  
				
				  
				  
				
				
				
				 
				CRITICAL CATHOLIC COMMENTARY
				
				in the Twilight of Reason
				
				
					
						
							
								
									
										
											 
											  
											  
											
												
													
														
															
																
																	
																		
																		
																		 
																	 
																 
															 
														 
													 
												 
											 
											
												Mary, Conceived without 
												Sin, 
												pray for us who 
												have recourse to Thee 
												 
											  
											       
											
											
											 
											  
			
										
									
								
							
						
					
				
				
					  
					  
					  
					
						
							 
							The Most Urgent Question 
							of Our Time:
							
							“When 
							the Son of Man Comes, will He Find Faith on Earth?” 
							
							(St. Luke 18.8) 
							  
							
							 No 
							more stunning, 
							no more frightening, and perhaps no more ominously portentous 
							words are spoken in all the Gospels, in fact, in the 
							entire New Testament — perhaps even in the entirety 
							of Sacred Scripture itself; words that have become increasingly 
							fraught with significance with every passing year of 
							the most unfortunate papacy of Francis — a papacy not 
							just  likely … but I believe with certainty … will 
							be understood not simply as among the worst … but the 
							worst … the most destructive to the Faith and to the 
							Church in the annals of 2000 years of Church history.
							
  Indeed, with every generation following that devastating 
							Second Vatican Council — that scorched earth assault 
							on Tradition and historical Catholicism — the question 
							increasingly verges on an implied and obvious answer. 
							 We must wonder if the question that Christ poses 
							… “When the Son of Man comes will He find Faith on earth?” 
							… is, in fact, spoken of this generation, or of one 
							soon — very soon, to come.    As with so many of Christ’s teachings, this troubling question 
							is too often and too deftly explained away — especially 
							by the overwhelming number of the liberal theologians 
							and bishops who have proliferated and multiplied since 
							1962 — which is to say, by “the 
							learned and the wise”. If we heed them, it would 
							appear that either Christ does not know what He 
							is saying, or we do not know what He is saying 
							— although we all agree that He said something 
							... that sounds suspiciously clear.
							   
							
							We must, however, pay careful attention to these twelve 
							words, …. perhaps more now than at any other time in Church history. 
							
 
  “When the Son of Man 
							comes will He find Faith on earth?” 
							
							These are twelve words, however, to which we must pay 
							careful attention, perhaps more now than at any other 
							time in Church history. 
							 
							However reluctant we are to take Christ at His word 
							— which becomes increasingly inconvenient to us — we 
							must recognize that Jesus never spoke idly: His words, 
							His teachings — and yes, His Commandments — were 
							always uttered to one explicit end: the salvation of 
							souls — attaining to Heaven and everlasting happiness 
							and to avoiding Hell and eternal misery.  
							
							 
							The Jewish religious authorities —
							“the learned” of His own 
							time — had scornfully dismissed Christ’s warning that 
							not so much as stone would remain standing in the great 
							Temple 1 
							... the very Temple within which, 70 years later, these 
							words were fulfilled when Rome laid waste in days what 
							took 46 years to build.  
							
							 
							We tend to view such alarming statements made by Jesus 
							— and there are many — with the same scorn and disdain 
							today. 
							
							 
							Indeed ... what has become of the “Faith of our Fathers?”
							 
							
							 
							A mere fifty years ago we ourselves would have instinctively 
							replied “Of course He will find faith! There 
							simply must be some deeper, some obscure and less evident 
							meaning to this that we do not presently understand 
							— and what He appears to be saying, He is 
							not really saying at all. Surely the “learned” of 
							our own day can deftly explain the answer to this troubling 
							question. In the end, they will conclude, Jesus is 
							really asking something entirely different from what 
							He appears to be asking and that it has nothing 
							to do with our very real defection from the Faith.” 
							
							 
							It is likely that many Jews of Jesus’ time — both the 
							learned and the unlearned — had replied in much the 
							same way. In fact, they did.   
							
							 
							In other words, to us, our faith, the Faith of the Catholic 
							Church for two millennia, could no sooner disappear 
							than ... well, the stones of the great Temple 2000 years 
							ago! 
							
							 
							If, however, we take a careful inventory of our present 
							and undeniably dismal and increasingly scandalous situation 
							in the Church — especially as it has unfolded in the 
							last five decades — Jesus does not quite appear as ... 
							“perplexing” ... as so many apparently make Him to be.
							
 
  
							Candidly 
							Ask yourself the following: 
							
							Has the Faith — the Catholic Faith — flourished 
							in the last 50 years, or has it withered? 
							
							 
							Are vocations to the Priesthood and Religious life
							growing or dwindling? 
							
							 
							Are Catholics having more children or are they 
							having fewer children? 
							
							 
							Are Missionary efforts, to the end of (dare we 
							say it?) “conversion” as mandated by Christ
							encouraged 
							as intrinsic to Catholicism — or are they discouraged 
							as impolite, obtrusive, culturally imperialistic and 
							inherently inimical to the “Ecumenical spirit of Vatican 
							II” — especially as interpreted by Pope Francis for 
							whom “proselytism is solemn nonsense,” to use his own 
							words, words that mock the sacrifices of countless 
							missionary saints through the 2000 years preceding Vatican 
							II’s 
							
							“more enlightened” 
							understanding  of the 
							
							Great Commission*?
							 
