Suggested Reading:



Learn your Faith through this free series of  video presentations by
Dominican Friars

St. Thomas Institute

St. Thomas Institute



P
ope Saint Pius V

Pope Saint Pius V pray for Holy Mother Church, for Heresies abound

Pray for Holy Mother Church,
for heresies abound


Boston Catholic Journal

Write us:

editor@boston-catholic-journal.com

Boston Catholic Journal

HOME


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Boston Catholic Journal - Critical Catholic Commentary in the Twilight of Reason

 

 

Boston Catholic Journal

Martyrology for Today


CRITICAL CATHOLIC COMMENTARY

in the Twilight of Reason


 

 

Mary, Conceived without Sin, Pray for us who have Recourse to Thee

Mary, Conceived without Sin,

pray for us who have recourse to Thee

 


 

 

 

 

Mao Zedong, Adolf Hitler, Joseph Stalin

Are We all Children of God
... no matter what?

 

While in Singapore, Indonesia, Francis made the following statement:

All religions are a path to God. “They are like different languages in order to arrive at God, but God is God for all and Since God is God for all, then we are all children of God. There’s only one God, and each of us has a language to arrive at God. Some are Sikh, Muslim, Hindu, Christian, and they are different paths to God.1

     Notice that Francis doesn’t say, “different gods,” but rather, speaks in the singular: God (one God) who he very clearly identifies as the same God worshipped differently in each respective religion. Apart from recognizing the historical significance of this openly heretical statement, it is also that for Francis to speak very clearly and unambiguously about virtually anything is extremely rare and therefore noteworthy.

     I will not attempt to parse the logical contradictions glaringly inherent in such a statement. I will leave logic aside and let the different religions, or Francis’s “different paths to God,” decide the matter for us among themselves. What do you say?

     Muslims will strongly, and rightly, disagree with the statement that the Holy Trinity, that is to say, the Christian God, and Allah, are the same. They are not! The Muslim will tell you in no uncertain terms — even vehemently — that Francis is a liar! The Muslim Imam knows this … but the Catholic Pope, together with his coterie of Vatican II Ecumenists, does not.

     I wonder if he is prepared to correct his Muslim “brothers” as he walks the “Synodal Way of Accompaniment” with them on the road to the Kaaba in Mecca … where only Muslims are allowed to enter.

So … Francis is very clear about both: who we are, and who God is:

  • “we are all children of God

  •  and there is only one God … Sikh, Muslim, Hindu, Christian …  it matters not

  • all are different … but the same — and the only ones who do not realize this are the gods themselves and the practitioners of each religion ...

  • nevertheless ... because the distinction between them is ultimately illusory in the “Ecumenical” purview, all differences and contradictions are, in some incomprehensible manner, fantastically reconciled such that, despite all doctrines, teachings, dogmas, creeds, beliefs, rituals, and  appearances, they each and equally constitute certain paths to the one same God.

     Oh, yes ... and even if my God calls your god an idol and a demon  —  which our God does:

“Declare his glory among the nations ... he is terrible to all the gods,  because all the gods of the nations are demons, but the Lord made the heavens.”  (Psalm 96.3–5)

     God, then, is whatever and whomever we wish him to be — and every path ... however divergent from, and contradictory to, every other path, is a certain way to a god of our choosing who, despite every conflicting ascription, every incompatible predication — strangely enough turns out to be our own god ... also! And we never knew it. This is not just theological, but inescapably logical nonsense.

     But does it sound strangely familiar? It should:

     On June 14, 2017 Francis made the following statement:

“Is it possible God has some children He does not love?
 No! We are all God’s beloved children.”  2

     In light of his vitriolic denunciation of Catholic Tradition in favor of Ecumenism — an altogether heretical concept prior to Vatican II — and one which Francis resolutely promotes at the cost of authentic Catholicism, it is not surprising in the least that he asks this question — as though the question itself is altogether rhetorical ... already answered in its being asked: “Of course, not!”

     And what is more troubling still … is that this question is … in fact … received by most post-Conciliar Catholics as merely rhetorical as well! … that is to say, as though the answer is already understood in the asking — and that answer, of course, is a resounding: “yes — of course! After all, everyone goes to Heaven. The pope himself routinely tells us so!” — despite what Christ teaches us about the “hard and narrow” way to Heaven:

“Enter in at the narrow gate: for wide is the gate, and broad is the way that leads to destruction, and many there are who go that way. How narrow is the gate, and strait is the way that leads to life: and few there are that find it! Beware of false prophets, who come to you in the clothing of sheep, but inwardly they are ravening wolves.” (St. Mat. 7.15-23)

     Oh, yes, concerning the “false prophets, who come to you in the clothing of sheep, but inwardly they are ravening wolves,” may we suggest that you consider five:

1.  John XXIII
2.  Paul VI
3. John Paul I
4. John Paul II
3. and the APEX WOLF: Francis

     That is to say, in short, every pontiff who instigated, promoted, or was complicit in what we have come to know as Vatican II which decimated the Church and Religious Orders, contemned and vitiated Her teachings, effectively abrogated Her Sacred Tradition, laid siege to Her Sacred Deposit of Faith, outlawed her language (Latin), abolished the Mass of the Ages (Tridentine), defiled the Sanctuary with women “Ministers” of Communion (note that they are no longer designated “Extraordinary-ministers”), secularized the Liturgy, and homosexualized Her priests, bishops, and cardinals — so this includes every pope that you may have admired since 1958).

     Consider the following: Catholic Mass attendance was 75+% in 1955 and plunged to 20-30% in 2017.  In 1970, 55 % of American Catholics went to Mass every Sunday, and in 2019 that figure dwindled to 20%. “The Center for Church Management at Villanova University projects an attendance rate in the neighborhood of 12 percent by next year or the year after.” 3 “Altar girls” vastly outnumber “Altar-Boys” and both are “socially/correctly” called “Altar Servers” — thereby abolishing any distinction in gender in deference to the rise of “Woman Church” and the poison of Feminism.

