Cornona Viris — COVD-19 —
the Crown of Death
WHAT?! — I’m
the Crown of Death
An Impolite Reminder
Who gave much thought to it before
the Corona Virus — COVID-19 — made the inevitable
a distinct possibility? Suddenly we are confronting
the possibility of widespread death — even Democrats who
have made widespread death through abortion, infanticide, “a
woman’s right” to murder her own children, assisted-suicide,
and euthanasia, an integral part of their Democratic
platform … to make everyone’s life better, you understand
(except, of course, those they acrimoniously legislate to kill.)
But this looming death — COVID-19 —
even for Democrat ideologues is far more terrible than
selectively killing off babies — even those who survive
abortion and are butchered alive: it fetches off whom it pleases:
Democrat as well as Republican, Liberal as well as
Conservative. I mean, who wants indiscriminate death?
According to Democratic demagogues, death must be either chosen or
legislated and eventually become the 28th
Amendment to the Constitution.
But it must NOT be indiscriminate! It must be — to use the
now tiresome phrase that applies to anything — “weaponized”
against non-liberals, non-Democrats, and everyone else who
is not in lock-step with them.
COVID-19? A political device that, in agreement with General
Secretary Xi Jinping of China is the fault of President
Trump and Conservative Americans who have not been correctly
indoctrinated “re-educated” at American universities and colleges — and
who maliciously believe the “propaganda” that Chairman Jinping himself, and
his CCP, are largely and inexcusably at fault. Yes, there
really are people — many of them — mostly Democrats,
together with Anarchists and Nihilists — who hold that
ideology is dearer than life itself.
Until it comes to them,
or waits at their doorstep. They fear dying, even
while they mercilessly inflict death on the innocent. They
fear death even more than they fear not toeing the
“And all this — COVID-19, death, sickness, and all the
attending inconveniences — are mysteriously because of President Trump and
unenlightened social and political conservatives” who are so
backward, so ill-informed, that they actually believe in
absolute values like life, traditional families, religion
and the like. And, oh yes, ,… they are all carrying guns
under their jackets and skirts and are secretly
white-supremacists ... even if they are black.
Let’s cut to the chase: you are going to die! Sometime. And
with absolute certainty. Democrats may sooner or later legislate your death
for some capricious reason that for the time being gains
superficial and utterly specious social or political
traction — and actually sounds “cool” to them —
the proof of which resides in the trenchant and profound
wisdom of the late night “comedians” who eagerly lend
their levitas-cum-gravitas to seal an otherwise bankrupt
agendum through derision; ... or you may die by COVID-19, a heart attack, stroke, or “other”
serious but non-infectious illness or disease, or even
old age (until Democrats eventually find longevity
to insult you further (as well you deserve) —
It is time to trample upon your factitious,
fragile, democratic, and genderless sensitivities ... to
invade your “Safe Spaces”. It will give me great pleasure
and I will indulge myself.
Allow me to put this appalling state of
affairs into perspective: although Holy Mother Church has
not declared it so — especially under the extremely
sensitive, earthy, idolatrous, profane, and feckless papacy
of Francis — the entire matter appears rather clear
to me: it is at least plausible —
it would certainly be “just”— and
therefore extremely likely, that this 21st
century plague is entirely and existentially commensurable
with this generation’s utter repudiation of God, reason,
morality, and decency. To repudiate God is to
repudiate all three.
The murder of children in
— and, if still alive, now outside
— their own mother’s wombs. Babies who
somehow survive abortions are either butchered alive
or left unaided to die unattended while those who
botched the abortion stand by.
depraved lusting of men for boys and other men.
The unnatural lusting of women for other women.
The pretension of “choice-of-gender” or “no gender”
— despite all biologically discernible physical
appendages (or the absence of them).
The inhumane practice of “Gender-RE-assignment”
through cosmetic surgery — however
clearly artificial and incongruous the outcome. (think
6’-2” x 220 lbs with a baritone voice, a pronounced
Adam’s Apple, and a “5 O’clock shadow”).
Lawsuits between parents, one of whom
ideologically insists that their child is the
opposite sex of which he or she is born despite the
presence of the ineradicable YX (male) or XX (female)
chromosome that scientifically defines
gender. In other words, the child becomes a
means to advocating an abnormal social
agendum — despite a 40-50% rate of
attempted suicide among those with an artificially
engineered sexual identity.1
“Drag-Queen Story Hours” at local
libraries to which “liberal, enlightened, and
progressive” mothers bring their innocent
children — to introduce them to, and to indoctrinate
them in, abnormal gender dysphoria — as though it were
“normal” (it is not).
God and prayer banished from schools and
public places as an impediment to the corrupt and
militantly atheistic agenda of
“more enlightened and progressive” men and women who
disdain those who are religious as backward, uneducated,
ill-informed, and unenlightened ... peasants. They are
not among the smug “illuminati” — who
Licentiousness as “liberated sexuality”
— despite Sexually Transmitted Diseases (STDs):
HIV, chlamydia, syphilis, hepatitis A, hepatitis B,
hepatitis C, and attending illnesses,
co-morbidity, and morbidity.
