
nonsense,” to use his own words, words that mock the
sacrifices of countless missionary saints through the 2000
years preceding Vatican II’s
“more
enlightened” understanding of the
Great Commission*?
Rather, we find that “conversion” to Christ and His Church
is actively discouraged — that especially under Pope
Francis it is no longer understood as a holy and
inherently necessary endeavor — instead, it is
disdained, even dismissed, as “socially and culturally
incorrect” — indeed, we find that promoting our
Catholic Faith — as Christ has commanded us to— has
been forbidden by Francis and his “progressive”
coterie of feckless and disaffected cardinals and bishops!
What pope, prior to Vatican II, could ever have envisioned
this?
Is our understanding of the Catholic Church, as an
absolutely unique institution indispensable to the ordinary
means of salvation, emphasized as urgently today (if it
is emphasized at all) as it was a hundred years ago? Fifty
years ago? Indeed, is the concept itself — of the
singularity and indispensability of the Holy Catholic Church
— still deemed an actual dogma and a viable concept
at all?
For all our insolence and equivocation, we know the answers,
and we are uncomfortable with them, for they fly in the face
of Christ and all that He taught — to say nothing of Sacred
Scripture, Holy Tradition, and the Sacred Deposit of the
Faith entrusted to the Catholic Church by God Himself.
Indeed, Christ’s question takes on a greater sense of
urgency still, for the sheep are scattered and confused as
never before. The papacy of Francis has been disastrous for
the Church. Why? Precisely because he has taken Vatican II
to its logical conclusion: the irrelevance of the
Church.
Ubi est Pastor?
Where is the Shepherd? Who is earnestly addressing
this spiritual malaise and religious decay due to the
indolence and dereliction of the vast majority of American
and European bishops who appear far more eager for secular
plaudits than the now quaint and discredited notion of “the
salvation of souls.” Pope Francis has effectively declared
this mandate defunct in favor of the rehabilitation of
bodies, societies, economies, and “the environment”. That
the passing material environment of man is infinitely
less important than the eternal abode of his soul,
often appears to elude Francis. Indeed, it appears to elude
most Catholics whose mantra increasingly coincides with the
world’s: Social activism! ... not interior
conversion away from this world ... and to Christ.
Shame! Shame on us! By our silence, our fear of being
disparaged by “other Catholics” for the sake of Christ, we
condone this travesty — are complicit in it ... even
promote it!
What will motivate us to recognize, and to redress,
this frightful and ultimately deadly state of affairs?
There are, after all, other contenders in this world for the
souls of men ... seen and unseen! As our own wick smolders,
others blaze! The burning Crescent of Islam, poised like a
scimitar, and every bit as deadly, glows and grows in the
east, and with it, not an ethnic, but a Religious
Cleansing to which the world remains indifferent — an
expunging of every vestige of Christianity in partibus
infidelium. And even Islam has its secular
collaborators: the European Union — once a continent raised
up from utter barbarism to a civilization formed and
ennobled by its Catholic heritage — will no longer tolerate
the inclusion of its indissoluble Christian heritage within
its Constitution. Not only does it thoroughly repudiate its
own Christian cultural heritage — it prohibits it —
even banishes it! This is nothing less than
self-loathing. And perhaps it ought to be.
Surely, then, in our effort to remedy this impending state
of dissolution, we will first turn to our bishops, since
they are, preeminently, the “Teachers and Guardians of the
Faith”. But more often than not — much more often than not —
in the well-appointed office at the end of the corridor we
do not find a shepherd of souls but a deeply sequestered,
occasionally avuncular, and predictably remote ...
“administrator.”
Relegating his prime responsibility as Teacher and Promoter
of the Faith ... to others, in the form of Lay committees
and subcommittees largely “chaired” by liberal Catholics
more concerned with social issues than the salvation of
souls, are we confident that the patrimony of our faith will
somehow percolate through this strata of already
contaminated soil and reach our children authentically and
intact? Is our fear mitigated ... or further exacerbated ...
by our bishops’ resolute lack of diligence in being
attentive to what Catholic colleges and theologians in their
own dioceses are really teaching — and who are teaching the
teachers ... who, in turn, are teaching our children?