     All this — all of it — is the fruit of Vatican II ... every effeminate and recreant priest, bishop, and cardinal; the feminization and homosexualization of nearly every aspect of the Catholic Church — has left it in ruins, pallid and prostate before the World which it loves more than God. There are good and faithful traditional priests — who are persecuted mercilessly by their bishops, cardinals ... and even the pope. Good men. Manly men. Priests of Almighty God! Men who do not lisp — and who would die before kissing the Muslim Quran! Not so Francis. Not so!

     In our pursuit of Truth — Who is, and Which is, nothing less than Jesus Christ Himself — you must soberly ask yourself: does Vatican II really sound like a success story to you? If yes, then I suggest that you go to the essay “Vatican II: The Model of the Failed Corporation” .

     We might take the earlier citation from Holy Scripture (St. Mat.7.15-23) as a prologue merely to the many disagreements between Francis and Jesus Christ in this matter and many, many others. Consider the following:

Jesus Christ:

  • “You do the works of your father. Why do you not know my speech. Because you cannot hear my word. You are of your father the devil, and the desires of your father you will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and he stood not in the truth because truth is not in him. He is a liar and the father of lies.” (St. John 8.41-44)

  •  “He that commits sin is of the devil: for the devil sinned from the beginning. In this the children of God are manifest, and the children of the devil: Whosoever is not just, is not of God, nor he that loves not his brother.” (1 John3.8-10)

  • “Not everyone that says to me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the Kingdom of Heaven: but he that doeth the will of My Father who is in Heaven, he shall enter into the kingdom of heaven. Many will say to me in that day: Lord, Lord, have we not done many miracles in Thy name? And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from Me, you that work iniquity.” (St. Mat.7.21-23)

     Clearly, then, there are children whose Father, according to Christ, is God — that is to say, the children of God; and there are children whose Father is the devil — which is to say, children of the devil!

     And yet …according to Francis, “We are all God’s beloved children”

Whom do we Believe?

     The point is simply this: whom shall we believe? The Master or the servant? Truth Himself — Who stood before Pontius Pilate on the day He was crucified while Pilate pedantically asked, “What is Truth?” ... even as Truth bled in his presence — or His feckless vicar who either distorts … or contradicts the truth entrusted to him?

     In other words, are we to believe Truth Himself …. or His recreant proxy who speaks in open contradiction to the Truth?

In 1521 Luther wrote to Philip Melanchthon (Luther’s closest collaborator in heresy):

“Love God and sin boldly ... No sin can separate us from Him, even if we were to kill or commit adultery thousands of times each day.” 7 

The correspondence between Francis’s, “Is it possible that God has some children He does not love? No! We are all God’s beloved children.” and Martin Luther’s “No sin can separate us from Him, even if we were to kill or commit adultery thousands of times each day.” is unmistakable. This is the most manifest and deadly fruit of the heresy called Ecumenism.

     Therefore, despite all that Christ taught us, no matter what we do, say, promote, believe, or not believe, is irrelevant. No sin is so heinous, no act so horrendous, no belief so criminal, no unbelief so absolute, that it can disqualify us from going to Heaven with all the other ... “Saints” ... like Hitler, Josef Mengele, Stalin, Hideki Tojo, Nero, Mao Zedong, Genghis Khan, Caligula, and Diocletian, to name a few. For Francis, these men — despite the magnitude of their malevolence and the enormity of their atrocities ... are nevertheless “God’s beloved children.”

     Who can so much as conceptualize God uttering something like,

These are my beloved children: Adolf  and his brothers Diocletian, Mao, Josef and Stalin; Tojo, Nero, Genghis, and Caligula.”?

     Who, indeed, is their father?  Are they the “beloved children of God” whom Francis would have us believe — or are they those of whom Christ spoke: “You are of your father the devil.”

     They cannot be both.

     Either Christ is a deceiver — or Francis is.

     However, being God with the Father and the Holy Ghost, Christ can neither deceive nor be deceived.6

     Francis can, will, and does.

     “Such a harsh, even cruel statement!” you will reproach me.

     Less harsh, I will respond, and far less frightening than the words of Christ at the Last Judgment:

“And when the Son of Man shall come … He shall separate them one from another, as the shepherd separate the sheep from the goats: He shall set the sheep on His right hand, but the goats on His left. Then … He shall say to them also that shall be on His left hand: depart from Me, you cursed, into everlasting fire which was prepared for the devil and his angels.” 8

     The god of Francis, it turns out, is not the God of Sacred Scripture. He fabricates his god to assuage the guilt and fear of men — the better to accord with the World, the Flesh, and primeval things of darkness that have no place in the Light ...

Let us be Clear:    

     At this point, whether or not the Seat of Saint Peter is vacant, is quite beside the point:

That it is occupied by a heretic, a polytheist, and a madman, is by now very clear to anyone not on a career path in Rome.

     Some popes have been Saints. Some have been scoundrels. Francis, regrettably, is certainly and most notoriously among the latter — and we will not, cannot, accept his repudiation of Jesus Christ Himself in Sacred Scripture together with the perennial teachings of the Holy Catholic Church and the many heretical credenda foisted on the Church by that most unfortunate event called Vatican II; that is to say, Francis’s chimerical understanding of himself — as the paradigm of Conciliar progressivism — and, lately, polytheism, in not pantheism — and also as the law-giver preeminent, the law-maker who tolerates no dissentindeed, who punishes it ruthlessly — does not coincide with the 2000-year-old understanding of the Petrine Office in the Economy of Salvation. Francis is a vicar only. Not the Master.

     Does a mere Vicar dare correct his Lord or amend His mandates?  Of course not! Therefore does Christ say:

    “Amen, amen I say to you: The servant is not greater than his Lord; neither is the Apostle greater than He that sent him.” (St. John 14.16)

     Must we therefore follow his teachings? We will let Pope Innocent III, arguably the most effective pope ever, answer this:

“It is necessary to obey a pope in all things as long as he does not go against the universal customs of the Church, but should he go against the universal customs of the Church he need not be followed.” 9  

     Francis, however, has done something more sinister still — something that no other pope preceding him, however corrupt, had done:  He made the Catholic Church unrecognizable.