Pornography as “entertainment” that has
become among the most widely accessed venues on the
Widespread “recreational” drug use
— cocaine, methamphetamines (“meth”), opioids,
crack, marijuana, ecstasy, heroin, flakka — together with the
crime, violence, and death
that accompanies it.
institutions of higher-learning removing crucifixes and
identifiably Catholic statuary, frescoes, and religious art, in obeisance to
a “progressive”, liberal, and militantly secular culture.
Nominally Catholic students at
Nominally Catholic Colleges crying out for
abortion while viciously (often physically) attacking
Pro-Life Students and denouncing them (in their
typically Democratic “open-mindedness”) with
relentlessly repetitive, loathsome, and utterly tiresome
mantras. Having failed to mature into adulthood, they
neurotically regress to the immature mindset that they
learned as spoiled brats: if one repeats something over
and over ad nauseam, they will get their way
as they always have (“I want it!”, “I want it!”, “I
want it!”, “I want it!”) still believing that mere
childish repetition will mysteriously overcome
adult opposition — and that the word “no” to them (with
which most of them are unfamiliar) will finally collapse
under the insufferable weight of their adolescent
malice, bring acceptance by wearying us into
submission with their juvenile ditties: “Keep your
Rosaries off my ovaries”, “Right to Life that’s a lie!
You don’t care if women die”, “Woman’s body, woman’s
choice”, and other such breath-taking profundities.
Faces filled with hate , these Socialist pupae denounce
what they cannot assail, including sanity, logic, and
reason, as they sulk in their “Safe Spaces” against every
imaginary “Micro-aggression” possible. Cuddling their
university-supplied stuffed comfort animal in one hand,
they would throttle an infant with the other. Cool!
defiance of every form of authority (outside the Democratic Party).
That is to say, utter “freedom-from” and
absolute “freedom-to” — anything.
A pagan earth goddess —
“Pachamama” idolized and formally worshipped in the
Vatican Gardens before the approving eyes of Francis and
his apostate Bishops who promote a primitive
fable of the Amazonian “mother earth goddess” as
the paradigm of true spirituality —
rather than proclaiming the authentic Evangel of God
the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost. PachaPAPA
apotheosizes “the environment” while mocking and repudiating the
“rigid and outdated” Catholic religion of the 2000 years of his
predecessors. PachaPAPA is an unabashed Modernist
— and, perhaps, a pagan himself.
Francis declares that the current Plague
of COVID-19 is NOT a chastisement from God (as a
all the above) but rather is
Mother Earth “having a fit” because of
“environmental pollution.” Click the link.
In a word, we more than
deserve this pestilence
America has become
and the jack-boot is on any throat of dissent or defiance.
To advert to a colloquial term presently
unacceptable in polite ecclesiastical discourse, the present
situation in which we find ourselves amid this escalating
pestilence it is not at all unlikely a chastisement from God
— and it is altogether
appropriate that Godless Communist China was the flail.
Does this mean that God does not
affirm, anoint, and bless us in all our desires,
crimes and perversity? Indeed, how can that possibly
be, given the gentle, kind, all-loving, all-forgiving,
non-demanding, and totally avuncular nature of God Who
merely winks at our waywardness — that is to say, the
“God” we have been weaned upon for the past 60 years since
the conclusion of Vatican II Who holds none accountable and
has only one everlasting (and blissful) abode for all of
us despite His insistent babbling about penance,
atonement, and that forever-distant never-never-land that He
called Hell in that fairy-tale called Holy Scripture? Such a
“God” would never bridle our wantonness!
We need to be affirmed ...
not saved! He damned-well knows that!
We’ll leave you to argue that line of
reasoning at the Last Judgment.
To return to the matter at hand:
You are going to die! 100% Guaranteed!
And Who decides — unless you take your own
life — is not you! Nor when you die.
You do not believe in God so why fear? There is no Hell for
you or anyone else! It is the extinction of consciousness,
or self-awareness — and so there is no “you” to be bothered
by whatever transpires after you buy the farm. How quickly,
at the hour of your death, will all the illusions you
cherish about the continuation of your petty self in some
insane form of “energy” or whatever you conceive to be the
boat that you will float on forever — how quickly your
irresponsible fantasies abandon you when you realize that
there is a Judge after all and that there
are consequences to the way
in which you have squandered your life. Deep down inside you
it — but hedged your bets on having the best of BOTH worlds.
COVID-19 is a “wake up call” to your delirium (opiated or
otherwise) that life will go on forever — for you!
It is equally a call to what appears
dreadfully present: the time to repent (remember that long-disdained
word abolished after Vatican II?) and
to believe what God Himself has revealed to you through His
Only-Begotten Son Jesus Christ.
There ARE things that you
MUST do! And there are things that you MUST NEVER do!
And there is One in Whom you MUST believe.