							
							 
							Rather, we find that “conversion” to Christ and His 
							Church is actively discouraged — that especially 
							under Pope Francis it is no longer understood as 
							a holy and inherently necessary endeavor — instead, 
							it is disdained, even dismissed, as “socially and culturally 
							incorrect” — indeed, we find that promoting our 
							Catholic Faith — as Christ has commanded us to— 
							has been  forbidden by Francis and his “progressive” 
							coterie of feckless and disaffected cardinals and bishops! 
							What pope, prior to Vatican II, could ever have envisioned 
							this? 
							
							 
							Is our understanding of the Catholic Church, as an
							absolutely unique institution indispensable to the 
							ordinary means of salvation, emphasized as urgently 
							today (if it is emphasized at all) as it was a hundred 
							years ago? Fifty years ago? Indeed, is the concept itself 
							— of the singularity and indispensability of the Holy 
							Catholic Church — still deemed an actual dogma 
							and a viable concept at all? 
							
							 
							For all our insolence and equivocation, we know the 
							answers, and we are uncomfortable with them, for they 
							fly in the face of Christ and all that He taught — to 
							say nothing of Sacred Scripture, Holy Tradition, and 
							the Sacred Deposit of the Faith entrusted to the Catholic 
							Church by God Himself.  
							
							 
							Indeed, Christ’s question takes on a greater sense of 
							urgency still, for the sheep are scattered and confused 
							as never before. The papacy of Francis has been disastrous 
							for the Church. Why? Precisely because he has taken 
							Vatican II to its logical conclusion: the irrelevance 
							of the Church.
  
							
							Ubi 
							est Pastor? 
							
							Where is the Shepherd? 
							Who is earnestly addressing this spiritual malaise and 
							religious decay due to the indolence and dereliction 
							of the vast majority of American and European bishops 
							who appear far more eager for secular plaudits than 
							the now quaint and discredited notion of “the salvation 
							of souls.” Pope Francis has effectively declared this 
							mandate defunct in favor of the rehabilitation of bodies, 
							societies, economies, and “the environment”. That the
							passing material environment of man is infinitely 
							less important than the eternal abode of his 
							soul, often appears to elude Francis. Indeed, it appears 
							to elude most Catholics whose mantra increasingly coincides 
							with the world’s: Social activism! ... not interior conversion away from this world ... and 
							to Christ. 
							
							 
							Shame! Shame on us! By our silence, our fear of being 
							disparaged by “other Catholics” for the sake of Christ, 
							we condone this travesty — are complicit in it 
							... even promote it!  
							
							 
							What will motivate us to recognize, and to redress, 
							this frightful and ultimately deadly state of affairs?
							 
							
							 
							There are, after all, other contenders in this world 
							for the souls of men ... seen and unseen! As our own 
							wick smolders, others blaze! The burning Crescent of 
							Islam, poised like a scimitar, and every bit as deadly, 
							glows and grows in the east, and with it, not an ethnic, but a 
							Religious Cleansing 
							to which the world remains indifferent — an expunging 
							of every vestige of Christianity in partibus infidelium. 
							And even Islam has its secular collaborators: the European 
							Union — once a continent raised up from utter barbarism 
							to a civilization formed and ennobled by its Catholic 
							heritage — will no longer tolerate the inclusion of 
							its indissoluble Christian heritage within its Constitution. 
							Not only does it thoroughly repudiate its own Christian 
							cultural heritage — it prohibits it — even banishes it! This is nothing less than self-loathing. 
							And perhaps it ought to be. 
  
							
							 
							Surely, then, in our effort to remedy this impending 
							state of dissolution, we will first turn to our bishops, 
							since they are, preeminently, the “Teachers and Guardians 
							of the Faith”. But more often than not — much more often 
							than not — in the well-appointed office at the end of 
							the corridor we do not find a shepherd of souls but 
							a deeply sequestered, occasionally avuncular, and predictably 
							remote ... “administrator.” 
							
							 
							Relegating his prime responsibility as Teacher and Promoter 
							of the Faith ... to others, in the form of Lay committees 
							and subcommittees largely “chaired” by liberal Catholics 
							more concerned with social issues than the salvation 
							of souls, are we confident that the patrimony of our 
							faith will somehow percolate through this strata of 
							already contaminated soil and reach our children authentically 
							and intact? Is our fear mitigated ... or further exacerbated 
							... by our bishops’ resolute lack of diligence in being 
							attentive to what Catholic colleges and theologians 
							in their own dioceses are really teaching — and who 
							are teaching the teachers ... who, in turn, are teaching 
							our children?  
							
							 
							Do you think that your bishop actually — that is to 
							say, cognitively — is aware of, or even concerned with 
							— what the teachers themselves are actually teaching?
							 
							
							 
							Not in this diocese. Not 
							in Boston. In fact, our former Cardinal Sean Patrick O’Malley had 
							routinely feted, praised, and held up as exemplary, 
							the clueless “Catechists” who churn out our children 
							to the Sacrament of Confirmation — with no clue whatever 
							of that in which they are being confirmed. By comparison, 
							even the dismal failure of our public schools in Boston 
							must be deemed a stunning success. 
							