 

Geoffrey K. Mondello
Editor
Boston Catholic Journal

   Printable PDF Version

Comments? Write us:  editor@boston-catholic-journal.com

_______________________________________________

1 https://cruxnow.com/2024-pope-in-timor-leste/2024/09/pope-in-multi-faith-singapore-says-all-religions-are-a-path-to-god
2 vatican.va/content/francesco/en/audiences/2017/documents/papafrancesco_20170614/we-dont-earn-gods-love-its-freely-given-pope-francis-says 
3 https://www.thecatholicthing.org/2021/04/17/the-american-church-going-going/           

St. John 14.24 — St. Mat.17.17-19 — St. John3.18 — St. John8.41-44 — 1 St. John 3.8-10.          
St. John 14.6 “I am the way, and the truth, and the life. No man comes to the Father, but by Me.”     
6
 St. John 18:38Pilate saith to Him: What is truth?   
7 https://www.thegospelcoalition.org/article/did-luther-really-tell-us-to-love-god-and-sin-boldly/                     
8  St. Mat 25.31-33 & 25.41
9 https://www.newadvent.org/cathen/08013a.htm        

 

 

 


___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

 
 
 
 
 

Three Pious Practices
for Every Devout Catholic

Mea culpa, mea culpa, mea maxima culpa ...

Gloria, Tea and Bee:


Recovering the Disreputable



     There are three pious practices that we no longer encounter and that had been not just customary, but instinctive to Catholics — up to 40 or so years ago when the notion of piety fell into disrepute, together with many of the customs long cherished — and practiced — by Catholics, not for years, but for centuries. They are simple things really, that we seldom see because ... well, they are rarely done and yet of themselves, speak volumes of our loss (perhaps a calculated deprivation, actually) of the sacred.

Let me give you both the long and the short of it. Here is the short:

  • We no longer bow our heads at the Sacred Name of Jesus (see Philippians 2.5-11)

  • We no longer make the Sign of the Cross over our hearts or foreheads when we pass by a Catholic Church where Christ dwells, really and truly, in the Blessed Sacrament.

  • We no longer make reparation whenever we hear the Sacred Name of Jesus uttered blasphemously.

     We have lost collective memory of things instinctually Catholic. Much of it has been superannuated by “policy” or simply jettisoned in what became a totally unilateral effort at ecumenism in which the Church embraced, en masse, much historically alien to it — with absolutely no other denomination embracing anything remotely “Catholic” in return. The Church surrendered much unique to its identity. The other “communions” wisely surrendered nothing. This is not to say that ecumenism has failed. It has only failed for Catholics — the only ones who have been resolute in failing to recognize the obvious.

     Now the long version, a vignette really, that captures much of what once was — not long ago — is no more, and ought to be: (the Boston Catholic Journal wishes to express its gratitude to P.G. of San Francisco, formerly of Massachusetts, for the following contribution)

A flood of memories came rushing in upon me one day recently at Mass.

I noticed an impeccably dressed elderly woman with stark white hair nodding — not just nodding, but nodding at what I began to realize were predictable times. To be sure, I continued to observe this almost imperceptible movement of her head downward until I became aware that it occurred precisely each time the priest uttered the Name, “Jesus.” It did not occur when the priest uttered “Christ” — except when it was preceded by “Jesus.”

I looked around the congregation and saw to my surprise that this gentle gesture was accompanied by other nods — mostly among what one “Minister of Music” derisively described to me as the “Grayheads.” I even observed it, much to my surprise, in one young man. Out of a congregation of perhaps 300, I noticed this almost imperceptible but curious behavior in perhaps five or six parishioners. And always — always and only — at the Sacred Name of Jesus.

Memories returned. Memories of my father. A tall man (to me as a child, anyway) with a gentle voice; strong, in the quiet way that only gentleness can be remarkably strong, he walked beside me, straight and assured, but not arrogant. Holding my hand, we walked the several blocks to Church with my younger brother alternately walking and being carried effortlessly in the strong arms of my father. It was Sunday morning 1957. Upon entering Church (Saint Clement’s), he removed his hat and made sure we blessed ourselves properly. In those days matrons wore fur stoles that still had the eyes of the poor Minks still in them, which endlessly fascinated my brother, and frightened me. Dad had to prevent Mikey from poking at them during Mass.

It was here that I first remembered Dad nodding his head, too. I did not know why ... but he did, and so did everyone else. I remember asking him if his tie was too tight. He put his fingers to his lips and pointed in the direction of the Altar. As time went by I began to understand that one simply nods ones head whenever the name of Jesus was uttered. Catholics just did that. The priest did it. Dad did it. Even Mikey did it! And so did Tommy Mason, the freshest kid on the block! Soon it became second nature, in Church and out of it. I remember my father gently scolding me once when I deliberately said the “Holy Name” several times in a row to make the boys around me nod their heads! I even did it twice to Aunt Vickie!

But I also noticed two other peculiar things about Dad (and, in fact, a lot of other Catholics back then). Whenever we walked in front of a Church — even on the other side of the street — Dad would make a tiny Sign of the Cross over his heart in a hidden kind of way, and quietly utter :

“Gloria (presumably Aunt Gloria), Tea and Bee, Dom and knee”.

I thought it a cute riddle that rhymed, although I never had an Uncle Dom. Later Dad unraveled the mystery to me one day when I finally asked him who “Dom” was. I distinctly remember that it was winter, for Dad crouched down beside me in the snow, threw his muffler around our faces to keep out the snow and wind, and told me, “It is Latin, son. “Gloria tibi, Domine”, which means, “Glory to You, Lord Jesus.” Yup, even as he spoke he nodded his head when he said “Jesus” — and so did I. I was learning. “Whenever you pass in front of a Catholic Church you always say that, son, and make the Sign of the Cross over your heart.” But Mom does it over her forehead, I protested. “Well, Mamma is right, too”, he said. “The important thing is that you always do it, because Jesus is inside the Church.”