Do you think that your bishop actually — that is to say,
cognitively — is aware of, or even concerned with — what the
teachers themselves are actually teaching?
Not in this diocese. Not in Boston. In fact, Cardinal Sean
Patrick O’Malley had routinely feted, praised, and held up
as exemplary, the clueless “Catechists” who churn out our
children to the Sacrament of Confirmation — with no clue
whatever of that in which they are being confirmed. By
comparison, even the dismal failure of our public schools in
Boston must be deemed a stunning success.
For most of us — especially in the Archdiocese of Boston,
but no less elsewhere — the answer is, as they say, a
“no-brainer:” it is a universally resounding no. Most
of us find, to our growing dismay and deepening cynicism,
that our bishops appear to have “more important,” more ...
“pressing” things to do ... than to communicate the Faith to
the faithful ... especially the children.
Really, we beg the question: if no one teaches the teachers
— who, then, teaches the children? If they are not brought
the faith by those to whom it has been entrusted — the
bishops, the episcopacy — who will bring it to them?
Will they — how can they — acquire the Faith ... if
no one brings it to them? Saint Paul is very clear about
this:
“How then shall they call on him,
in whom they have not believed? Or how shall they
believe him, of whom they have not heard? And how shall
they hear, without a preacher? And how shall they preach
unless they be sent ...?” (Romans 10.14-15)
Ask yourself candidly: do you know more ... or less ... of
your Catholic faith than your children? Very likely more —
although, in all honesty, it is probably little. You
politely assent to the now quaint Catholic notion that
“parents are the primary teachers of their children,” but
knowing little of your own Faith, you simply shell out
$175.00 per child and pan off this grave responsibility to
others of whom you know nothing, and who themselves largely
know nothing of the faith they presume to teach. You go
through the motions as careless of what your children are
taught in their 10 years of “Religious Education” as your
bishop is of what the teachers teach. 10 years later, and
$1500 poorer per child, you scratch your head and wonder why
Johnny still does not know God, and why Judy never goes to
Mass — and yet we have agreed that you know more than your
children ...
What, then, we must ask — with growing apprehension — will
your children teach their children ...?
What will they — who know even less than you —
teach those who know nothing?
Total Ignorance
The momentum, as we see, is inexorable — until it culminates
in total ignorance: every generation knows less of their
faith than the generation preceding it. It is, in the end,
the devolution from doctrine to legend, from legend to
fiction, and from fiction to myth.
That is not just a poor, but a stultifying and ultimately
deadly patrimony.
This default — at every level — in transmitting the
authentic Catholic faith intact ... leaves Jesus’
question very suddenly very real.
“Recently, a Gallup poll was taken on Catholic attitudes
toward Holy Communion. The poll showed serious confusion
among Catholics about one of the most basic beliefs of
the Church. Only 30 percent of those surveyed believe
they are actually receiving the Body and Blood, soul and
divinity of the Lord Jesus Christ under the appearance
of bread and wine.” 4
The problem is more than mathematical; as we have seen, it
is exponential. 70% of Catholics do not possess this most
fundamental, this most essential understanding of the core
article of genuine Catholic doctrine: that
“Unless you eat of the flesh of the
Son of Man, and drink His Blood, you have no life in you.”
Heavy stuff!
It is not just a matter of the greatest concern, but nothing
less than a matter of the gravest dereliction that most
Catholics do not realize — do not know — that the very
Mass itself is an abbreviation of “The Most Holy
Sacrifice of the Mass”, and that it is really a Sacrifice,
the actual re-enactment of Calvary before their very eyes!
This failure of understanding ... culminates in a failure in
Faith. It possesses, in significant ways, the remorseless
characteristics of mathematical certainties. Not
understanding, grasping — having never been taught — the
most elementary features of the faith, how can they be
understood to possess what they have not acquired, and how
can they transmit, pass on, what they do not possess? It is
inescapable.
Prognostication, of course, is for fools.
But the words of Christ are certainties that will come to
pass.
“Weep not for Me, but for your
children”, 5 Christ
told the sorrowing women on the road to Calvary.