							 
							For most of us — especially in the Archdiocese of Boston, 
							but no less elsewhere — the answer is, as they say, 
							a “no-brainer:” it is a universally resounding no. 
							Most of us find, to our growing dismay and deepening 
							cynicism, that our bishops appear to have “more important,” 
							more ... “pressing” things to do ... than to communicate 
							the Faith to the faithful ... especially the children. 
							
							 
							Really, we beg the question: if no one teaches the teachers 
							— who, then, teaches the children? If they are not brought 
							the faith by those to whom it has been entrusted — the 
							bishops, the episcopacy — who will bring it to them? Will they — 
							how can they — acquire the Faith 
							... if no one brings it to them? Saint Paul is very 
							clear about this: 
							
								
									
									 
									“How then shall they call 
									on him, in whom they have not believed? Or how 
									shall they believe him, of whom they have not 
									heard? And how shall they hear, without a preacher? 
									And how shall they preach unless they be sent 
									...?” (Romans 10.14-15) 
								 
							 
							
							  Ask yourself candidly: do you know more ... or less ... 
							of your Catholic faith than your children? Very likely 
							more — although, in all honesty, it is probably little. 
							You politely assent to the now quaint Catholic notion 
							that “parents are the primary teachers of their children,” 
							but knowing little of your own Faith, you simply shell 
							out $175.00 per child and pan off this grave responsibility 
							to others of whom you know nothing, and who themselves 
							largely know nothing of the faith they presume to teach. 
							You go through the motions as careless of what your 
							children are taught in their 10 years of “Religious 
							Education” as your bishop is of what the teachers teach. 
							10 years later, and $1500 poorer per child, you scratch 
							your head and wonder why Johnny still does not know 
							God, and why Judy never goes to Mass — and yet we have 
							agreed that you know more than your children ... 
							 What, then, we must ask — with growing apprehension 
							— will your children teach their children 
							...? 
							
							 What will they — who know even less than 
							you 
							— teach those who know nothing? 
							 
							 Total Ignorance 
							
							The momentum, as we see, 
							is inexorable — until it culminates in total ignorance: 
							every generation knows less of their faith than the 
							generation preceding it. It is, in the end, the devolution 
							from doctrine to legend, from legend to fiction, and 
							from fiction to myth. 
							
							 
							That is not just a poor, 
							but a stultifying and ultimately deadly patrimony. 
							
							 
							This default — at every 
							level — in transmitting the authentic Catholic faith 
							intact ... leaves Jesus’ 
							question very suddenly very real. 
							
								
									
										
											
												
												“Recently, 
												a Gallup poll was taken on Catholic 
												attitudes toward Holy Communion. 
												The poll showed serious confusion 
												among Catholics about one of the 
												most basic beliefs of the Church. 
												Only 30 percent of those surveyed 
												believe they are actually receiving 
												the Body and Blood, soul and divinity 
												of the Lord Jesus Christ under the 
												appearance of bread and wine.” 
											 
										 
									 
								 
							 
							
							 
							The problem is more than mathematical; as we have seen, 
							it is exponential. 70% of Catholics do not possess this 
							most fundamental, this most essential understanding 
							of the core article of genuine Catholic doctrine: that
							“Unless you eat of the flesh of 
							the Son of Man, and drink His Blood, you have no life 
							in you.” Heavy stuff! 
 
  
							It is not just a matter of the greatest concern, but nothing 
							less than a matter of the gravest dereliction that most 
							Catholics do not realize — do not know — that the 
							very Mass itself is an abbreviation of “The Most 
							Holy Sacrifice of the Mass”, and that it is really a
							Sacrifice, the actual re-enactment of Calvary 
							before their very eyes!
 
  
							This failure of understanding ... culminates in a failure 
							in Faith. It possesses, in significant ways, the remorseless 
							characteristics of mathematical certainties. Not understanding, 
							grasping — having never been taught — the most elementary 
							features of the faith, how can they be understood to 
							possess what they have not acquired, and how can they 
							transmit, pass on, what they do not possess? It is inescapable. 
							 
							
							 
							Prognostication, of course, is for fools. 
							 
							
							 
							But the words of Christ are certainties that will come 
							to pass. 
							
							
							 
							“Weep not for Me, but for your children,”
							5 Christ 
							told the sorrowing women on the road to Calvary. 
  
							
							Jesus’ question, then — “When 
							the Son of Man comes will He find faith on earth?”—  
							is not a “rhetorical question” at all; it is a question 
							fraught with enormous significance ... the frightful 
							answer to which appears to be unfolding before our very 
							eyes ... but that is if you take Christ at His word 
							— and given Jesus’ track record on things yet to come, 
							we would do well and wisely to give pause for more than 
							thought. 
  Are you worried now ...? Not nearly enough. 
							 And this is all the more frightening still. 
							
   
						Geoffrey K. Mondello Editor Boston Catholic Journal 
						
						Comments? Write us:  
						
						editor@boston-catholic-journal.com 
						
						
						
						   
						
						
						Printable PDF Version 
						   
					
						
							___________________________________________________________________________ 
							   
						  
						  
						
						
						The Holy Catholic Faith
						
						Where is it And Who is Keeping 
						it?
						
						
						 
						
						Has the
						Post-Conciliar Church
						
						Lost Custody 
						of the Faith?
						  
						
						All 
						indications are that is has 
						
						The “Dark Ages” — that disdainful 
						term for the period in history following the collapse of 
						the Roman Empire in 476 A.D. until the 15th century 
						(a period correctly described as the Middle Ages) 
						is understood by the secular world to have lasted 
						roughly 1000 years, beginning in Florence, Italy. 
						