Walking, driving, on the bus — wherever — Dad did it and I felt it was like a little secret between us, and, of course, Jesus (yes, I just now bowed my head).

There was one other thing that Dad did that stayed with me all my life. Whenever he spoke with someone who was either angry or just crude and said something like, “Jesus Christ! I told him he was a crook!” or, “Jesus, was I angry!”, I noticed that Dad very unobtrusively did two things! First, of course, he slightly bowed his head. Then he would usually cross his arms and underneath them secretly make a small, totally unnoticeable movement with his thumb, pressing it against his heart.

It took a long time for me to catch on to that one. Again, it was something he did so naturally and quietly that it almost escaped me. “Dad,” I later asked, after he had a very animated conversation with one of my uncles, “what do you do with your thumb when people are angry, like Uncle Mario was a few minutes ago? And why?” This really escaped me — but stayed with me all my life as perhaps no other gesture he taught me.

He paused a moment, as though trying to look for simple words to explain it.

“What,” he asked me, is the Third Commandment?” I told him,
“Thou shalt not take the name of the Lord thy God in vain.”, proud that I remembered it quickly (back then we had to memorize them and Nuns taught us our Catechism — and boy, you had better remember!)

“Well,” Dad continued, “Uncle Mario just used the Lord’s Name in vain. Instead of just letting it pass as blasphemy (I did not know what “blasphemy” exactly was at the time, but knew it was not good) against God, I just “finished” the sentence for him, adding, “Have mercy on us” and striking my heart as we do at Mass. That way, it brings something good out of a sin — I make it an opportunity to ask God’s mercy both for Uncle Mario and for myself.”

I began to understand what kind of man my father really was — and what kind of man I should try to be, too. So often it is the little things a person does — especially when they dont know that they are being observed — that leave the most lasting impressions.

Dad would not recognize most Catholics today. Neither, I think, would Saint Paul. What was second nature to them seems to have disappeared altogether — except for a few of those beautiful elderly women or old men at Mass.”

P.G.
San Francisco, CA


     Sad to say, not only do the laity no longer exercise these pious and beautiful practices — but neither do our priests or bishops. They use what Catholics once called the “Sacred Name” with no reverence, attaching to it a significance apparently no greater than any other name that passes from their lips. But it was not always so. For many, many centuries it was not so. But piety has become so … disreputable in our time. It is a term of disdain, a concept fraught with an intolerable “otherworldliness” that no longer has a place in our time, and in our world.

     What P.G., I think, was alluding to when he wrote that Saint Paul would probably not recognize most Catholic today, is this:

Christ Jesus, Who being in the form of God, thought it not robbery to be equal with God: But emptied himself, taking the form of a servant, being made in the likeness of men, and in habit found as a man. He humbled himself, becoming obedient unto death, even to the death of the cross. For which cause God also hath exalted him, and hath given him a name which is above all names: That at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, of those that are in heaven, on earth, and under the earth. And that every tongue should confess that the Lord Jesus Christ is in the glory of God the Father.” (Saint Paul’s Epistle to the Philippians 2.5-11)

The very Angels in Heaven bow at the name of Jesus ... and even the demons in Hell.
      But
we are somehow more enlightened than that …somehow superior to both — such that what is binding upon those in Heaven and Hell itself, is not binding upon us
!

     How vastly cultured, how erudite we now are, unlike those backward generations who filled the Church (and the Calendar of Saints) before Vatican II; you know, the indietrists” (the “backwardists as Francis had derisively called them) before Vatican II stamped out most things distinctly Catholic as impediments to the new evangel of Ecumenism.”

     How perfectly infused with Sanctifying Grace we have become — unlike our forebears just two generations past! How learned! How wise! How discerning! We thank God that we are not like them! (St. Luke 18.11)
     What a quantum leap! But I think not of grace — at least for us who have been made “a little less than the Angels” (Heb. 2.7) who bow in Heaven at the Sacred Name
          us, who have made ourselves less subject to God than even the demons!

     Think about it — and perhaps make a very ancient effort at what is “disreputable” to the world and more in keeping with your beautiful Catholic identity of 2000 years past — and what gives glory to God ... and not man.
 


Geoffrey K. Mondello
Editor
Boston Catholic Journal

   Printable PDF Version


Comments? Write us: 
editor@boston-catholic-journal.com

 

 

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

 
 
 

The Most Urgent Question of Our Time:

When the Son of Man Comes, will He Find Faith on Earth? 

(St. Luke 18.8)

 

     No more stunning, no more frightening, and perhaps no more ominously portentous words are spoken in all the Gospels, in fact, in the entire New Testament — perhaps even in the entirety of Sacred Scripture itself; words that have become increasingly fraught with significance with every passing year of the most unfortunate papacy of Francis — a papacy not just  likely … but I believe with certainty … will be understood not simply as among the worst … but the worst … the most destructive to the Faith and to the Church in the annals of 2000 years of Church history.

     Indeed, with every generation following that devastating Second Vatican Council — that scorched earth assault on Tradition and historical Catholicism — the question increasingly verges on an implied and obvious answer.

     Indeed, we must wonder if the question that Christ poses … “When the Son of Man comes will He find Faith on earth?” … is, in fact, spoken of this generation, or of one soon — very soon, to come.
 
     As with so many of Christ’s teachings, this troubling question is too often and too deftly explained away — especially by the overwhelming number of the liberal theologians and bishops who have proliferated and multiplied since 1962 — which is to say, by “the learned and the wise”. If we heed them, it would appear that either Christ does not know what He is saying, or we do not know what He is saying — although we all agree that He said something ... that sounds suspiciously clear.
 