Jesus’ question, then — “When the Son
of Man comes will He find faith on earth?”— is
not a “rhetorical question” at all; it is a question fraught
with enormous significance ... the frightful answer
to which appears to be unfolding before our very eyes ...
but that is if you take Christ at His word — and given
Jesus’ track record on things yet to come, we would do well
and wisely to give pause for more than thought.
Are you worried now ...? Not nearly enough.
And this is all the more frightening still.
Geoffrey K. Mondello
Editor
Boston Catholic Journal
Thursday January 16, 2025
Feast of Pope St. Marcellus
_____________________________________________
1 St. Matthew 24.1
2
St. John 2.19
3
St. Matthew 28:19
4
https://www.catholicculture.org/docs/doc_view.cfm?recnum=1340
5
St. Luke 23.28
*
“Going
therefore, teach ye all nations; baptizing them in
the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the
Holy Ghost. Teaching them to observe all things
whatsoever I have commanded you: and behold I am
with you all days, even to the consummation of the
world.”
(St. Matthew 28.19-20)
Concerning
the graphic:
“And
I saw, when he had opened the sixth seal, and behold
there was a great earthquake, and the sun became
black as sackcloth of hair: and the whole moon
became as blood: And the stars from heaven fell upon
the earth,”
(Apocalypse 6.12-13) and
“The
sun shall be turned into darkness, and the moon into
blood: before the great and dreadful day of the Lord
doth come.”
(Joel 2.31)
Printable PDF Version
Francis and the
Collapse
of the
Ecumenical Project
A Grim
Reflection on the Legacy of a Steward
Francis will die —
although we do not wish his death, nor the death of
any man — but it is … withal, the temporal end
of every man, pontiff, or layman, commoner or king.
Reflecting on this as Francis will soon celebrate
his 88th birthday in December of this
year, we are moved to observe
something very simple about his stewardship over the
House that the Lord has entrusted to him.
For
10 years now, Francis has attempted to “renovate” a
House that was not his, but only placed in his care
as a steward. The majestic facades the
incense-imbued silence within dimly lit through the
stained-glass light of a late afternoon, the soaring
spires that proclaimed the great Triumph of the
Cross abroad for all to see ... these
were not his to depredate: they belonged to
God … and to His simple servants who raised them to
His glory through the coppers they gave and through
the rough, calloused, hands that engraved every
niche in stone by dint of a devotion every bit as
indestructible as the tip of the chisel the
stone yielded to.
Some
of these Francis and his bishops simply tore down;
others they emptied by “consolidating” them
with other Catholic parishes who were equally
bleeding parishioners and who sold them to Muslims
whose adherents grew as exponentially as ours
diminished. Some were sold to Hispanic
Evangelical Protestants, others to developers who
gutted them and turned them into trendy
condominiums. And still others are left simply
abandoned and ruined.
This
was part of the “growth” spurred by the
innovations of Vatican II that was supposed to bring
the Church into the World but brought,
instead, the World into the Church.
And
the faithful fled, seeing little difference between
the two.
Renovation
A
far more destructive “renovation” is much closer to
the heart of Francis, however … than the mere
obliteration of what was symbolically holy in the
external presentation of the Church.
And
it concerns the very heart of the Church: its
Mass and its Liturgy.
These were the two greatest impediments to
the holy grail of Vatican II: Ecumenism.
And inextricably bound up with them were the
Sacred Deposit of Faith, and Sacred Tradition.
They had been quietly but indelibly preserved in
Latin despite nearly 70 years of experimentation in
the Vernacular Mass that somehow had promised,
but could not deliver upon, a supposed
“organic evolution” of worship into something
ecumenically acceptable to all men in
all religions.
Perhaps the New Order of the Mass, the
“Novus Ordo” constructed almost exclusively
by two men alone: the Freemason Anabile Bugnini
and Bishop Luca Brandolini could still lend
itself as the vehicle to “a universal worship of
God” under the auspices of Ecumenism: each
religion to its own god to be worshipped as the one,
true god … within Catholicism itself!
….. but not in Judaism, Islam,
Buddhism, or Hinduism, each of whom keep their
respective gods without conflating them with any
other god, especially the formerly Catholic
God. To use Francis’s dismissive term for
Traditional Catholics,“indietrists,” or
backward-ists, are much too caught up in trifles
like logic to enter emotionally into the “spirit”
of Ecumenism where, apparently, the Law of
Non-Contradiction is not admissible … and
contradictory affirmations are compulsory.