						Within the post-Conciliar 
						Catholic Church, however, it appears that the term extends 
						well beyond the 15th century; indeed, some 500 
						years beyond it! According to contemporary Catholic thought 
						articulated within the past five papacies, the “Dark Ages” 
						really ended in 1965 at the conclusion of the Second 
						Vatican Council. All the doctrines and teachings prior 
						to that Council were only imperfectly, deficiently, and 
						insufficiently articulated or defectively understood.
						   
						
						
							
							The 1000 Years of 
			Darkness 
							
							     Only 
			the Second Vatican Council finally attained to enlightenment 
			in the divine economy, and after 1,965 years of suspension, it alone 
			has provided the final, sufficient, and correct understanding 
			of God and Church, man and nature. Prior to that, according to post-Conciliar 
			thought, Catholics had essentially lived in darkness, specifically the 
			darkness of the “pre-Conciliar Dark Ages.” It may be said that where 
			the Rational Enlightenment “saved the world from religion,” Vatican 
			II saved the Church from Catholicism. 
							
							     This argument 
			— that God concealed the “real” truth from us for either 1500 
			years on the one hand (concerning Protestants) or for 2000 years on 
			other (concerning Vatican II) does not, of course, speak well of God’s 
			munificence, truth, or goodness — and that it is the very argument 
			to be brought against Protestants by Catholics, is good to keep in mind. 
			Why would a good, loving, and truthful God conceal the real nature 
			of the Church, the Sacraments, and true worship from us for so long? 
							
							 
							Pay No Attention 
			to What You See! 
							
							   
							 We are 
							told so many times that what we see is no indication 
							of what is real.  
							
							     It is true in 
			two venues: the political landscape, which is really of 
			not much interest to us here except as a paradigm of our being told 
			that what we perceive to be oppressive, unjust, and despotic, is really 
			a benevolent government open to all its constituents. We are simply 
			not socially-enlightened enough (“woke” enough) to see it, you understand. 
							
							     The other venue, 
			of course, is the ecclesiastical landscape, specifically 
			the Vatican, and more specifically the papacies of the Vatican II pontiffs 
			and the various Dicasteries under them. Within this crumbling landscape 
			we are told that all the dismantling, removal, renovation, and ultimately 
			the detritus following Vatican II has resulted in a more beautiful, 
			vibrant, healthy, and faithful Church, with pews filled at Sunday Masses; 
			a Church brimming with baptisms, confirmations, marriages, vocations, 
			ordinations … a chrysalis bursting in a renewal of all things 
			holy and good! We are simply too “rigid,” too “backward,” not “progressive-enough” 
			to see it. Because we do not “walk in Accompaniment with the Spirit,” 
			we are blind … you understand.  
							
							     From Bergoglio’s 
			dismissive perspective, “looking back (indietrismo) is useless,”
							
							1
							and given Francis’s insolent 
			treatment of those who worship as our forefathers did for 200 centuries, 
			they are equally useless as well. They are impediments to his progressive 
			agenda; to use his words, they are “imbavagliando,” “gagging” the Church.2 
							
							     His aggressively 
			Modernist agenda set in motion by Vatican II, apparently, is too far 
			advanced for the possibility of retrenching. It is “useless” to even 
			entertain the possibility of rapprochement with the Mass of the 
			Ages and the 2000-year spirituality inseparable from it; a Mass within 
			which we immediately find sanctity, solemnity, sacrality, holiness, 
			heavenliness, beauty, spirituality, form, sobriety, chant, mystery, 
			the choir of angels; in short, all that is egregiously absent 
			within the bland, mundane, and very worldly Novus Ordo 
							“Mass
							of Paul VI.” 
							  
							
							What, Exactly, are We 
			to Understand by “Keeping — and Having Kept — the Catholic 
			Faith”? 
							
							     The notions of 
			Keeping, and having kept, the Catholic Faith can only be 
			understood as retaining (keeping), and having preserved (kept), the
							one true holy Catholic and Apostolic Faith that has 
							been kept and practiced for the 2000 years prior to Vatican 
			II — even when the practice of that venerable Faith has been unjustly 
			deprived through ecclesiastical duress. That unchanging and unchangeable 
			Faith is kept in the unwavering allegiance to it despite persecution 
			and even deprivation. It can be physically removed from us, but 
			it cannot be taken away from us.  
							
							     Indeed, why do 
			we keep anything at all?  We only keep what we want and value;
							what is good and beautiful. Understanding this, we must ask, 
			is there anything more beautiful this side of Heaven than the Most Holy 
			Sacrifice of the Mass? … than the Faith bequeathed to us by our fathers, 
			by the Saints, by the Martyrs — the Faith that has generated the greatest 
			and most brilliant constellation of saints and martyrs in the history 
			of the Church? 
							
							     It 
							cannot 
			be the case that Faith of the Church for the 2000 years preceding 
			December 8, 1965 (when the Second Vatican Council was formally concluded) 
			is no longer the Faith of the Church now — for if the Faith 
			is different then the Church, which is the embodiment of that Faith, 
			is different, and if the Church is different, the Church is no more. 
			This cannot be. Christ promised that this cannot be. 
							