     We must, however, pay careful attention to these twelve words, …. perhaps more now than at any
other time in Church history.



“When the Son of Man comes will He find Faith on earth?”

     These are twelve words, however, to which we must pay careful attention, perhaps more now than at any other time in Church history.

     However reluctant we are to take Christ at His word — which becomes increasingly inconvenient to us — we must recognize that Jesus never spoke idly: His words, His teachings — and yes, His Commandments — were always uttered to one explicit end: the salvation of souls — attaining to Heaven and everlasting happiness and to avoiding Hell and eternal misery.

     The Jewish religious authorities — “the learned” of His own time — had scornfully dismissed Christ’s warning that not so much as stone would remain standing in the great Temple 1 ... the very Temple within which, 70 years later, these words were fulfilled when Rome laid waste in days what took 46 years to build.

     We tend to view such alarming statements made by Jesus — and there are many — with the same scorn and disdain today.
     Indeed ... what has become of the “Faith of our Fathers?”

     A mere fifty years ago we ourselves would have instinctively replied “Of course He will find faith! There simply must be some deeper, some obscure and less evident meaning to this that we do not presently understand — and what He appears to be saying, He is not really saying at all. Surely the “learned” of our own day can deftly explain the answer to this troubling question. In the end, they will conclude, Jesus is really asking something entirely different from what He appears to be asking and that it has nothing to do with our very real defection from the Faith.”

     It is likely that many Jews of Jesus’ time — both the learned and the unlearned — had replied in much the same way. In fact, they did. 
     In other words, to us, our faith, the Faith of the Catholic Church for two millennia, could no sooner disappear than ... well, the stones of the great Temple 2000 years ago!
     If, however, we take a careful inventory of our present and undeniably dismal and increasingly scandalous situation in the Church — especially as it has unfolded in the last five decades — Jesus does not quite appear as ... “perplexing” ... as so many apparently make Him to be.


Candidly Ask yourself the following:

     Has the Faith — the Catholic Faith — flourished in the last 50 years, or has it withered?

     Are vocations to the Priesthood and Religious life growing or dwindling?

     Are Catholics having more children or are they having fewer children?

     Are Missionary efforts, to the end of (dare we say it?) “conversion” as mandated by Christ encouraged as intrinsic to Catholicism — or are they discouraged as impolite, obtrusive, culturally imperialistic and inherently inimical to the “Ecumenical spirit of Vatican II” — especially as interpreted by Pope Francis for whom “proselytism is solemn nonsense,” to use his own words, words that mock the sacrifices of countless missionary saints through the 2000 years preceding Vatican II more enlightened” understanding  of the Great Commission*?

     Rather, we find that “conversion” to Christ and His Church is actively discouraged — that especially under Pope Francis it is no longer understood as a holy and inherently necessary endeavor — instead, it is disdained, even dismissed, as “socially and culturally incorrect” — indeed, we find that promoting our Catholic Faith — as Christ has commanded us to— has been  forbidden by Francis and his “progressive” coterie of feckless and disaffected cardinals and bishops! What pope, prior to Vatican II, could ever have envisioned this?

     Is our understanding of the Catholic Church, as an absolutely unique institution indispensable to the ordinary means of salvation, emphasized as urgently today (if it is emphasized at all) as it was a hundred years ago? Fifty years ago? Indeed, is the concept itself — of the singularity and indispensability of the Holy Catholic Church — still deemed an actual dogma and a viable concept at all?

     For all our insolence and equivocation, we know the answers, and we are uncomfortable with them, for they fly in the face of Christ and all that He taught — to say nothing of Sacred Scripture, Holy Tradition, and the Sacred Deposit of the Faith entrusted to the Catholic Church by God Himself.

     Indeed, Christ’s question takes on a greater sense of urgency still, for the sheep are scattered and confused as never before. The papacy of Francis has been disastrous for the Church. Why? Precisely because he has taken Vatican II to its logical conclusion: the irrelevance of the Church.

Ubi est Pastor?

     Where is the Shepherd? Who is earnestly addressing this spiritual malaise and religious decay due to the indolence and dereliction of the vast majority of American and European bishops who appear far more eager for secular plaudits than the now quaint and discredited notion of “the salvation of souls.” Pope Francis has effectively declared this mandate defunct in favor of the rehabilitation of bodies, societies, economies, and “the environment”. That the passing material environment of man is infinitely less important than the eternal abode of his soul, often appears to elude Francis. Indeed, it appears to elude most Catholics whose mantra increasingly coincides with the world’s: Social activism! ... not interior conversion away from this world ... and to Christ.

     Shame! Shame on us! By our silence, our fear of being disparaged by “other Catholics” for the sake of Christ, we condone this travesty — are complicit in it ... even promote it!

     What will motivate us to recognize, and to redress, this frightful and ultimately deadly state of affairs?

     There are, after all, other contenders in this world for the souls of men ... seen and unseen! As our own wick smolders, others blaze! The burning Crescent of Islam, poised like a scimitar, and every bit as deadly, glows and grows in the east, and with it, not an ethnic, but a Religious Cleansing to which the world remains indifferent — an expunging of every vestige of Christianity in partibus infidelium. And even Islam has its secular collaborators: the European Union — once a continent raised up from utter barbarism to a civilization formed and ennobled by its Catholic heritage — will no longer tolerate the inclusion of its indissoluble Christian heritage within its Constitution. Not only does it thoroughly repudiate its own Christian cultural heritage — it prohibits it — even banishes it! This is nothing less than self-loathing. And perhaps it ought to be.

     Surely, then, in our effort to remedy this impending state of dissolution, we will first turn to our bishops, since they are, preeminently, the “Teachers and Guardians of the Faith”. But more often than not — much more often than not — in the well-appointed office at the end of the corridor we do not find a shepherd of souls but a deeply sequestered, occasionally avuncular, and predictably remote ... “administrator.”