In
Francis’s New church, All are Welcome ... Except the
Children ...
Without question … and without surprise … the
New Order of Mass, the Novus Ordo Mass of
Paul VI has proven itself to be extremely versatile
and spontaneously creative, possessing
nothing of that loathsome “ridigity” so detested by
Francis in the “Old Latin Mass.”
We’ve all witnessed this spontaneity, this
tossing off of the shackles of customary ritual
in nearly every Mass; …. so much so, in fact, that
we never quite know what to expect at a Mass the
next town over if a Catholic Church still remains
there.
It
could be a “Charismatic Mass” that could compete
with, or even surpass in excess, any
uninhibited Protestant Revival Meeting. It could be
a “Healing Mass,” or a “Children’s Mass,” or even a
“Liturgical Dance Mass” (pardon me if I shudder). It
may not even be in your language.
So many Masses we now have! …. except
Latin Masses.
“All
are welcome!” in Francis’s new church; all except
Latin rite Catholics ... the unwelcome
step-children of Vatican II, the only children
not allowed to “walk in accompaniment”
with Francis & Friends; a “privilege” reserved to
“other” “kinds of” Catholics, non-Catholics,
and atheists alike.
Francis's own rigid insistence on the
Novus Ordo Mass to the exclusion of any
Mass preceding Vatican II is, in fact, completely
understandable in light of his determination to
fulfill the Ecumenical pledge of Vatican II: not
just the unification of all Christians in spite of
doctrinal, ecclesiological, and confessional
differences, but more ambitiously: the unification
of all believers of all religions and
no religion in some chaotic form of
transcendental reality … perceived only by Francis
and the few.
How
Ecumenism Collapsed in Upon Itself
This
Ecumenical super-reality is meant to encompass so
much, so broadly, and can only be
achieved at so great a logical cost, that the
Ecumenical project itself becomes meaningless.
Ecumenism as the endeavor to bring unity out of
divergence has only — and necessarily — resulted in
affirming the religious differences it
implicitly denied — an implicit denial now
become explicit under Francis! Under Francis as the
most vigorous prosecutor of Vatican II we find that
Ecumenism merely reiterates and affirms the
religious divisions that it sought,
not just to mitigate, but to abolish in the
beginning!
Ecumenism, we find, has collapsed in upon itself!
It has simply ended up restating the problem
… and then declared that the problem itself
was the solution! Everyone,
it turns out, ecumenically — and now “synodally” —
goes his own way to God in
precisely the religion into which he was born!
Or, as Francis succinctly stated recently, “All
religions are [equal] paths to [the same] God.”
It
is much like claiming to achieve an ultimate
synthesis that reconciles all contradictions, but,
oddly, cannot explain how, and so
becomes unintelligible … and therefore worthless.
All
religions, then, are good and acceptable … except
Catholicism. Somehow, by keeping to the way of its
fathers in the Faith from the beginning,
Catholicism alone — among all religions — is
in need of “atonement” before the World: the
Church must implore “forgiveness” from the
World; forgiveness for a host of fictional sins
from the “sin against synodality”, and the “sin
against creation,” to the post-Conciliar grievances
of being “patriarchal,” “oppressive,” “unjust to …
[insert your resentment here]” and engaged in
aggressive religious and social acculturation … as
well as being historically and intolerably logical
and unambiguous.
For
Francis to scornfully dismiss those who are not
persuaded that his ecumenical agendum is the
principal reason behind his growing impatience with
abolishing and outlawing the Latin Mass (although he
disingenuously — really, quite dishonestly —
states that it is to “preserve unity” in the Church)
is a failure in charity to acknowledge real and
legitimate issues among the faithful concerning
the very unity he pretends to seek … while actively
promoting discord within it.