							     But it 
							can 
			be said that the teaching of the Church is now vastly 
			different from the teaching of the Church for the 200 centuries prior 
			to John XXIII and his five successors, and most especially in what are 
			presented to us as the “Conciliar” documents of Vatican II, documents 
			that vastly, even essentially, diverge from centuries 
			of incontestably authoritative Catholic teaching.  
							
							     So much so, in 
			fact, that in its latest iteration under the papacy of Francis, we have 
			begun to ask in earnest, perhaps for the first time in our lives, “has 
			the post-Conciliar Catholic Church, or perhaps more accurately, the 
			“Post-Catholic-Conciliar-Church” — an increasingly different 
			Church that first emerged from Vatican II and has continued to 
			diverge from it through every successive papacy until that rupture with 
			the past has culminated in a Church, together with its hierarchy, largely 
			lost custody of the Catholic Faith? 
							
							 
							Loathsome 
							
							
							     
							Since beginning this article some days ago, some alarming news has begun 
			to emerge from credible sources that has necessarily changed the tenor 
			of this discussion, one which, much to our consternation, now 
			concerns not simply the nature of the custody of the Faith vis-à-vis 
			the papacy of Francis and the disaffected ecclesiastical apparatus in 
			the Vatican under him, but concerning nothing less than the 
							integrity* 
			of the Catholic Faith itself. It has come to our attention that under 
			the direction of Pope Francis, English Cardinal Arthur Roche, prefect 
			of the Congregation for Divine Worship, together with other powerful 
			figures within the Roman Curia are preparing to completely abolish  
			— for all time — and with no possibility of reclaiming 
			— what they perceive as the threat posed by the celebration of the Holy 
			Sacrifice of the Mass in Latin — in other words, The Latin Mass, TLM, 
			as it has been celebrated for 2000 years which must yield 
			to the Novus Ordo (New Order) “Mass of Paul VI”
							exclusively — a Mass now barely half a century (54 years) 
			in the making … and still in the making. In order to accomplish 
			this with absolute, clinical exactitude, Francis & Friends have determined 
			to stamp out the Latin Mass as something loathsome.  
       Such fear of something holy! As though the Mass of 2000 
			years can be shackled and plunged into a dungeon of unfathomable depth, 
			hidden from sight, concealed as a destructive secret, and made irrecoverable 
			to memory! How can we begin to imagine such malice in the Church toward 
			those within the Church; how are we to begin to grasp the Church 
			promulgating such an evil law and with an iron fist as hateful 
			as the crushing fist of any petty dictator?   
							
							
							Too 
			Catholic (for Ecumenism) 
							
							     
							
							The Latin Mass, however, must go: apart from the many contrived and 
			ultimately superficial reasons for abolishing the Latin Mass, the principal 
			reason is this: it is an impediment to Ecumenism, the 
			very corner-stone of Vatican II. This is the real reason 
			behind the vitriolic, almost pathological animosity exhibited toward 
			the Latin Mass by the liberal, Modernist Church of Vatican II and its 
			principal proponent, Jorge Bergoglio: The Latin Mass is not amenable 
			to non-Catholics; it is … too Catholic, it bears within itself 
			the history, the memory, the devotion, the filial love of two hundred 
			centuries of generations of Catholics who cleaved to the Faith through 
			persecution and hardship and for many, to the point of the shedding 
			of their blood.  
							
							     
			Dwindling participation on the Novus Ordo (Vernacular) Mass, 
			and an alarming increase in participation in the (Latin) Mass, especially 
			among young Catholics, appears to be the principal motivation behind 
			this draconian measure. The belief that Traditional Catholics will become 
			Vernacular “Paul VI Mass” Catholics by heavy-handed decree; that they 
			will be forced into this free-form Mass by Procrustean measures, is 
			nearly delusional. It will not happen. I do not know what will 
			happen, but I am confident that this fiction will not occur. Schism 
			may occur. Were this the case, it would appear from several informed 
			sources that Francis himself would be the formal cause of schism, and 
			hence the Schismatic. This is not a shocking possibility. 
							
							     Of course, we 
			must ponder the question on everyone's mind: the fearful question that 
			wrenches our gut:  where do Traditional Catholics go from here 
			— should the hammer fall on the Faithful?   
							
							Who is To Answer This? 
							
							     Shall Canon Lawyers 
			decide this … who are part of the very ecclesiastical apparatus that 
			is prejudicial against the continued celebration of the Latin Mass?  
			Even were Canon Lawyers able to answer this (they are not), it 
			is not theirs to decide, for: 
							
								
									
									Ecclesiastical law derives its formal authority from the supreme 
					legislator understood as the reigning Roman Pontiff who, 
					in his person, “possesses the totality of legislative, executive, 
					and judicial power.”  
								 
							 
							
							     In other words,
							since there is no superior above the pope, 
							3
							Francis 
			is exempt from, and not subject to, Canon Law 
							… and will do as he has ever done: whatever 
			he wills —  which, as a matter of record, has not 
			always, or even often, been just, or even good. 
							
							     Francis alone, 
			then — temporally speaking — will determine where Traditional Catholics 
			go from here, and given his outspoken animosity toward the Latin Mass 
			that preceded Vatican II for 2000 years, and his even greater contempt 
			for Traditional Catholics, it appears that he is prepared to offer us
							two options only:    
							
								
									- 
									
									Go to the 
									Novus Ordo (New 
					Order) “Mass of Paul VI”      
   
									- 
									
									The second option is intended to 
					be optimally coercive:  No Mass at all. Essentially,
									“Attend the Novus 
					Ordo Mass or leave the Church.”    
									 