     Relegating his prime responsibility as Teacher and Promoter of the Faith ... to others, in the form of Lay committees and subcommittees largely “chaired” by liberal Catholics more concerned with social issues than the salvation of souls, are we confident that the patrimony of our faith will somehow percolate through this strata of already contaminated soil and reach our children authentically and intact? Is our fear mitigated ... or further exacerbated ... by our bishops’ resolute lack of diligence in being attentive to what Catholic colleges and theologians in their own dioceses are really teaching — and who are teaching the teachers ... who, in turn, are teaching our children?

     Do you think that your bishop actually — that is to say, cognitively — is aware of, or even concerned with — what the teachers themselves are actually teaching?

Not in this diocese. Not in Boston. In fact, Cardinal Sean Patrick O’Malley had routinely feted, praised, and held up as exemplary, the clueless “Catechists” who churn out our children to the Sacrament of Confirmation — with no clue whatever of that in which they are being confirmed. By comparison, even the dismal failure of our public schools in Boston must be deemed a stunning success.

     For most of us — especially in the Archdiocese of Boston, but no less elsewhere — the answer is, as they say, a “no-brainer:” it is a universally resounding no. Most of us find, to our growing dismay and deepening cynicism, that our bishops appear to have “more important,” more ... “pressing” things to do ... than to communicate the Faith to the faithful ... especially the children.

     Really, we beg the question: if no one teaches the teachers — who, then, teaches the children? If they are not brought the faith by those to whom it has been entrusted — the bishops, the episcopacy — who will bring it to them?
Will they — how can they — acquire the Faith ... if no one brings it to them? Saint Paul is very clear about this:


“How then shall they call on him, in whom they have not believed? Or how shall they believe him, of whom they have not heard? And how shall they hear, without a preacher? And how shall they preach unless they be sent ...?” (Romans 10.14-15)


     Ask yourself candidly: do you know more ... or less ... of your Catholic faith than your children? Very likely more — although, in all honesty, it is probably little. You politely assent to the now quaint Catholic notion that “parents are the primary teachers of their children,” but knowing little of your own Faith, you simply shell out $175.00 per child and pan off this grave responsibility to others of whom you know nothing, and who themselves largely know nothing of the faith they presume to teach. You go through the motions as careless of what your children are taught in their 10 years of “Religious Education” as your bishop is of what the teachers teach. 10 years later, and $1500 poorer per child, you scratch your head and wonder why Johnny still does not know God, and why Judy never goes to Mass — and yet we have agreed that you know more than your children ...

What, then, we must ask — with growing apprehension — will your children teach their children ...?


What will they — who know even less than you — teach those who know nothing?


Total Ignorance

The momentum, as we see, is inexorable — until it culminates in total ignorance: every generation knows less of their faith than the generation preceding it. It is, in the end, the devolution from doctrine to legend, from legend to fiction, and from fiction to myth.

That is not just a poor, but a stultifying and ultimately deadly patrimony.

This default — at every level — in transmitting the authentic Catholic faith intact ... leaves Jesus question very suddenly very real.

“Recently, a Gallup poll was taken on Catholic attitudes toward Holy Communion. The poll showed serious confusion among Catholics about one of the most basic beliefs of the Church. Only 30 percent of those surveyed believe they are actually receiving the Body and Blood, soul and divinity of the Lord Jesus Christ under the appearance of bread and wine.”

     The problem is more than mathematical; as we have seen, it is exponential. 70% of Catholics do not possess this most fundamental, this most essential understanding of the core article of genuine Catholic doctrine: that “Unless you eat of the flesh of the Son of Man, and drink His Blood, you have no life in you.” Heavy stuff!

     It is not just a matter of the greatest concern, but nothing less than a matter of the gravest dereliction that most Catholics do not realize — do not know — that the very Mass itself is an abbreviation of “The Most Holy Sacrifice of the Mass”, and that it is really a Sacrifice, the actual re-enactment of Calvary before their very eyes!

     This failure of understanding ... culminates in a failure in Faith. It possesses, in significant ways, the remorseless characteristics of mathematical certainties. Not understanding, grasping — having never been taught — the most elementary features of the faith, how can they be understood to possess what they have not acquired, and how can they transmit, pass on, what they do not possess? It is inescapable. 

     Prognostication, of course, is for fools.

     But the words of Christ are certainties that will come to pass.

“Weep not for Me, but for your children”, 5 Christ told the sorrowing women on the road to Calvary.

     Jesus’ question, then — “When the Son of Man comes will He find faith on earth?”—  is not a “rhetorical question” at all; it is a question fraught with enormous significance ... the frightful answer to which appears to be unfolding before our very eyes ... but that is if you take Christ at His word — and given Jesus’ track record on things yet to come, we would do well and wisely to give pause for more than thought.

     Are you worried now ...? Not nearly enough.

And this is all the more frightening still.

Geoffrey K. Mondello
Editor
Boston Catholic Journal

Comments? Write us:  editor@boston-catholic-journal.com

   Printable PDF Version

 

 

___________________________________________________________________________

 

 

The Holy Catholic Faith
Where is it And Who is Keeping it?

The Catholic Church that we Once Knew and Recognize no Longer

Has the Post-Conciliar Church

Lost Custody of the Faith?

 

All indications are that is has

The “Dark Ages” — that disdainful term for the period in history following the collapse of the Roman Empire in 476 A.D. until the 15th century (a period correctly described as the Middle Ages) is understood by the secular world to have lasted roughly 1000 years, beginning in Florence, Italy.

Within the post-Conciliar Catholic Church, however, it appears that the term extends well beyond the 15th century; indeed, some 500 years beyond it! According to contemporary Catholic thought articulated within the past five papacies, the “Dark Ages” really ended in 1965 at the conclusion of the Second Vatican Council. All the doctrines and teachings prior to that Council were only imperfectly, deficiently, and insufficiently articulated or defectively understood.