For
Francis to claim that he is trying to preserve unity
through this autocratic move is both shamefully and
manifestly untruthful. That the Latin Mass, together
with the irreproachable theology upon which it has
been articulated, has been so thoroughly, so
forcefully, repudiated by Francis is an indication
of how desperate a measure he is willing to resort
to in order to implement, or better yet, to force,
an increasingly brittle ecumenical paradigm on
clergy and laity alike. Pieces of that ecumenical
puzzle that are not of Bergoglio's making either
will not fit, or refuse to fit, however much force
he applies to them.
A
Happy Failure
It
will be a happy failure that Francis could not, for
all his intrigue and ill-designs, bring to an end
what faithless princes and kings, heretics and
apostates through 20 centuries had been unable to
achieve: the destruction, and the utter removal from
living memory, of the inextinguishable sanctity of
the Latin Mass of all the Ages.
It
will be a sad epitaph for Francis in many ways, and
history will not look kindly upon his persecution of
the faithful in the very house given to them … and
entrusted to him for their safekeeping. It is all
the more sad — not that he failed to keep
them, or even that he refused to keep them —
but that he sought to drive them out. Seeking
to please men, he drove out the children.
It
is a tragedy of great depth. It is also one that
calls for deep, even the most profound prayer;
prayer that must extend to the hand that strikes, as
well as to the stricken.
Listening to Christ, let us remember not so much what has been
done to us, but rather what remains for us to
do. We
must pray for Francis. Christ Himself has commanded
it:
“Love your enemies: do good to them that
hate you: and pray for them that persecute
and calumniate you: That you may be the
children of your Father who is in heaven.”
(St. Mat. 5.44-45)
Geoffrey K. Mondello
Editor
Boston Catholic Journal
October 11, 2024
Feast of the Maternity of the Blessed Virgin Mary
Printable PDF Version
Comments? Write us:
editor@boston-catholic-journal.com
On The Imminent Passing of the
Catholic Church
From All Memory
(updated Sunday October 6, 2024)
The
despotic and heretical reign of Pope Francis will end.
It was a papacy unlike any other, for we found in the
Seat of Peter the erstwhile unimaginable ... a heretic.
Not a promoter of the Faith, but a destroyer of the
Faith. A man whose gods were many and whose
scruples were few; who seized the House of the Master
and pretended it was his own, throwing down the walls
that the martyrs built and bled upon; clearing the Altar
for strange new gods. He was ever a grievous wound in the side of the Church, and
like all healthy bodies, the Body of Christ, which is
the Church, developed a hard and ugly response to it.
As a scab that has
been pulled off a wound, leaving it painful and bleeding
once again ... but beginning to heal ... the ill-starred
papacy of Francis, once it has been peeled away from the
unblemished Body, will begin to allow the healing so
desperately needed in a deeply infected body.
But it is almost
equally certain that the return to a state of health will be painfully long. The Church will not
soon recover from the horrific damage inflicted upon it
by Francis. The foreign pathogens and deadly toxins that
he inserted deeply into the body will not go away at
once, or, indeed, anytime soon. His death is not likely
to result in warring factions between cardinals and
bishops in a stark theological divide separating
traditional from progressive prelates; those faithful to
a Church forged in a crucible of 2000 years of suffering
and sanctity … prior to Vatican II, and those who would
cast that crown of thorns and glory into the cesspool of
“modern man,” eager to make a new ecumenical god to
accommodate their new religion.
Continue reading
I Have
a Question for You ...
“Where do We Go From Here?”
When Pope Francis Abolishes the Latin
Mass
For the text version of this video, click
here
|
Please visit us at our new
channel
|
Comments? Write us:
editor@boston-catholic-journal.com
The Holy Catholic Faith
Where is it And Who is Keeping
it?
Has the
Post-Conciliar Church
Lost Custody of the Faith?
All indications are that is has.
The “Dark
Ages” — that disdainful term for the period in history following
the collapse of the Roman Empire in 476 A.D. until the 15th
century (a period correctly described as the Middle
Ages) is understood by the secular world to have
lasted roughly 1000 years, beginning in Florence, Italy.
Within the
post-Conciliar Catholic Church, however, it appears
that the term extends well beyond the 15th century;
indeed, some 500 years beyond it! According to contemporary
Catholic thought articulated within the past five papacies,
the “Dark Ages” really ended in 1965 at the conclusion
of the Second Vatican Council. All the doctrines and teachings
prior to that Council were only imperfectly, deficiently,
and insufficiently articulated or defectively understood.