								 
							 
							
							     What 
							crime, 
			we must ask, have these Catholics committed in continuing to 
			worship in Latin (until Francis repealed Summorum Pontificum, 
			three years ago in Traditionis Custodes, 2021) as their Catholic 
			Religion has always worshipped up to a mere 70 years ago? Is this 
			the crime that will cause them to be expelled from the 
			Church?  
  
							
							
							     Who is prepared 
			to call the Tridentine Mass —
							the worship of God in Latin — a 
							crime?  
							
							     This Missal,
							This Mass (the Tridentine Mass), promulgated in 
							Quo Primum 
			(Pope Pius V, 1570): 
							
							“Grant[s] 
			to all priests of the Latin Rite the right to celebrate the Roman Mass 
			[0f 1570] in perpetuity.”4 
  
							
							     Whether or not, 
			under the iron fist and the unbending will of Francis, matters come 
			to such a destructive, divisive, and unimaginably ignominious conclusion 
			remains to be seen. Perhaps it is rumor after all. By all accounts, 
			we will know by mid-July.  
							
							     
			Why the Vatican has said nothing to quash these rumors is a matter of 
			ominous speculation. 
							  
							
							
							Editor Saturday, June 22, 2024 Feast of St. Paulinus, Bishop and Confessor   
							
							
							
							  
							
							
							  Printable 
			PDF Version
  
							Comments? Write us:  
							
							editor@boston-catholic-journal.com
							
							_________________________ 
							
							
							*
							integrity: the quality 
			or state of being complete, sound, unimpaired or undivided, uncompromised 
							
							
							https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/integrity;
							https://www.dictionary.com/browse/integrity 
							 
							
							1
							https://thedialog.org/vatican-news/pope-francis-reminds-u-s-catholics-being-backward-looking-is-useless/ 
							 
							
							 
							2
							
							
							https://www.americamagazine.org/faith/2022/06/14/pope-francis-traditionalist-gag-243151 
							
							
							
							3 
							“The First See is judged by no one” (#1404, The Code 
			of Canon Law of the Catholic Church, 1983). 
							
							4 
			“We require then that all men, everywhere, shall embrace and observe 
			the teachings of the sacred and holy Roman Church, mother and mistress 
			of other churches; and that at no time in the future should Mass be 
			sung or recited otherwise than according to the manner of the 
			missal which we have published, in any of the churches of 
			the provinces of Christendom, of Patriarchal, Cathedral, Collegiate 
			or parochial status, secular and regular belonging to any kind of order, 
			monasteries, both of men and women, also the military orders, and churches 
			without cure of souls or chapels, in which conventual Mass is customarily 
			celebrated or ought to be celebrated according to the rite of the Roman 
			Church, either aloud with a choir, or in a low voice.”
							https://www.papalencyclicals.net/pius05/p5quopri.htm
							 
							  
							  
							
								___________________________________________________________________________ 
							  
					
					 
					
					
					
					Martyrology for Today
					
					Semen est sanguis Christianorum (The blood of Christians 
					is the seed of the Church) Tertullian, Apologeticum, 
					50
  
					2004 Roman Martyrology by Month 
					
						
							
								
									
										
											
												
													
														
															
																
																	
																		
																			
																				
																					
																					
																						
																							
																								
																								 
																								  
																								  
																								2004 Roman Martyrology 
																								  
																								  
																								  
																								Tuesday,  November 4th in the Year of Grace 2025
																								
																								
  This Day, the Fourth Day of November
																								  
						
						
						Memorial of Saint Charles Borromeo, bishop, 
						who, having been enrolled among the cardinals by his uncle 
						Pope Pius IV and elected Bishop of Milan, was in that see 
						a true shepherd, attentive to the needs of the Church of 
						his time: to form the clergy he gathered synods and established 
						seminaries; to foster Christian morals he visited the whole 
						flock many times and decreed many things for the salvation 
						of souls.  He departed for his heavenly homeland on 
						the day before this day. 
						
						  
						
						2. 
						At Bologna in Emilia, the holy 
						martyrs Vitalis and Agricola, of whom, as Saint Ambrose 
						relates, the former was once the servant of the other, then 
						his companion and fellow in martyrdom: for this one endured 
						every kind of torture in such manner that there was no place 
						on his body without a wound; but the other, not terrified 
						by the punishment of his servant, being affixed to a cross, 
						imitated his martyrdom. 
						
						  
						
						3.  
						At Myra in Lycia, the holy martyrs Nicander, bishop, 
						and Hermes, priest. 
						
						  
						
						4. 
						Commemoration of Saint Pierius, priest of Alexandria, 
						who, illustrious in philosophical teachings but more distinguished 
						for integrity of life and voluntary poverty, while Theonas 
						was governing the Church of Alexandria, taught the people 
						the divine Scriptures thoroughly, and after the persecution 
						rested in peace at Rome. 
						
						  
						
						5.  
						At Rodez in Aquitaine, Saint Amantius, bishop, who is believed 
						to have been the first prelate of this city. 
						
