How do I become Holy?

Let us begin anew with the most pertinent question of our lives. Everything else is either within it or worthless. “How do I become holy? — can I become holy?

Dare I presume to become holy, for to be holy is to be like unto God!”

Tonight, this night, we have asked the question.

Holiness is simply this: perfect conformity to the will of God in all things, at all times, and in all places.
It is to will what God wills.
It is to act as God would have you act.
It is the perfect correspondence between who and what you are, and who and what God wants you to be.
It is that simple.

“Be you therefore perfect …”

“Estote ergo vos perfecti, sicut et Pater vester Caelestis perfectus est” “Be you therefore perfect, as also your Heavenly Father is perfect.” (St. Matthew 5.48)

“And He said to all: If any man will come after Me, let him deny himself, and take up his cross daily, and follow Me.” (St. Luke 9.23)

Attending a seminary will not make you holy — although if you are a straight, heterosexual male who possesses clear masculine attributes, it is likely that you will never be permitted to be ordained: that is reserved for the effeminate or homosexual male only. While this is not Catholic policy (and in fact is contradictory to, and in open defiance of very clear Church teaching), it is nevertheless the actual state of affairs.

One does not take “courses” or “sign up for workshops” in being holy — although there are many good books that will help lead you into holiness — and virtually all of them were published prior to 1960. After the decadent 1960s and the cataclysmic collapse of the Church following Vatican II within that same decade, quite nearly everything published under the auspices of the title “Catholic” — was not.

The self-inflicted wound that came to be called “Ecumenism” simply meant repudiating, renouncing, and even vilifying what is authentically, historically, and uniquely Catholic in a failed effort to assuage the animus of those hostile to us — or, as happened more often, simply to apostatize to religious indifferentism (all religions are equally good and all lead to the same God) … and eventually came to mean little more than a thinly veiled pantheism. ¹ In effect, we became “them” who refused to become “us”.

Tearing Christ from the Cross — the New Imperative of “Horizontal Worship”

In other words, following Vatican II, Christ was torn from the Cross and for Modernist Catholics the Cross became a token of shame — an embarrassing vestige of their once thoroughly supernatural religion which has been "corrected and rehabilitated by "enlightened” and Modernist theologians, bishops, priests, and Religious. Religion is far more horizontal (pertaining to people, politics, economies, and the new goddess of environmentalism, Mother Earth) than it is vertical (pertaining to worshipping, loving, and serving God alone and preeminently above all else). We really worship God best by focusing on the socio-sexual and political “needs” of others — not by (vertically) worshipping God in Himself as we had done for over 2000 years in the Dark Ages preceding Aggiornamento in 1963.

To be a (traditional) Catholic (that is to say, one faithful to the historical Magisterium and teaching of the Catholic Church … in other words, a Catholic) was to be “intolerant” — although this intolerance oddly did not apply to Judaism, Protestantism, Buddhism, Hinduism, or Islam (which did not and still does not accept or tolerate most Catholic dogma) — or even Atheism and Secularism within that same period … and even now. Only Catholics, apparently, have the capacity for and susceptibility to “intolerance”. Anyone, of course, who holds fast to a teaching, doctrine, or dogma, does not accept as licit anything to the contrary and vigorously opposes what conflicts with that teaching: for it is what of necessity differentiates ideas, concepts and, yes, religions, rather than conflating them into a contradictory and irreconcilable pudding that is meant to be agreeable to everyone (but God) however much it flies in the face of reason and logic (demigods in modern theology's pantheon of gods of a lesser nature than the real God, but equally repudiated in favor of emotivism — that is to say, how we feel and what makes us feel good).

The impediment of logic

Even logic itself is tossed aside as an impediment to the countless irreconcilable contradictions inherent in Ecumenism. To wit, the Law of the non-contradition holds that two things cannot both be and not be at one and the same time. You are reading this column or you are not reading this column. You cannot be both reading and not reading this column. It is an inescapable contradiction. “The Holy Eucharist is really and truly the Body and Blood of Christ ” and “The Holy Eucharist is not really and truly the Body and Blood of Christ” are reciprocally contradictory and mutually exclusive statements (and beliefs). It either is, or it is not, really and truly the Body and Blood of Christ. It logically (and even existentially) cannot be both. Perhaps logic itself was the first casualty of Vatican II and Ecumenism.

Capitalists, as another example, have very distinct and differing concepts of economies from Communists. Each will argue that its own ideology is incompatible with and contradictory to the others’. Ideologically there can be no Capitalist Communists, or Communist Capitalists. They are not just different, or even contrasting, but opposing ideologies.

Pro-Lifers and Pro-Abortionists also have distinct and differing concepts that logically conflict with one another. Ideologically there can be no Pro-life Pro-Abortionists, or Pro-Abortion Pro-Lifers. Once again, they are not just different, but opposing ideologies. Each is subtended by differing and opposite views on life, conception, death, and murder.

However … and oddly enough, only Pro-life advocates are intolerant, while Pro-Abortion advocates are not … hmmmm….

But to return to holiness: as we have seen, Christ calls us to perfection, and this entails denying oneself daily (very difficult, but doable), taking up the Cross (not a very pleasant thing to do) and following Him (the success of which alone is afforded by both Sanctifying Grace and Actual Grace — century-old terms no longer used because they are no longer taught or understood).

The hard work of holiness

This is the work of holiness, of personal sanctification — and there is no more urgent need in our lives.