The 1000
Years of Darkness
Only
the Second Vatican Council finally attained to enlightenment
in the divine economy, and after 1,965 years of suspension,
it alone has provided the final, sufficient, and correct
understanding of God and Church, man and nature. Prior to
that, according to post-Conciliar thought, Catholics had
essentially lived in darkness, specifically the darkness
of the “pre-Conciliar Dark Ages.” It may be said that where
the Rational Enlightenment “saved the world from religion,”
Vatican II saved the Church from Catholicism.
Continue reading
Martyrology for Today
Semen est sanguis Christianorum (The blood of Christians
is the seed of the Church) Tertullian, Apologeticum,
50
ROMAN MARTYROLOGY
Friday,
January 17th
in
the Year of Grace 2025
Time after Epiphany
This Day, the Seventeenth Day of January
In Thebais, St. Anthony, abbot
and spiritual guide of many monks. He was most celebrated
for his life and miracles, of which St. Athanasius has written
a detailed account. His sacred body was found by divine
revelation, during the reign of the emperor Justinian, and
brought to Alexandria, where it was buried in the church
of St. John the Baptist.
At Langres, in the time of Marcus Aurelius, the
saints Speusippus, Eleusippus, and
Meleusippus, born at one birth, who were crowned
with martyrdom, together with their grandmother
Leonilla.
At Rome, the finding of the holy martyrs
Diodorus, priest, Marian, deacon, and their companions.
Whilst they were commemorating the birthdays of the martyrs
in a sand-pit, the entrance was closed by the persecutors,
and the vault over them broken down, and they thus obtained
the palm of martyrdom in the reign of Pope St. Stephen.
At Bourges, the demise of St. Sulpicius,
surnamed Pius, whose life and precious death are
adorned with glorious miracles.
At Rome, in the monastery of St. Andrew, the
blessed monks Anthony, Merulus, and
John, of whom Pope St. Gregory speaks in his writings.
And elsewhere in divers places, many other holy martyrs,
confessors, and holy virgins.
Omnes sancti Mártyres,
oráte pro nobis. (“All
ye Holy Martyrs, pray for us,” from the Litaniae Sanctorum, the Litany
of the Saints)
Response: Thanks be to God.
|
Roman Martyrology by Month
Why the Martyrs Matter
Each day we bring you a calendar,
a list really, of the holy Martyrs who had suffered and died
for Christ, for His Bride the Church, and for our holy Catholic
Faith; men and women for whom — and well they knew — their
Profession of Faith would cost them their lives.
They could have repudiated all three (Christ, Church, and Catholic
Faith) and kept their lives for a short time longer (even the
lapsi * only postponed their death — and
at so great a cost!)
What would motivate men, women, even children and entire families
to willingly undergo the most evil and painfully devised tortures;
to suffer death rather than denial?
Why did they not renounce their Catholic Faith when the first
flame licked at their feet, after the first eye was plucked
out, or after they were “baptized” in mockery by boiling water
or molten lead poured over their heads? Why did they not flee
to offer incense to the pagan gods since such a ritual concession
would be merely perfunctory, having been done, after all, under
duress, exacted by the compulsion of the state? What is a little
burned incense and a few words uttered without conviction, compared
to your own life and the lives of those you love? Surely God
knows that you are merely placating the state with empty gestures
…
Did they love their wives, husbands, children — their mothers,
fathers and friends less than we do? Did they value their own
lives less? Were they less sensitive to pain than we are? In
a word, what did they possess that we do not?
Nothing. They possessed what we ourselves are given in the Sacrament
of Confirmation — but cleaved to it in far greater measure than
we do: Faith and faithfulness; fortitude and valor, uncompromising
belief in the invincible reality of God, of life eternal in
Him for the faithful, of damnation everlasting apart from Him
for the unfaithful; of the ephemerality of this passing world
and all within it, and lives lived in total accord with that
adamant belief.