						  
						
						6.  
						At Maastricht in Brabant of Austrasia, Saint Perpetuus, 
						bishop. 
						
						  
						
						7.  
						At Trier in Austrasia, Saint Modesta, abbess, who, 
						consecrated to God from her very infancy, presided worthily 
						over the flock of nuns of the monastery of Oeren in the 
						same city, and was united in the highest intimacy in God 
						with Saint Gertrude of Nivelles. 
						
						  
						
						8.  
						At Székesfehérvár in Pannonia, Saint Emeric, or Henry, 
						son of Saint Stephen, King of the Hungarians, who was overtaken 
						by an untimely death. 
						
						  
						
						9.  
						At Padua in Venetia, blessed Helen Enselmini, virgin 
						of the Order of Poor Clares, who bore many pains and even 
						the loss of speech with wondrous patience. 
						
						  
						
						10.  
						At Cerfroid in the territory of Meaux in France, Saint 
						Felix of Valois, who, after he had led a solitary life 
						for a long time, is held to have been the companion of Saint 
						John of Matha in founding the Order of the Most Holy 
						Trinity for the Redemption of Captives. 
						
						  
						
						11.  
						In the convent of the Scots at Nantes in France, blessed 
						Frances d’Amboise, who, Duchess of Brittany, first founded 
						at Vannes in France a convent of Carmelite nuns, into which, 
						having been widowed, she withdrew as a handmaid of Christ. 
																								
																								  
																								  
																								  
																								__________________________________________________________________
  
																								And elsewhere in divers places, many other holy martyrs, confessors, and holy virgins.
  
																								Omnes sancti Mártyres, oráte pro nobis.  (“All ye Holy Martyrs, pray for us,” from the Litaniae Sanctorum, the Litany of the Saints) 
																								 ℟. Thanks be to God. 
																								  
																								   | 
																							 
																						 
																						  
																						
																							
																								
																									The 1956 edition below, issued during the pontificate of Pope Pius XII, is a revision of the typical edition of 1749, which had been promulgated by Pope Benedict XIV remained the foundational text for later updates throughout the 18th–20th centuries up to 2004 — the English translation of which remained the sole source of the Martyrology until the present translation of the 2004 Roman Martyrology by the Boston Catholic Journal in 2025.   | 
																								 
																							  
																						
																							
																								| 
																								   
																								 
																								1956 ROMAN MARTYROLOGY
																								  
																								Tuesday, October 4th  in the Year of Grace 2025
																								 This Day, the Fourth Day of November
    
						At Milan, St. Charles Borromeo, Cardinal, 
						and Bishop of that city, who was ranked among the 
						Saints by Paul V on account of the holiness of his life 
						and his renown for miracles.  
						 
						At Bologna, the holy martyrs Vitalis 
						and Agricola. The former was first the servant of 
						the latter, and afterwards his partner and colleague in 
						martyrdom. He was subjected by the persecutors to all kinds 
						of torments, so that there was no part of his body without 
						wounds. After having suffered with constancy, he yielded 
						up his soul to God in prayer. Agricola was put to death 
						by being fastened to a cross with many nails. St. Ambrose 
						relates that being present at their translation, he took 
						the martyr's nails, his glorious blood, and the wood of 
						his cross, and deposited them under the consecrated altars.
						 
						 
						The same day, the birthday of the 
						Saints Philologus and Patrobas, disciples of the 
						Apostle St. Paul.  
						 
						At Autun, St. Proculus, bishop and 
						martyr.  
						 
						In Vexin (in the North of France), 
						St. Clarus, priest and martyr. 
						 
						At Ephesus, St. Porphyry, martyr, 
						under the emperor Aurelian.  
						 
						At Myra, in Lycia, the holy martyrs 
						Nicander, bishop, and Hermas, priest, under the governor 
						Libanius.  
						 
						The same day, the birthday of St. 
						Pierius, priest of Alexandria, who, being deeply 
						versed in the Sacred Scriptures, leading a very pure life, 
						and freed from all impediments in order to apply to Christian 
						philosophy, taught the people with great renown, and published 
						various treatises, under the emperors Carus and Diocletian, 
						when Theonas governed the church of Alexandria. After the 
						persecution, he spent the remainder of his life at Rome, 
						where he rested in peace.  
						 
						At Rhodez, in France, blessed Amantius, 
						bishop, whose life was resplendent with sanctity 
						and miracles.  
						 
						In Bithynia, St. Joannicius, abbot.
						 
						 
						In Hungary, at Alba Begale, the demise of
						St. Emeric, confessor, son 
						of St. Stephen, king of  Hungary.  
						 
						In the monastery of Cerfroid, in the diocese of Meaux,
						St. Felix de Valois, founder 
						of the Order of the Most Holy Trinity for the Redemption 
						of Captives. His feast is celebrated on the 20th of this 
						month by order of Innocent XI.  
						 
						 
						And elsewhere in divers places, many other holy martyrs, 
						confessors, and holy virgins. 
						 
						 
						
						Omnes sancti 
						Mártyres, oráte pro nobis. 
						(“All 
						ye Holy Martyrs, pray for us,” from the Litaniae Sanctorum, the Litany 
						of the Saints) 
						Response: Thanks be to God. 
																								