However “superior” you conceitedly believe your “intellect”
to be, there are greater things than the self
— and particularly YOURSELF!
The First and foremost is God. But it should be of deeply
personal interest to you that there are OTHER things as well
… like Heaven, and … yes … Hell. And both are forever.
Whether or not you die today or next month is of little
consequence. What is paradoxically vital is that you
recognize it. You ARE
Repent and be converted.
is the acceptable time.” (2 Corinthians 6.2)
“How quaint!”, you smugly say — as the corpses
increasingly surround you — exponentially, day by day.
I do not agree. But I am, admittedly, among the peasants you
how can I possibly and credibly contend with such
progressive, educated, enlightened, sophisticated, and inflexible
However, I will suggest that you have everything to gain — and much
suffering — even eternal suffering — to lose.
Pascals’s Wager *, I submit, is apropos to the
argument — and your wager has never been higher.
I will also remind you that you did not make the world, and had no say in
it. This applies equally to what lies beyond it.
Geoffrey K. Mondello
Boston Catholic Journal
March 31 2020
- God exists,
or He does not.
- We cannot appeal
to Reason to determine which proposition is
true. It is, however, necessarily the case
that the proposition is true
or that it is not true.
- Both cannot
be true and both cannot be false.
- Since Reason
cannot determine the truth-value (true, or
not-true) of either proposition, we must
at the very least appeal to the historically
universal intelligibility of
the proposition itself. The question
“God exists or God
does not exist”
is a coherent question
regardless of whether the answer is
affirmative or not. If the question
is intelligible, then the
concept implicit in the question is
intelligible as well. It is in no way
answering the question. This is to say that
the existence of God is either plausible or
implausible — which is another way of saying
that whether God exists or does not exist is
either possibly true or possibly
untrue. Given that it is at least
possibly true — and that such
a proposition has a conceptual pedigree that
appears to coincide with humankind itself —
the possibly true necessarily
admits of the probably true as
- Given that the
proposition can attain to only
probably true at best
and that probability “means”
“as likely as not”
— given the preponderance of historical
evidence (in the absence of any other
kind of evidence),
probability alone is all that we can
invoke — although it will never provide a
- “You must wager (it
is not optional)” That is to say,
you are alive and you are
going to die. The consequences of each
are inevitable. There is no conditional
- “Let us weigh the
gain and the loss in wagering that God is.
Let us estimate these two chances. If you
gain, you gain all; if you lose, you lose
- “Wager, then,
without hesitation that He is. There is here
an infinity of an infinitely happy life to
gain, a chance of gain against a finite
number of chances of loss, and what you
stake is finite. And so our proposition is
of infinite force when there is the finite
to stake in a game where there are equal
risks of gain and of loss, and the infinite
The Argument in its
there is a God, He is infinitely
incomprehensible, since, having neither parts
nor limits, He has no affinity to us. We are
then incapable of knowing either what He is or
if He is....
...“God is, or He
is not.” But to
which side shall we incline? Reason can decide
nothing here. There is an infinite chaos which
separated us. A game is being played at the
extremity of this infinite distance where heads
or tails will turn up. What will you wager?
According to reason, you can do neither the one
thing nor the other; according to reason, you
can defend neither of the propositions.
Do not, then, reprove for error those who have
made a choice; for you know nothing about it.
"No, but I blame them for having made, not this
choice, but a choice; for again both he who
chooses heads and he who chooses tails are
equally at fault, they are both in the wrong.
The true course is not to wager at all.”
Yes; but you must wager. It is not optional. You
are embarked. Which will you choose then? Let us
see. Since you must choose, let us see which
interests you least. You have two things to
lose, the true and the good; and two things to
stake, your reason and your will, your knowledge
and your happiness; and your nature has two
things to shun, error and misery. Your reason is
no more shocked in choosing one rather than the
other, since you must of necessity choose. This
is one point settled. But your happiness? Let us
weigh the gain and the loss in wagering that God
is. Let us estimate these two chances. If you
gain, you gain all; if you lose, you lose
nothing. Wager, then, without hesitation that He
“That is very fine.
Yes, I must wager; but I may perhaps wager too
much.” Let us see.
Since there is an equal risk of gain and of
loss, if you had only to gain two lives, instead
of one, you might still wager. But if there were
three lives to gain, you would have to play
(since you are under the necessity of playing),
and you would be imprudent, when you are forced
to play, not to chance your life to gain three
at a game where there is an equal risk of loss
and gain. But there is an eternity of life and
happiness. And this being so, if there were an
infinity of chances, of which one only would be
for you, you would still be right in wagering
one to win two, and you would act stupidly,
being obliged to play, by refusing to stake one
life against three at a game in which out of an
infinity of chances there is one for you, if
there were an infinity of an infinitely happy
life to gain. But there is here an infinity of
an infinitely happy life to gain, a chance of
gain against a finite number of chances of loss,
and what you stake is finite.”
Pensées, part III, §233
Blaise Pascal (French mathematician, physicist,
inventor, writer and Catholic theologian)