We are the Martyrs to come! What made them so will make us
so. What they suffered we will suffer. What they died for, we
will die for. If only we will! For most us, life will be
a bloodless martyrdom, a suffering for Christ, for the sake
of Christ, for the sake of the Church in a thousand ways outside
the arena. The road to Heaven is lined on both sides with Crosses,
and upon the Crosses people, people who suffered unknown to
the world, but known to God. Catholics living in partibus
infidelium, under the scourge of Islam. Loveless marriages.
Injustices on all sides. Poverty. Illness. Old age. Dependency.
They are the cruciform! Those whose lives became Crosses because
they would not flee God, the Church, the call to, the
demand for, holiness in the most ordinary things of life made
extraordinary through the grace of God. The Martyrology we celebrate
each day is just a vignette, a small, immeasurably small, sampling
of the martyrdom that has been the lives of countless men and
women whom Christ and the Angels know, but whom the world does
not know.
“Exemplum enim dedi vobis”, Christ
said to His Apostles: “I have given you an example.” And His
Martyrs give one to us — and that is why the Martyrs matter.
-
A Martyr is one who suffers
tortures and a violent death for the sake of Christ
and the Catholic Faith.
-
A Confessor is one who
confesses Christ publicly in times of persecution and who
suffers torture, or severe punishment by secular authorities
as a consequence. It is a title given only given
to those who suffered for the Faith —
but was not killed for it — and
who had persevered in the Faith until the end.
Geoffrey K. Mondello
Editor
editor@boston-catholic-journal.com
Boston Catholic Journal
Note: We suggest that you explore
our newly edited and revised
“De
SS. Martyrum Cruciatibus — The Torments and Tortures of the
Christian Martyrs”
for an in-depth historical account of the sufferings of the
Martyrs.
*
Those early Christians who renounced their Catholic Faith
in times of persecution. When confronted with the prospect
of torture and death if they held fast to their faith in
Christ, they denied Him and their Faith through an act of
sacrificing (often incense) to the pagan Roman gods and
in so doing kept their lives and/or their freedom and property.
CONSECRATION OF THE 2024 ELECTION TO THE
BLESSED VIRGIN MARY
Mary
Immaculate, living tabernacle of the
Divinity, where the eternal Wisdom lies
hidden to be adored and served by angels and
men, Queen of heaven and of earth, beneath
whose sway are subject all things that are
lower than God, Patroness of the United
States of America, sorrowful and mindful of
our own sinfulness and the sins of our
nation, we come to thee, our refuge and
hope. Knowing that our country cannot be
saved by our own works and mindful of how
much our nation has departed from the ways
of thy Son, we humbly ask that thou wouldst
turn thine eyes upon our country to bring
about its conversion. We consecrate to thee
the integrity of the upcoming election and
its outcome, so that what is spiritually and
morally best for the citizens of our country
may be accomplished, and that all of those
who are elected would govern according to
the spiritual and moral principles which
will bring our nation into conformity with
the teachings of thy Son. Give grace to the
citizens of this land so that they will
choose leaders according to the Sacred Heart
of thy Son, that His glory may be made
manifest, lest we be given the leaders we
deserve. Trusting in the providential care
of God the Father and thy maternal care, we
have perfect confidence that thou wilst take
care of us and will not leave us forsaken.
O Mary Immaculate, pray
for us. Amen
|
This
Consecration will remain on the Boston Catholic Journal
until midnight November 5th, 2024
We urge our readers to pray it every day until this
crucial election is decided.
(prayer composed by Father Chad Ripperger)
Totally Faithful to
the Sacred Deposit of Faith entrusted
to the Holy See in Rome
“Scio
opera tua ... quia modicum habes virtutem, et servasti
verbum Meum, nec non negasti Nomen Meum”
“I
know your works ... that you have but little power,
and yet you have kept My word, and have not denied
My Name.”
(Apocalypse 3.8)
Copyright © 2004 - 2025 Boston Catholic
Journal. All rights reserved. Unless otherwise stated,
permission is granted by the Boston Catholic Journal
for the copying and distribution of the articles
and audio files under the following conditions:
No additions, deletions, or changes are to be made
to the text or audio files in any way, and the copies
may not be sold for a profit. In the reproduction,
in any format of any image, graphic, text, or audio
file, attribution must be given to the Boston Catholic
Journal.
|
|