																								
  
																								   | 
																							 
																						  
																					__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________  
																			 
																		 
																	  
															   
												     
							   
					
					 
					1959 Roman Martyrology by Month 
					
						
						   
						__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 
						   
					
  
					Why the Martyrs Matter 
					 
					Each 
					day we bring you a 
					calendar, a list really, of the holy Martyrs who had suffered 
					and died for Christ, for His Bride the Church, and for our holy 
					Catholic Faith; men and women for whom — and well they knew 
					— their Profession of Faith would cost them their lives.
					
  They could have repudiated all three (Christ, Church, and Catholic 
					Faith) and kept their lives for a short time longer (even the 
					lapsi * only postponed their death — and 
					at so great a cost!)
  What would motivate men, women, even children and entire families 
					to willingly undergo the most evil and painfully devised tortures; 
					to suffer death rather than denial?
  Why did they not renounce their Catholic Faith when the first 
					flame licked at their feet, after the first eye was plucked 
					out, or after they were “baptized” in mockery by boiling water 
					or molten lead poured over their heads? Why did they not flee 
					to offer incense to the pagan gods since such a ritual concession 
					would be merely perfunctory, having been done, after all, under 
					duress, exacted by the compulsion of the state? What is a little 
					burned incense and a few words uttered without conviction, compared 
					to your own life and the lives of those you love? Surely God 
					knows that you are merely placating the state with empty gestures 
					…
  Did they love their wives, husbands, children — their mothers, 
					fathers and friends less than we do? Did they value their own 
					lives less? Were they less sensitive to pain than we are? In 
					a word, what did they possess that we do not?
  Nothing. They possessed what we ourselves are given in the Sacrament 
					of Confirmation — but cleaved to it in far greater measure than 
					we do: Faith and faithfulness; fortitude and valor, uncompromising 
					belief in the invincible reality of God, of life eternal in 
					Him for the faithful, of damnation everlasting apart from Him 
					for the unfaithful; of the ephemerality of this passing world 
					and all within it, and lives lived in total accord with that 
					adamant belief.
  We are the Martyrs to come! What made them so will make us 
					so. What they suffered we will suffer. What they died for, we 
					will die for. If only we will! For most us, life will be 
					a bloodless martyrdom, a suffering for Christ, for the sake 
					of Christ, for the sake of the Church in a thousand ways outside 
					the arena. The road to Heaven is lined on both sides with Crosses, 
					and upon the Crosses people, people who suffered unknown to 
					the world, but known to God. Catholics living in partibus 
					infidelium, under the scourge of Islam. Loveless marriages. 
					Injustices on all sides. Poverty. Illness. Old age. Dependency. 
					They are the cruciform! Those whose lives became Crosses because 
					they would not flee God, the Church, the call to, the 
					demand for, holiness in the most ordinary things of life made 
					extraordinary through the grace of God. The Martyrology we celebrate 
					each day is just a vignette, a small, immeasurably small, sampling 
					of the martyrdom that has been the lives of countless men and 
					women whom Christ and the Angels know, but whom the world does 
					not know. 
  “Exemplum enim dedi vobis”, Christ 
					said to His Apostles: “I have given you an example.” And His 
					Martyrs give one to us — and that is why the Martyrs matter. 
					
						- 
						
						A Martyr is 
						one who suffers tortures and a violent death for 
						the sake of Christ and the Catholic Faith. 
						  
						- 
						
						A Confessor 
						is one who confesses Christ publicly in times of persecution 
						and who suffers torture, or severe punishment by secular 
						authorities as a consequence. It is a title given only 
						given to those who suffered for the Faith  — 
						but was not  killed for it  —   
						and who had persevered in the Faith until the 
						end.   
					 
					 Geoffrey K. Mondello Editor 
					 
					editor@boston-catholic-journal.com
					 Boston Catholic Journal 
					Note: 
					We suggest that you explore our newly edited and revised
					“De 
					SS. Martyrum Cruciatibus — The Torments and Tortures of the 
					Christian Martyrs” 
					for an in-depth historical account of the sufferings of the 
					Martyrs. 
					____________________________ 
					
					
						* 
						Those early Christians who renounced their Catholic Faith 
						in times of persecution. When confronted with the prospect 
						of torture and death if they held fast to their faith in 
						Christ, they denied Him and their Faith through an act of 
						sacrificing (often incense) to the pagan Roman gods and 
						in so doing kept their lives and/or their freedom and property. 
					 
					   
				  
			 
			
				
					
						
						 
						  
						
						  
						
						Totally 
						Faithful to the Sacred Deposit of Faith entrusted 
						to the Holy See in Rome 
						 
						
						
						
						“Scio 
						opera tua ... quia modicum habes virtutem, et servasti verbum 
						Meum, nec non negasti Nomen Meum” 
						 
						
						“I 
						know your works ... that you have but little power, and 
						yet you have kept My word, and have not denied My Name.”
						
						
						(Apocalypse 3.8) 
						Copyright © 2004 - 2025 Boston 
						Catholic Journal. All rights reserved. Unless otherwise 
						stated, permission is granted by the Boston Catholic Journal 
						for the copying and distribution of the articles and audio 
						files under the following conditions:  No additions, 
						deletions, or changes are to be made to the text or audio 
						files in any way, and the copies may not be sold for a profit. 
						In the reproduction, in any format of any image, graphic, 
						text, or audio file, attribution must be given to the Boston 
						Catholic Journal. 
						 
						 
						 | 
					 
				 
			 
			 |