The 1000 Years of Darkness

Only the Second Vatican Council finally attained to enlightenment in the divine economy, and after 1,965 years of suspension, it alone has provided the final, sufficient, and correct understanding of God and Church, man and nature. Prior to that, according to post-Conciliar thought, Catholics had essentially lived in darkness, specifically the darkness of the “pre-Conciliar Dark Ages.” It may be said that where the Rational Enlightenment “saved the world from religion,” Vatican II saved the Church from Catholicism.

Continue reading

 

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

 


Martyrology for Today

Semen est sanguis Christianorum (The blood of Christians is the seed of the Church) Tertullian, Apologeticum, 50

2004 Roman Martyrology by Month

 

 

 

2004 Roman Martyrology

 

 

Saturday, August 30th in the Year of Grace 2025


This Day, the Thirtieth Day of August

1.  At Rome in the cemetery of Commodilla on the Ostian Way, the holy martyrs Felix and Adauctus, who, confessing Christ together for their undefiled faith, as victors hastened together to heaven.

 

2.  Commemoration of sixty holy martyrs, who, at Colonia Sufetana in Byzacene, after the image of Hermes had been destroyed, were burned with the fury of the pagans.

 

3.  At Rome, the commemoration of Saint Pammachius, a senator, outstanding for his zeal in the faith and generosity to the poor, by whose piety toward God the Titulus Crescentianus was established.

 

4. In the monastery of Rebais in the district of Meaux in Neustria, Saint Aegilius, the first abbot.

 

5.  At Breuil likewise in the district of Meaux, Saint Fiacre, hermit, who, originally from Ireland, led a solitary life.

 

6. At Thessalonica in Macedonia, Saint Fantinus, called the Younger, a hermit, who was perfected for Christ through fasting, vigils, and labors.

 

7.  At Lucedio in the Subalpine region, Saint Bononius, abbot, who first led a hermit’s life in Egypt, then on Mount Sinai.

 

8.  At Trevi in Latium, Saint Peter, who, though unlearned, cultivated the wisdom of the Gospel in solitude.

 

9.  At London in England, Saint Margaret Ward, martyr, who, a married woman, was condemned to death under Queen Elizabeth the First for having helped a priest, and at Tyburn, hanged from the gallows, willingly endured martyrdom. In the same place, blessed martyrs Richard Leigh, priest, and the laymen Edward Shelley and Richard Martin, Englishmen, John Roche, an Irishman, and Richard Lloyd, a Welshman, completed their passion with her: the first because he was a priest, the others because they had received priests.

 

10. At Saluzzo in the Subalpine region, blessed John Juvenal Ancina, bishop, who, formerly a physician, was among the first to join the Oratory of Saint Philip Neri.

 

11. At Caesaraugusta in Spain, blessed María Rafols, virgin, who founded the Congregation of the Sisters of Charity of Saint Anne at the hospital of that city, and governed it with a strong spirit amid many hardships.

 

12.  Likewise, at Almería in Spain, the passion of the blessed martyrs Diego Ventaja Milan, bishop of Almería, and Emmanuel Medina Olmos, of Guadix, who, led into prison out of hatred for the name of Christ, bore injuries and insults with patience until they were killed at night.

 

13.  On the road between Puebla Tornesa and Villafamés near Castellón in Spain, blessed Joachim (Joseph) Ferrer Adell, priest of the Order of Friars Minor Capuchin and martyr, who attained the promised reward through perseverance unto martyrdom.

 

14.  At Santander likewise in Spain, blessed Vincent Cabanes Badenas, priest of the Third Order of Saint Francis of the Capuchins of the Sorrowful Virgin and martyr, who, during the same persecution against the faith, merited to enter the great banquet.

 

15.  At Venegono near Varese in Italy, the passing of blessed Alfredo Ildefonso Schuster, bishop, who, having been elevated from abbot of Saint Paul Outside the Walls to the see of Milan, fulfilled the office of shepherd with extraordinary wisdom for the good of his people.
 

 

__________________________________________________________________

And elsewhere in divers places, many other holy martyrs, confessors, and holy virgins.

Omnes sancti Mártyres, oráte pro nobis.
 (All ye Holy Martyrs, pray for us,” from the Litaniae Sanctorum, the Litany of the Saints)

 ℟. Thanks be to God.

 

 

 

The 1956 edition below, issued during the pontificate of Pope Pius XII, is a revision of the typical edition of 1749, which had been promulgated by Pope Benedict XIV remained the foundational text for later updates throughout the 18th–20th centuries up to 2004 — the English translation of which remained the sole source of the Martyrology until the present translation of the 2004 Roman Martyrology by the Boston Catholic Journal in 2025.

 

 

 

1956 ROMAN MARTYROLOGY

 

Saturday, August 30th  in the Year of Grace 2025


This Day, the Thirtieth Day of August

The feast of St. Rose of St. Mary, virgin, whose birthday is the 26th of this month.

At Rome, on the Ostian road, the martyrdom of the blessed priest Felix, under the emperors Diocletian and Maximian. After being racked he was sentenced to death, and as they led him to execution, he met a man who spontaneously declared himself a Christian, and was forthwith beheaded with him. The Christians not knowing his name, called him Adauctus, because he was added to St. Felix and shared his crown.

Also, at Rome, St. Gaudentia, virgin and martyr, with three others.

In the same city, St. Pammachius, a priest distinguished for learning and holiness.

At Colonia Suffetulana, in Africa, sixty blessed martyrs, who were murdered by the furious Gentiles.

At Adrumetum, also in Africa, the Saints Boniface and Thecla, who were the parents of twelve blessed sons, martyrs.

At Thessalonica, St. Fantinus, confessor, who suffered much from the Saracens, and was driven from his monastery, in which he had lived in great abstinence. After having brought many to the way of salvation, he rested at last at an advanced age.

In the diocese of Meaux, St. Fiacre, confessor.

At Trevi, St. Peter, confessor, who was distinguished for many virtues and miracles. He is honored in that place, whence he departed for Heaven.