Forget about:

“oppressive and sinful ‘structures’ in the world”
“inclusivism”
feminist “language neutering”

“structural sin”
“collaborative ministry”
“oppressive patriarchal structures”
“social justice” (this comes with holiness, not before it)
“social and political 'activism'”

This is the language of the world, of liberal academia, of militant feminism — not of Christ. It is the language of those who detest the Church but remain within her for “a living”; it is the childish and neologistic ravings of dissident theologians and radical feminists (also making a living off the Church). They are “catholic” in being “universally” contemptible of the Church and Her teachings. They have left being “Catholic” long ago.

None of this will lead you to holiness. None of it.

Only Christ can. And He does:

If any man will come after me, let him deny himself, and take up his cross daily, and follow Me.” (St. Luke 9.23)
“Be you therefore perfect, as also your heavenly Father is perfect.” (St. Matthew 5.48)

An intimate affair

Holiness is an intimate affair — between you and God.

He does not ask you, anywhere in the Gospels, to change the world … but to change yourself — to take up your Cross and to follow Him ... not the world. ²

He is our paradigm of Holiness ... as is His Holy Mother Mary who gave us that beautiful, immemorial utterance, "Be it done to me according to thy word." (St. Luke 1.37) In other words, as we said earlier, only conformity to the will of God — not the world — is the essence of holiness.

Imitate them. Not the world, just as Saint Paul did: “Imitate me, just as I also imitate Christ.”³

Please God, let us now also say with Saint Paul, “I live, now not I; but Christ liveth in me.” ⁴

Saint John, perhaps, sums it up best:

“Love not the world, nor the things which are in the world. If any man love the world, the charity of the Father is not in him. For all that is in the world, is the concupiscence of the flesh, and the concupiscence of the eyes, and the pride of life, which is not of the Father, but is of the world. And the world passeth away, and the concupiscence thereof: but he that doth the will of God, abideth for ever. (1 John 2.15-17)

Whom and what, then, will you follow if you seek to be holy? Christ or the world? It is absolutely clear that you cannot follow both. Each path diverges totally from the other, and the longer you remain on one path the farther you will be from the other.

Geoffrey K. Mondello
Editor
Boston Catholic Journal

Printable PDF Version

Comments? Write us: editor@boston-catholic-journal.com

_________________________________________________

¹ http://www.dioceseofraleigh.org/news/view.aspx?id=1289
“Pope Benedict XVI leads an interfaith peace meeting in the Basilica of St. Mary of the Angels in Assisi, Italy, Oct. 27. Pictured, from left, are: Archbishop Norvan Zakarian of the Armenian Apostolic Church, Anglican Archbishop Rowan Williams of Canterbury and Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew of Constantinople, Pope Benedict, Rabbi David Rosen, representing the chief rabbinate of Israel; Wande Abimbola, president of a Nigerian institute that promotes the study of the culture and traditional religion of the Yoruba people; and Shrivatsa Goswami, a Hindu delegate”.

http://www.foxnews.com/world/2011/10/27/rainbow-religious-leaders-join-pope-for-peace/
“ASSISI, Italy (AP) – “Pope Benedict XVI joined Buddhist monks, Islamic scholars, Yoruba leaders and a handful of agnostics in making a communal call for peace Thursday, insisting that religion must never be used as a pretext for war or terrorism. Benedict welcomed some 300 leaders representing a rainbow of faiths to the hilltop Italian town of Assisi to commemorate the 25th anniversary of a daylong prayer for peace here called by Pope John Paul II in 1986 amid Cold War conflicts.

Standing on the altar of St. Mary of the Angels basilica, Wande Abimbola of Nigeria, representing Africa's traditional Yoruba religion, sang and shook a percussion instrument as he told the delegates that peace can only come with greater respect for indigenous religions.

"We must always remember that our own religion, along with the religions practiced by other people, are valid and precious in the eyes of the Almighty, who created all of us with such plural and different ways of life and belief systems," he said.

http://www.zenit.org/en/articles/sant-egidio-founder-on-1986-assisi-meeting-of-religious-leaders
Blessed John Paul II, on the contrary, intuited the public force of religions, despite secularization. He knew that religions could be attractive to war-like passions. Worried about the cold war, he invited leaders of Christian religions and other world religions to Assisi.

² St. Matthew 4.8; St. Mark 4.19; St. Luke 4.5, 12.30; St. John 7.7, 14.17, 15.19, 16.33, 17.9, 17.14, 17.16; Gal. 6.14; Colossians 2.8, 2.20; 2 St. Peter 1.4, 2.20; 1 St. John 2.15-17
³ I Cor. 11
⁴ Gal. 2.20

**Totally Faithful to the Sacred Deposit of Faith entrusted to the Holy See in Rome**

“Scio opera tua ... quia modicum habes virtutem, et servasti verbum Meum, nec non negasti Nomen Meum”
“I know your works ... that you have but little power, and yet you have kept My word, and have not denied My Name.” (Apocalypse 3.8)

Copyright © 2004 - 2023 Boston Catholic Journal. All rights reserved. Unless otherwise stated, permission is granted by the Boston Catholic Journal for the copying and distribution of the articles and audio files under the following conditions: No additions, deletions, or changes are to be made to the text or audio files in any way, and the copies may not be sold for a profit. In the reproduction, in any format of any image, graphic, text, or audio file, attribution must be given to the Boston Catholic Journal.