At Bologna, St. Bononius, abbot.

And elsewhere in divers places, many other holy martyrs, confessors, and holy virgins.

Omnes sancti Mártyres, oráte pro nobis. (All ye Holy Martyrs, pray for us,” from the Litaniae Sanctorum, the Litany of the Saints)

Response: Thanks be to God.

 

 



1959 Roman Martyrology by Month


 



Why the Martyrs Matter


Each day we bring you a calendar, a list really, of the holy Martyrs who had suffered and died for Christ, for His Bride the Church, and for our holy Catholic Faith; men and women for whom — and well they knew — their Profession of Faith would cost them their lives.

They could have repudiated all three (Christ, Church, and Catholic Faith) and kept their lives for a short time longer (even the lapsi * only postponed their death — and at so great a cost!)

What would motivate men, women, even children and entire families to willingly undergo the most evil and painfully devised tortures; to suffer death rather than denial?

Why did they not renounce their Catholic Faith when the first flame licked at their feet, after the first eye was plucked out, or after they were “baptized” in mockery by boiling water or molten lead poured over their heads? Why did they not flee to offer incense to the pagan gods since such a ritual concession would be merely perfunctory, having been done, after all, under duress, exacted by the compulsion of the state? What is a little burned incense and a few words uttered without conviction, compared to your own life and the lives of those you love? Surely God knows that you are merely placating the state with empty gestures …

Did they love their wives, husbands, children — their mothers, fathers and friends less than we do? Did they value their own lives less? Were they less sensitive to pain than we are? In a word, what did they possess that we do not?

Nothing. They possessed what we ourselves are given in the Sacrament of Confirmation — but cleaved to it in far greater measure than we do: Faith and faithfulness; fortitude and valor, uncompromising belief in the invincible reality of God, of life eternal in Him for the faithful, of damnation everlasting apart from Him for the unfaithful; of the ephemerality of this passing world and all within it, and lives lived in total accord with that adamant belief.

We are the Martyrs to come! What made them so will make us so. What they suffered we will suffer. What they died for, we will die for. If only we will! For most us, life will be a bloodless martyrdom, a suffering for Christ, for the sake of Christ, for the sake of the Church in a thousand ways outside the arena. The road to Heaven is lined on both sides with Crosses, and upon the Crosses people, people who suffered unknown to the world, but known to God. Catholics living in partibus infidelium, under the scourge of Islam. Loveless marriages. Injustices on all sides. Poverty. Illness. Old age. Dependency. They are the cruciform! Those whose lives became Crosses because they would not flee God, the Church, the call to, the demand for, holiness in the most ordinary things of life made extraordinary through the grace of God. The Martyrology we celebrate each day is just a vignette, a small, immeasurably small, sampling of the martyrdom that has been the lives of countless men and women whom Christ and the Angels know, but whom the world does not know.

“Exemplum enim dedi vobis”, Christ said to His Apostles: “I have given you an example.” And His Martyrs give one to us — and that is why the Martyrs matter.

  • A Martyr is one who suffers tortures and a violent death for the sake of Christ and the Catholic Faith.

  • A Confessor is one who confesses Christ publicly in times of persecution and who suffers torture, or severe punishment by secular authorities as a consequence. It is a title given only given to those who suffered for the Faith  —  but was not  killed for it  —   and who had persevered in the Faith until the end.


Geoffrey K. Mondello
Editor
editor@boston-catholic-journal.com
Boston Catholic Journal

Note: We suggest that you explore our newly edited and revised De SS. Martyrum Cruciatibus — The Torments and Tortures of the Christian Martyrs for an in-depth historical account of the sufferings of the Martyrs.

____________________________

* Those early Christians who renounced their Catholic Faith in times of persecution. When confronted with the prospect of torture and death if they held fast to their faith in Christ, they denied Him and their Faith through an act of sacrificing (often incense) to the pagan Roman gods and in so doing kept their lives and/or their freedom and property.

 

 


 

Boston Catholic Journal

Totally Faithful to the Sacred Deposit of Faith entrusted to the Holy See in Rome

Scio opera tua ... quia modicum habes virtutem, et servasti verbum Meum, nec non negasti Nomen Meum 
I know your works ... that you have but little power, and yet you have kept My word, and have not denied My Name.
(Apocalypse 3.8)

Copyright © 2004 - 2025 Boston Catholic Journal. All rights reserved. Unless otherwise stated, permission is granted by the Boston Catholic Journal for the copying and distribution of the articles and audio files under the following conditions:  No additions, deletions, or changes are to be made to the text or audio files in any way, and the copies may not be sold for a profit. In the reproduction, in any format of any image, graphic, text, or audio file, attribution must be given to the Boston Catholic Journal.



Search the Boston Catholic Journal


Basic
Traditional C
atholic
Audio

Free Catholic Audio Library
in Latin & English


Audio Books,
devotions, and
prayers
:
L
isten to them
or download them

completely free


Baltimore

Catechism

online

Baltimore Catechism - the most authoritative Catholic Catechism ever printed

Discover what
the Church

has taught for

2000 Years
before Vatican II

Newly Formatted
with hyperlinks
for improved readability

Read online
or

Download the PDF


The Little Office

The Little Office of the Blessed Virgin Mary
of the
Blessed Virgin Mary


Pope Pius V Catechism of Trent

Catechism of the Council of Trent New Edition

New Edition (free)



Novena to
St Jude

 Novena to St Jude Printable 4-fold with one piece of paper

Printable Booklet
on 1 sheet
of paper, 4-fold, free



The Ancient Douay-Rheims Catholic Bible

Archbishop Carlo
Maria Viganò

Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò

Defending the Immutable Tradition of the Catholic Faith


Lifesite News: Reliable and Solidly Catholic News

Reliable and Solidly
Catholic News


Pope Saint Pius X
Pray for us

Pope Saint Pius X pray for us

“I shall spare myself neither
care nor labor nor vigils for
the salvation of souls”

Home